Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Motivations of the 'Million Women March'
-
AuthorPosts
-
25 January, 2017 at 7:57 pm #1020507
No, cutting off people’s hands for minor criminal offences isn’t barbaric at all.
You are not even aware there are different versions of sharia law, being the expert you are, that surprises me. You are also obsessed with Muslims and quote extreme examples randomly like a Daily Mail sub editor. There is no context in your irrational fear of Muslims . You hide behind the veil of womens rights while totally ignoring the suppression of women on your own doorstop, by your own society.
You talk about suppression of women preaching from an Islamic perspective when in Saudi Arabia it’s illegal for a woman to drive a car haha you should do stand up comedy. Islam demonises women more than any other religion known to man where they have no equal rights, cant drive , have only just been given the vote in 2016 whilst preaching the teachings of a paedophile prophet muhammed married to a 6 year old kid . Speaking of veils the fewer there are in western civilised countries the better.. let them go back to the dark age islamic hell holes and preach their debauchery there
25 January, 2017 at 8:01 pm #1020509drac, you’re getting hysterical. Sharia courts in the UK don’t chop people’s hands off etc. If any court did, then they’d be acting illegally. And the Linda Motivator photos are silly but hardly jihadi. I notice you said she was implying sharia law in the USA; not advocating it. Implying! If she were a jihadi, Chump would be trumpeting it everywhere.
They’re clearly not main stream courts are they as any court which doesn’t adhere to English law is effectively a kangaroo court and illegal. If someone implied paedophilia was ok, would your argument be that it’s ok as she was not ” advocating it”? Islam has no place in any developed country and belongs consigned to the dark ages with it’s prehistoric ignorant values preaching hatred of all things not muslim… why the fck should any country adhere to sharia law or even any implication of it made?
25 January, 2017 at 8:08 pm #1020510That march was wonderful. The very day after Chump was sworn in, a huge number of people turned up to protest. That must be a first. The aerial photos were very impressive. What was good about it was that people are starting to fight back against the authoritarian Right. At last! Chump bullied and lied his way into the White House, apparently with Putin’s aid, and people are starting to stand up and say No! to the Original Mr Gobshyte puddy-grabber with the Mussolini-like jutting chin. Wonderful!!
Whats wonderful about a load of masked thugs creating carnage, criminal damage and general mayhem so “impressive” they didn’t even have the nerve to show their miserable faces? Interesting how these ” liberals” who are apparently all tolerant , peaceful lovely left wing people riot throwing their toys out of the pram when the vote doesn’t go their way but the “aggressive Trump brigade” accepted Obamas tenure instead of smashing cars , shops, houses … people like you just epitomise hypocrisy both in word and action which is why trump got in / brexit happened. The general population are sick to death of whining tosspots like you with your hypocritical rantings about being tolerant to “minorities” and then throwing a paddy after the people have spoken in a democratic election. Suck it up – you lost … if you can’t accept it phone the samaritans or fck off up a tree smoking a peace pipe u pathetic left wing fool.
25 January, 2017 at 8:12 pm #1020511That march was wonderful.
That march was wonderful.
Does that include the anarcho-communist elements of the march?
Sceptical guy is just a gormless fool , he probably sits there in a dark room thinking the protesters are carrying cardboard cut outs of trump out blowing kisses at one another. I’d love to know his reaction if it was his property being torched the poor lamb
25 January, 2017 at 8:18 pm #1020512Post a random picture with no verifiable source and claim it is evidence. Make a provocative statement just to (provoke) elicit a response, rinse and repeat for the next 20 pages. Got to love the Justchat boards. Like a hamster on wheel! Chug Chug!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/20/anti-donald-trump-activists-try-block-access-inauguration/ Google is hard
Google also states there are aliens and one legged leprechauns living in Mongolia. If you attempted this ruse in any academic setting, you would be laughed out the building. Plus these faux pas debates just don’t cut the muster anyway and are merely a front for your overt Islamophobia.
