-
Posts
-
But in a world where such criticisms were never made, where people were encouraged to ignore the irresponsible parenting, never mention it and “feel” for the parents such things would be far more common than in a world where all justifiable criticism was voiced without reproach
You say what about the b’stards who did this to her, well that IS the friggin parents, THEY left her alone and unsupervised in an unlocked hotel room in a strange country whilst they partied, THEY did it to her no different to if they had let her cross the road unsupervised, played with knives or explored crumbling mine shafts by herself
THEY were responsible for her safety, protection and wellbeing and THEY didnt even passably fulfill any of those obligations
Trying to claim they are blameless in this IS part of the reason so many parents ARE such crappy parents to begin with IMO
@drivel wrote:
It’s a sad state of affairs when folks can use all of their energy blaming the parents
As i mentioned about 20 pages previously – it’s the bastrd(s) who took her who are to blame
All you are doing is hitting an easy target – the parents will pay for their misjudgement for the rest of their livesIt’s easy to make a mistake – thankfully nothing much usually comes of them
Misjudgement? How about negligence. I,d hardly call what they did a misjudgement. They did it of their own free will. And your wrong. It,s Maddie who is paying the full price for this bloody fiasco, probably with her life. All because they thought more of their own pleasures than the wellbeing and saftey of their children.
I think the mc canns are worried about coming back to the uk as they may well be interviewed by social servises about leaving their children alone, indeed if the incident had occured here in the uk the response would have been very different. if they had been a family living on benefits on holiday in blackpool and the same had happened they would have been hung out to dry by the papers. the only difference is the mccanns are relativeley wealthy so they can get away with abusing and abandoning their offspring. the pity they try to keep churning is getting harder to keep up when they realise that people actually want to know why they left their babies alone. im only grateful that all the babies werent taken. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
I have to say I laugh everytime I hear them bleat out the “yes, we were naive” line concerning what THEY did, naive FFS?
That would fit were we talking about them buying into a time share that didnt exist, or giving someone money to do some building work that never got done but their friggin daughter is missing probably dead, naive just dont cut the mustard one iota
They WERE negligent, they WERE selfishly irresponsible, they WERENT being and might never have been “fit parents” and they DO deserve every single bit of criticism they have to endure for the entire rest of their lives
As for social services here, the country they are in classes leaving children under 10 alone as a crime often punishable with jail, I think we should have a similar law here really called “Maddies law”
I also think they are deliberately putting off returning to the UK, but not because of social services tho, I think its either because of not wanting to face family and friends, not wanting to face the reaction they will get from people who recognise them on the street and still possibly because if it turns out they had something more than negligence to do with it they will be in jail, but whilst abroad they could possibly try to claim asylum or run to a country without an extradition treaty
@ubermik wrote:
I have to say I laugh everytime I hear them bleat out the “yes, we were naive” line concerning what THEY did, naive FFS?
That would fit were we talking about them buying into a time share that didnt exist, or giving someone money to do some building work that never got done but their friggin daughter is missing probably dead, naive just dont cut the mustard one iota
They WERE negligent, they WERE selfishly irresponsible, they WERENT being and might never have been “fit parents” and they DO deserve every single bit of criticism they have to endure for the entire rest of their lives
As for social services here, the country they are in classes leaving children under 10 alone as a crime often punishable with jail, I think we should have a similar law here really called “Maddies law”
I also think they are deliberately putting off returning to the UK, but not because of social services tho, I think its either because of not wanting to face family and friends, not wanting to face the reaction they will get from people who recognise them on the street and still possibly because if it turns out they had something more than negligence to do with it they will be in jail, but whilst abroad they could possibly try to claim asylum or run to a country without an extradition treaty
I agree with everything you said there uber.
@bat wrote:
@ubermik wrote:
I have to say I laugh everytime I hear them bleat out the “yes, we were naive” line concerning what THEY did, naive FFS?
