Name and Shame?

@thin ice wrote:

@yourchoice wrote:

Ill have to remember not to take the law into my own hands if i ever find a burglar in the house on a night and he accidentally falls down the stairs. :-

if he falls then its not your fault
do you remeber the footballer duncan ferguson
a rather big chap
on 2 occasions he caught burglars and beat the crap out of them
he never got proscuted lol said it was self defence
but when 3 of you gang up on some one tie there hands up and intimidate them then thats a whole dif story

They should have made a proper job of it and put him in the stocks.Thieving little sh.it Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

@yourchoice wrote:

@thin ice wrote:

@yourchoice wrote:

Ill have to remember not to take the law into my own hands if i ever find a burglar in the house on a night and he accidentally falls down the stairs. :-

if he falls then its not your fault
do you remeber the footballer duncan ferguson
a rather big chap
on 2 occasions he caught burglars and beat the crap out of them
he never got proscuted lol said it was self defence
but when 3 of you gang up on some one tie there hands up and intimidate them then thats a whole dif story

They should have made a proper job of it and put him in the stocks.Thieving little sh.it Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

never been proved he stole a thing :roll:

@thin ice wrote:

@kent f OBE wrote:

@thin ice wrote:

@kent f OBE wrote:

If Simon Cremer was not 100% about the theft he would not have frogmarched him down to the police station the way he did.

We had 2 incidents ourselves with shoplifters in this last week. Detained both in the shop whilst the police got here. The second one…Monday’s incident was a female. She continuosly tried to leave the shop and I physically restrained her again and again. Telling her I can touch her and I will touch her to restrain her, none of her crap will wash with me.

your legally entitled to hold them while the police arrive
but to take them agaist there will is illegal
thats the facts of it
if he is innocent of any wrong doing why did he pay the compensation

Trust me they were both held against their will. You can keep them if they have commited a crime on your premises. It’s called citizens arrest although I didnt arrest them as such just made them stay lol….and the compensation was paid because of barmy rights laws. All of a sudden these people have feelings in times when the tables are turned, wonder if he stole with feeling? :roll:

never been proved he stole any thing :wink:

I dare say the caution relates to the theft.Ive also just read that the boss stands to lose his house because of it.Ive changed my mind on the stocks the sh.it should be horse whipped.

@kent f OBE wrote:

Thin murderers get away on technicalities. We all know it happens and everyone knows the murder was commited by that person. I think we can imagine what the thiefs lawyer focused on througout the trial. Trying to get sympathy from the jury, as to how they would feel if it was their partner/brother/son bollocks.

theres the point he didnt get a trial
mr cremer was judge and jury
the police decided not to prosecute because the so called thief claimed he was owed the money
and given that mr cremer seems preety unbalanced and unreasonable
i tend to belive the so called thief as did the police

@kent f OBE wrote:

The police decided not to prosecute (just looked it up) because it becomes a civil matter, where the theif claimed he was owed money it was probably decided by the CPS it’s not in the public interest to prosecute due to cost. Which happens all the time. Doesn’t mean there was no crime.
(will handcuff you if you argue anymore :lol: )

i rest my case me lord :roll:

as one crim said from the dock

let god be my judge
im not guilty innocent

the judge replied

hes not

i am

your are

2 years