-
Posts
-
Duno if i remember this right but i once heard thats vets prefer your cat to have 1 litter before being steralised
It was on some show or a vat told some 1 i new i carnt think back now but im sure im right
No doupt some 1 will put me straight if i aint :lol:
Look a bit like Geri Halliwell in that pic.
@Bad Manners wrote:
Look a bit like Geri Halliwell in that pic.
cant see it meself :?
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
@pats wrote:
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
@pats wrote:
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
i’ve said it before im sure, but i’ll say it again. Why people let their pet cats breed repeatedly (i assume for money? :roll: ) is beyond me when there are thousands of cats/kittens in rescue centres being dumped daily and cant be rehomed. You are adding to the problem. If you cared about your cat at all you would have her sterilised. Do you think she enjoys being used as a money making machine? and having her babies taken from her? Do the right thing and act like a responsible pet owner in future.
i dont sell them :shock: they go to good homes.
a home which could have been taken by one of the thousands of abandoned animals. Its not fair on your cat to put her through this time and time again. Have her sterilised.
who said i was gonna put her thro it time and time again???this is her first and last litter. and i know about abandoned cats………..she was born under a tree in my mates garden..the mother cat was feral. my mate found homes for 2 and rescue rangers got homes for the other 2.
first and last huh, so you are getting her sterilised?
thing is, why let her breed at all? and im sure youve said somewhere that you let other cats youve had breed. Stop adding to the problem.
It’s in the intrest of the cat to have atleast one litter
says who? :?
ask any vet, when you take them for their first injections, they will tell you straight away to book them in for the op.
i think the thought about just 1 litter is a human emotion need allowing a cat to just have some babies, it is infact more beneficial health wise, to not let them have a litter before being spayed as by doing so you can reduce the chance of many diseases later in life such as breast cancer and mammary tumours to name just 2
It’s a well known fact, vets only come out with that tosh because they care about the strays, my old vet told me it is more likely that your cat will become ill if they don’t have kittens, just as it is more likely for a woman to get breast cancer if she hasn’t breast fed…
@*Sian wrote:
It’s a well known fact, vets only come out with that tosh because they care about the strays, my old vet told me it is more likely that your cat will become ill if they don’t have kittens, just as it is more likely for a woman to get breast cancer if she hasn’t breast fed…
….and i assume from that that YOU dont care about the strays?? :? Politics is in fact right on this one, vets will tell you that animals are more susceptible to diseases if they havent been spayed, there are no medical benefits whatsoever in letting them have one litter. For every kitten you let your cat have you are taking up a home that could have been used for one of the thousands of strays…think about it :roll:
Isn’t that like saying for every baby a human woman has, she is taking up a home that could have been used by the thousands of unwanted children? Think about it..
do babies get put down if they cant be rehomed?? think about it ….
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!