That would fit were we talking about them buying into a time share that didnt exist, or giving someone money to do some building work that never got done but their friggin daughter is missing probably dead, naive just dont cut the mustard one iota
They WERE negligent, they WERE selfishly irresponsible, they WERENT being and might never have been “fit parents” and they DO deserve every single bit of criticism they have to endure for the entire rest of their lives
As for social services here, the country they are in classes leaving children under 10 alone as a crime often punishable with jail, I think we should have a similar law here really called “Maddies law”
I also think they are deliberately putting off returning to the UK, but not because of social services tho, I think its either because of not wanting to face family and friends, not wanting to face the reaction they will get from people who recognise them on the street and still possibly because if it turns out they had something more than negligence to do with it they will be in jail, but whilst abroad they could possibly try to claim asylum or run to a country without an extradition treaty
I agree with everything you said there uber.
I think here alone you have two very good reasons for not returning to this country. Fishwives like yourselves who think they have the whole case sewn up because they have watched a few news reports on TV and read column after colomn of so called ” facts” in the tabloids or the internet.
Fortunately our legal system doesnt listen to the baying calls of blood from make shift vigilantes like yourselves but will look at all the evidence piece by piece and fact by fact and at the end of a long drawn-out process a decision shall be made about who is actually guilty or not.
Well whatever has happened to little Maddie McCann, all my instincts are that the culprit will turn out to be somebody “close to home”.
The more I see of the publicity seeking, the money raising (over £1 million now), the constant media appearances, visits to Church – not to mention audiences with the Pope – the more I think of distraction from the central theme of all this.
Why paticularly Maddie???? Why not some other child, either before or since??? Why when she was apparently only left alone for a short time and apparently only on the one occasion????
I have a really bad feeling about all of this….. we shall see huh??
@fastcars wrote:
@bat wrote:
@ubermik wrote:
I have to say I laugh everytime I hear them bleat out the “yes, we were naive” line concerning what THEY did, naive FFS?
That would fit were we talking about them buying into a time share that didnt exist, or giving someone money to do some building work that never got done but their friggin daughter is missing probably dead, naive just dont cut the mustard one iota
They WERE negligent, they WERE selfishly irresponsible, they WERENT being and might never have been “fit parents” and they DO deserve every single bit of criticism they have to endure for the entire rest of their lives
As for social services here, the country they are in classes leaving children under 10 alone as a crime often punishable with jail, I think we should have a similar law here really called “Maddies law”
I also think they are deliberately putting off returning to the UK, but not because of social services tho, I think its either because of not wanting to face family and friends, not wanting to face the reaction they will get from people who recognise them on the street and still possibly because if it turns out they had something more than negligence to do with it they will be in jail, but whilst abroad they could possibly try to claim asylum or run to a country without an extradition treaty
I agree with everything you said there uber.
I think here alone you have two very good reasons for not returning to this country. Fishwives like yourselves who think they have the whole case sewn up because they have watched a few news reports on TV and read column after colomn of so called ” facts” in the tabloids or the internet.
Fortunately our legal system doesnt listen to the baying calls of blood from make shift vigilantes like yourselves but will look at all the evidence piece by piece and fact by fact and at the end of a long drawn-out process a decision shall be made about who is actually guilty or not.
Fasty the most glaringly obvious “fact” in all this bloody fiasco is the fact that it is entirely Maddies “parents” fault. None of this would ever have happened in the first place if they had excersised their basic parental duties and not left their 3 kids, ALONE, in an unlocked apartment in the first damn place. Wether or not they played any part in Maddies demise remains to be seen, but if anyone is guilty of anything, them two have got in ingraved on their foreheads in capital letters.
And who are you calling a fishwife? :evil:Maybe he didnt actually mean you WERE a fish wife, he might have merely meant that you seem like you would make rumpity pumpity like a wife (ie mind numbingly boringly and infrequently (which would ONLY apply to her hubby obviously :lol: )) and that you equally infrequently change your cheese wire lacy goo collectors hence the “fishy” part
So it might not have been anywhere near as bad as actually meaning you were married to a fish :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
@ubermik wrote:
Maybe he didnt actually mean you WERE a fish wife, he might have merely meant that you seem like you would make rumpity pumpity like a wife (ie mind numbingly boringly and infrequently (which would ONLY apply to her hubby obviously :lol: )) and that you equally infrequently change your cheese wire lacy goo collectors hence the “fishy” part
So it might not have been anywhere near as bad as actually meaning you were married to a fish :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
Oh gee thanks a lot. So now, not only am I a fishwife, I,m also mind numblinly boring and I wear cheeswire!! FFS. I feel great now. Thanks a lot….**** head. :lol:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!