-
Posts
-
Post a random picture with no verifiable source and claim it is evidence. Make a provocative statement just to (provoke) elicit a response, rinse and repeat for the next 20 pages. Got to love the Justchat boards. Like a hamster on wheel! Chug Chug!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/20/anti-donald-trump-activists-try-block-access-inauguration/ Google is hard
Google also states there are aliens and one legged leprechauns living in Mongolia. If you attempted this ruse in any academic setting, you would be laughed out the building. Plus these faux pas debates just don’t cut the muster anyway and are merely a front for your overt Islamophobia.
Google also states there are aliens and one legged leprechauns living in Mongolia. If you attempted this ruse in any academic setting, you would be laughed out the building. Plus these faux pas debates just don’t cut the muster anyway and are merely a front for your overt Islamophobia.
Yes, because the standards of rigour in modern academic literature is so high.
I’ve read a lot worse papers than that one, but its the only one I had a link to on hand.
“Other literature tackles emotional, psychological, and sexual interactions with glaciers.” (Pp 18)
Google also states there are aliens and one legged leprechauns living in Mongolia. If you attempted this ruse in any academic setting, you would be laughed out the building. Plus these faux pas debates just don’t cut the muster anyway and are merely a front for your overt Islamophobia.
Yes, because the standards of rigour in modern academic literature is so high. I’ve read a lot worse papers than that one, but its the only one I had a link to on hand. “Other literature tackles emotional, psychological, and sexual interactions with glaciers.” (Pp 18)
I recommend not getting into a relationship with a glacier, it won’t go anywhere and ultimately all you will end up with is frostbite and a broken heart.
Sorry to break the bad news.
1 member liked this post.
that march was 2 million strong – it dwarfed the Chump inaugural ceremonies. Great!
The protest in Chicago was so big that the organisers had to give up the march part of the event. In Washington, there were so many people that the overflow just swamped the downtown areas.
The violence you showed was of a small group of anarchists breaking windows during the Friday inaugural. It was a very tiny part of the protests generally.
You rely too much on the smear tactics of Chump’s pals at Breitbart, drac. These tactics have a long tradition in US right-wing paranoia – look at Joe McCarthy, whose supporters doctored photographs to show that their opponents were secret Communists (one of them claimed that President Eisenhower was the top KGB agen in the USA!).
These nut tactics are not uncommon in America, which has a paranoid strain it its political makeup. They don’t go down well with most Brits – we’re too phlegmatic. So far, anyway.
that march was 2 million strong – it dwarfed the Chump inaugural ceremonies. Great! The protest in Chicago was so big that the organisers had to give up the march part of the event. In Washington, there were so many people that the overflow just swamped the downtown areas.
I don’t understand why people care about the size of Trump’s crowd size. D.C. voted 92% Clinton, and it was raining. So it would be expected that not many people there wanted to attend.
The violence you showed was of a small group of anarchists breaking windows during the Friday inaugural. It was a very tiny part of the protests generally.
That was more of a joke than a serious point, but its interesting that you don’t refer to them as communists, which they were.
You rely too much on the smear tactics of Chump’s pals at Breitbart, drac. These tactics have a long tradition in US right-wing paranoia – look at Joe McCarthy, whose supporters doctored photographs to show that their opponents were secret Communists (one of them claimed that President Eisenhower was the top KGB agen in the USA!). These nut tactics are not uncommon in America, which has a paranoid strain it its political makeup. They don’t go down well with most Brits – we’re too phlegmatic. So far, anyway.
I don’t see how pointing out that the organiser of the Washington protests said recently that “Saudi Arabia is a good example of women’s rights, and that it puts the US to shame” is a paranoid thing to do.
Attachments:
1 member liked this post.
I have to get back to work now, so I won’t be able to reply until about 1am UK time.
that march was 2 million strong – it dwarfed the Chump inaugural ceremonies. Great! The protest in Chicago was so big that the organisers had to give up the march part of the event. In Washington, there were so many people that the overflow just swamped the downtown areas.
I don’t understand why people care about the size of Trump’s crowd size. D.C. voted 92% Clinton, and it was raining. So it would be expected that not many people there wanted to attend.
And that is all the Trump White House needed to say. What did they say, though?
Kennedy was inaugurated in snow.
Inauguration date is usually bad weather – it’s the time of year.
And inaugurations attract large numbers of people from across the nation, not just one city.
To me what matters is the size of the demonstrations. They show the genuine disgust and worry of a surprising number of people at the very beginning of Chump’s term in office.
You seem obsessed with Communists. The pictures were of anarchists – the tv showed them carrying black flags. Anarchists carry black flags; Communists carry red flags. The characters are everywhere in tiny numbers; they are idiots. In Britain, there is a group called Class War which carries these things out – or they did once. I’m not up-to-date with who does it now.
Who was on the Organising Committee? I’d be shocked if there were only one organiser!! Does the red-baiting Muslim-sniffing Breitbart have anything on the others? As SHR pointed out, finding one Muslim in Wembley football stadium during a big match doesn’t mean that the football league is run by jihadis.
And that is all the Trump White House needed to say. What did they say, though?
That is a fair point, they should have handled it better.
Kennedy was inaugurated in snow.
Inauguration date is usually bad weather – it’s the time of year.
And inaugurations attract large numbers of people from across the nation, not just one city.
Most of the people will be from the city though, other people have jobs to attend or can’t afford transport costs.
To me what matters is the size of the demonstrations. They show the genuine disgust and worry of a surprising number of people at the very beginning of Chump’s term in office.
How did he manage to win the election if so many people are hostile to him then? I think you will find it a very vocal minority.
You seem obsessed with Communists. The pictures were of anarchists – the tv showed them carrying black flags. Anarchists carry black flags; Communists carry red flags. The characters are everywhere in tiny numbers; they are idiots. In Britain, there is a group called Class War which carries these things out – or they did once. I’m not up-to-date with who does it now.
I’m not obsessed with them, it is just a fact that they were communists. You can deny reality if you like, but the flags were clearly the half red, half black flags of anarcho-communism. There were also a few Antifa flags.
Who was on the Organising Committee? I’d be shocked if there were only one organiser!! Does the red-baiting Muslim-sniffing Breitbart have anything on the others? As SHR pointed out, finding one Muslim in Wembley football stadium during a big match doesn’t mean that the football league is run by jihadis.
Okay, i’m convinced you are deliberately misreading my posts. Being the primary organiser and public face of a movement is very different than a random person who is attending it. She is widely reported as being a major part of it:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/women-march-on-washington-organizers_us_58407ee8e4b017f37fe388d1
http://www.vox.com/identities/2016/11/21/13651804/women-march-washington-trump-inauguration
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/why-hundreds-of-thousands-are-joining-the-womens-march-w461332
http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2017/01/09/women-and-their-march-on-washington/my-feelings-about-the-womens-march-have-evolvedAll of the above list her as one of three leaders.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!