Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › News In The Buff
-
AuthorPosts
-
18 March, 2010 at 12:30 pm #14506
Sian Williams ‘would appear nude’
Sian Williams’ accountant said her clothing should be tax deductable.
TV presenter Sian Williams’s accountant told a tax tribunal she would be willing to present her BBC show naked, but BBC bosses would not let her.
However, the man who brought the case has admitted the BBC Breakfast host had made no such suggestion.
The tribunal was to establish whether costs for hairstyling, clothing and cleaning costs to look good on screen could be tax deductible.
The tribunal – which rejected the claim – heard arguments put forward at the hearing by her accountant that “she would be prepared to read the news without clothes and only wears the clothes because her employer requires it”.
Williams’s agent Alex Armitage said the suggestion about appearing unclothed had not come from her – and she had in any case already paid the tax. “This did not come from her. She paid her tax and as I understand it, the accountant did it off his own back,” he said.
The north London accountant who brought the case, Michael Weissbraun, admitted Williams had not actually made the comments.
He said: “She might not have said that exact form of words. It was an argument that I advanced and it was to make a point that clothes were needed not only to keep warm.
“She gave me the go-ahead (to bring the case) but it was nothing she had been involved with. There was no need for her to attend the hearing. She had already paid the tax. It was a question of whether she could get something back or not.”
The case arose from a tax return for Williams for the financial year 2004/5, which included expenses claims for £3,231 for clothing in the studio, £975 for hairstyling and £325 for laundry of work outfits. At the tribunal hearing earlier this year, her accountant argued it was an implied term that she must not wear the same clothes more than twice or three times a month.
His argument about performing without clothes was was rejected as “unrealistic” by the tribunal.
Also in the news, Victoria Beckham (Who is she, i hear you ask) has been ordering pizzas’ for husband David whilst he’s been in a clinic. (And this made the news because)?
There’s been fury as a mum dressed her baby as Hitler.. Forget that, why not go arrest these parents who dress their babies in Burberry?
Lady from Hampshire made the news because she’s lived in the same house for 96 years!
Oh how i love reading the News.. :roll:
18 March, 2010 at 2:30 pm #436078Wasn’t she the lovley whose hubby ran off with one of the cheeky girls? lol
18 March, 2010 at 2:31 pm #436079Who? Victoria Beckham?.. :lol:
18 March, 2010 at 2:32 pm #436080Victoria Beckham hasn’t got a bit of cheek….. she’s all bone. :p
18 March, 2010 at 2:43 pm #436081I’ve seen her.. I tried calling her over, but she hid behind the Lamp-Post!
18 March, 2010 at 3:05 pm #436082@melody wrote:
Wasn’t she the lovley whose hubby ran off with one of the cheeky girls? lol
Lembit Opik,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,now what kinda name is that, I think him and the cheeky tart are well suited and sian williams was well rid! :wink: :lol: :lol:
18 March, 2010 at 8:00 pm #436083@cas wrote:
@melody wrote:
Wasn’t she the lovley whose hubby ran off with one of the cheeky girls? lol
Lembit Opik,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,now what kinda name is that, I think him and the cheeky tart are well suited and sian williams was well rid! :wink: :lol: :lol:
That’s the one!
Apparently I can’t spell lovely either lol
19 March, 2010 at 12:21 am #436084I keep thinking that somehow “Lembit Opik” is an anagram for something disgusting, like nose picking.
19 March, 2010 at 10:36 am #436085Sooner that than Lord Adonis
19 March, 2010 at 9:03 pm #436086@forumhostpb wrote:
I keep thinking that somehow “Lembit Opik” is an anagram for something disgusting, like nose picking.
or a russian s.t.d..
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!