Multiculturalism V General services?

And again no one said we can have a parade but there’ll be less money for police they didnt take the parade money out of the police budget and if a parade hadnt occurred the police wouldnt have got the extra money. Traffic lights at the new junction or more police on the street protecting us from knife crime fill in a pot hole or buy the police some new boots so they can prevent knife crime

Both they arent mutually exclusive

@emmalush wrote:

@pete wrote:

What they take it away from police funding to hold a Sikh parade well i never and neither did they

You would think the sikh community would prefer more police on the streets than police guarding the sikh’s carrying swords illegally on the streets.

In that respect, do the sikh’s care about their religion more than everyone generally?

You, my dear, are wrongly informed and should get your facts right before posting anything on here.
Sikhs do not carry their dagger illegally on the streets. The dagger is part of their ceremonial outfit, just like the dagger the scots are wearing, and the government, in their wisdom, has decided to let them carry it to keep peace and not to appear to be discriminate against the Sikhs. They would have screamed murder if the government had allowed the jocks to wear it but not the Sikhs.

@emmalush wrote:

@Man in Beds wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

@pete wrote:

What they take it away from police funding to hold a Sikh parade well i never and neither did they

You would think the sikh community would prefer more police on the streets than police guarding the sikh’s carrying swords illegally on the streets.

In that respect, do the sikh’s care about their religion more than everyone generally?

You, my dear, are wrongly informed and should get your facts right before posting anything on here.
Sikhs do not carry their dagger illegally on the streets. The dagger is part of their ceremonial outfit, just like the dagger the scots are wearing, and the government, in their wisdom, has decided to let them carry it to keep peace and not to appear to be discriminate against the Sikhs. They would have screamed murder if the government had allowed the jocks to wear it but not the Sikhs.

Did i say dagger??? Swords, i said

SWORDS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/leicester/content/articles/2006/04/10/vaisakhi_2006_feature.shtml

Now then :D who’s for using our taxes to fund Sikh’s carrying swords on our streets illegally, or use taxes to catch those who commit knife crime?

Sword…..just a fooking long dagger