I think any rational person would be ” islamaphobic ” … who in their right minds wants to condone a ” religion” preaching paedophilia , hatred and a “holy book” which incites more terrorism activity than all other religions put together.
https://books.google.com/books/about/ISLAM_SHARIA_LAW_AND_JIHAD_ARE_TREASON.html?id=HjKKCgAAQBAJ
25 January, 2017 at 8:24 pm #1020513Kennedy was inaugurated in snow. Inauguration date is usually bad weather – it’s the time of year. And inaugurations attract large numbers of people from across the nation, not just one city. To me what matters is the size of the demonstrations. They show the genuine disgust and worry of a surprising number of people at the very beginning of Chump’s term in office. You seem obsessed with Communists. The pictures were of anarchists – the tv showed them carrying black flags. Anarchists carry black flags; Communists carry red flags. The characters are everywhere in tiny numbers; they are idiots. In Britain, there is a group called Class War which carries these things out – or they did once. I’m not up-to-date with who does it now. Who was on the Organising Committee? I’d be shocked if there were only one organiser!! Does the red-baiting Muslim-sniffing Breitbart have anything on the others? As SHR pointed out, finding one Muslim in Wembley football stadium during a big match doesn’t mean that the football league is run by jihadis.
so your main argument that Trump will be a disaster is there were smaller crowds in a state which is one of the biggest democrat states in the country with increased security protocol meaning fewer people could attend… how sad
25 January, 2017 at 8:29 pm #1020514It’s interesting how some people aren’t used to power and freedoms at all.. Saying that someone hates someone doesn’t mean anything except for that they may change. If love is one sided, then that is an invitation to reevaluate myself and to maybe discover something new that I love that I want to adapt to myself. There is no force or *having to* in that. Words should be everywhere so that it’s not a big deal to anyone. Morals is a tough competition. People may not look like the best, but open efforts is all someone needs to have the emancipation to pursue happiness and fruits no matter who it is.
I can’t continue to read the gibberish you write as it makes no sense. Can I politely suggest you re read this guff and think about what you are posting as it makes less sense than buying a comb for a bald man.
25 January, 2017 at 9:31 pm #1020515I don’t know why people are falsely worried about Muslims everywhere when they leave others’ alone. Non-Islamic people converting to Islam because they were asked is a little weird when people can just communicate that it might be a good idea to hint at or try convincing Muslims to convert religions. They do tend to try to make others convert, but it is pretty scary to think that so many people would participate in conspiracy.. It can be torture to most people and it makes groups of people unconfident and unsure about themselves because then nobody knows whats going on when so many people don’t know what they think and think what others think, so it can be nice for people to know those types of people and to choose friends, workplaces, etc accordingly in the meantime, I think. But yeah, I think it’s possible how few person can indirectly affect the sentiments of many people through mediums because some people would rather have “unpleasant” things such as change happen through individuals rather than trusting entire populations. It’s always better to be trustworthy and know what we really think by talking about what we think since childhood and allowing many people to correct our thinking and correct other people’s possible incorrect assumptions, than preferring people to not be trusting. It’s always better for our engines to work on optimism rather than pessimism about the “unhappiness” of others when they make their own choices how they like.
26 January, 2017 at 12:27 am #1020534Bloody Hell lolol
Reading Mr Gobshyte (our UK version of President Gobshyte) and Confucius-with-Dementia keeps making me laugh.
It’s like a Samuel Beckett play – Estragon and Lucky commenting on the issues of the world.
This is the way a thread ends, this is the way a thread ends, this is the way a thread ends, not with a bang but in Bedlam. (with apologies to Mr Eliot)
26 January, 2017 at 12:34 am #1020535I really don’t understand why people are afraid of the “Sharia law” when they don’t even know what it stands for? All they know is what the media has chosen to spread, making Saudi Arabia and the extremist groups as the representatives of Islam, when the first is mostly governed by traditions and the second use religion to get other purposes than valuating Islam, just like the extremist groups in any other religion. Before talking about hatred, terrorism and pedophilia in Islam just take some time and read about it with open mind, not making prejudice from afar.
Peace
1 member liked this post.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!