Mc Canns are being framed

If your theory is correct Bat, and she was involved in Maddies disapperance, dont you think that she would “deliberately” turn on the water works for the cameras to avoid suspicion??

Shes an intelligent lady (must be to have made it as a doctor) If she is guilty, as you say, surely shes smart enough to work out that by NOT crying she’s drawing attention to herself and to avoid suspicion would do exactly what you say “you would do” in the situation which is to break down in front of the worlds media, just for effect?

….. assuming that they did actually leave their children alone and unprotected. But then if they were complicit in the death of Maddie and the disposal or concealment of her body afterwards … they only left two children alone and unprotected.

@drivel wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

Just out of curiosity Drivel – what theories are there behind 11/11?

I was trying to add a spice of humour to a topic that has gone well OTT in here – but the fact remains that most of the hysterical anti_McCanns are the same people who hold the ridculous conspiracy theories – says something about the kind of folks they are !!!!

Open minded ones with the ability to think freely is a good description with many of the rather ludicrous cover stories the majority of people brainwashed into swallowing without question

If something cant stand up to scrutiny it doesnt deserve to be regarded as believable, and when the powers that be discourage something being questioned that alone is more than enough reason to question it meticulously

And when the weight of respected scientific opinion at least equals or outstrips the “accepted” explaination it becomes a combination of naiveity, stupidity and fear not to question things

@drivel wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@drivel wrote:

@johnboy25 wrote:

Just out of curiosity Drivel – what theories are there behind 11/11?

I was trying to add a spice of humour to a topic that has gone well OTT in here – but the fact remains that most of the hysterical anti_McCanns are the same people who hold the ridculous conspiracy theories – says something about the kind of folks they are !!!!

Open minded ones with the ability to think freely is a good description with many of the rather ludicrous cover stories the majority of people brainwashed into swallowing without question

If something cant stand up to scrutiny it doesnt deserve to be regarded as believable, and when the powers that be discourage something being questioned that alone is more than enough reason to question it meticulously

And when the weight of respected scientific opinion at least equals or outstrips the “accepted” explaination it becomes a combination of naiveity, stupidity and fear not to question things

And all the unbelievable conspiracy theories ??? created by whackos !!!!!
it’s mind numbing Uber – surely you have more intelligence than that

But what is “unbelievable”??

At one point it was unbelievable that the world could be round, it was unbelievable that something like watergate could happen, it was unbelievable that we could land on the moon, and to some still is lol :lol:

The thing here is that some theories ARE observations of factual high level conspiracies, some with mal intent and some simply because the average joe doesnt need to know all the facts and probably wouldnt grasp the complexities anyway, some are indeed complete whacko notions and some are a mixture of both

But to assume anything called a conspiracy theory is whack is the real idiocy, each should stand or fall on its own merits and many wont be able to be conclusively proven one way or the other meaning its niether fact nor whack in a factually indisputeable sense

Luckily for the powers that be the mass majority are good sheep, they wont and in many cases arent capable of questioning or forming their own views so over time the need to hide actual conspiracies has declined and the ability of the population to not want to, or not be able to question what they are told has increased proportionately

So now we are at the stage where some of the actual genuine conspiracies are huger and harder to believe than some of the ficticious demented theories of yesteryear

And as long as so many people believe something is nonsense just because the powers that be attach the label of “conspiracy theory” the actual conspiracies will continiue to be more overt and increase in magnitude and exagerations or dimminuitive claims will also continue to increase in an eviroment that means they dont have to be susbtantiated due to never being questioned en masse

One of the best examples I’ve seen to date which to be honest I would have ridiculed myself perhaps 5-10 years ago is this one

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=3983706668483511310&q=hiv+duration%3Along&total=255&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=7

The “ludicrous demented conspiracy theory” seems to have far more corroborative evidence and actual scientific fact to back it up than the accepted political theory and yet its still classed as almost heracy just to question its validity

Some times the bigger the lie the easier it is to get away with as people are less likely or inclined to think something so huge could be a lie, so if you want the day off work on cup day rather than saying you have sickness and diorhea saying a relative died of a heart attack the night before is far more believable as an example

Infact as for

@drivel wrote:

surely you have more intelligence than that

Surely actual intelligence is the use of the mind? The ability to open mindedly look at all sides of an issue without prejudice and formulate a unique perspective and opinion?

Dismissing something merely because loads of people tell you its hogwash is hardly a sign of intelligence or thinking on any level, its simply following pre programmed social conditioning to do as one is told

After all, no harm comes from questioning and scrutinising such things, infact even with totally nonsensical ones it can be quite a laugh or interesting on various levels. Yet many fight against even looking at any opposing evidence as tho they are scared their perspective might be altered and will ridicule and criticise things they havent and wont even look at first

Is THAT intelligence? Or fear?