Mc Canns are being framed

Maybe that’s what the new evidence is – all this talk about DNA could be a diversion.

No, my point is that maybe they didn’t find anything in the boot. Maybe they’re already looking at fraud and embezzlement charges and begged the portugeese police to provide a cover story so’s not to make things any worse for them.

Backfired a bit.

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

The parents of Madeleine McCann are considering commissioning independent forensic tests on the hire car that they used in Portugal. This will be interesting.

Portuguese police have played down reports that DNA evidence with a 100% match to Madeleine was found in the car. Doh! seems like the media got it wrong eh.

As for the large quantity of hair supposedly found hmm

Just a word of advice, dont believe everything you read in the papers

Thing is tho, as much as some might feel the need to act all smug and pious the laws governing the media and their sourcing of information do dictate that each piece of information SHOULD be obtained from two sustainable and independant sources at least

So what is stated as fact rather than just supposition should infact be quite trustworthy, and if it turns out not to be then any assumptions or theories based on the reporting of those alleged “facts” werent eroneous or random at the point of conception as the media commentary is the only thing ANYONE has to go on regardless of which side of the fence they sit on

And that media coverage has been as flaky with the aspects supporting the possibility they might be innocent as it has been supporting the the possibility they might be guilty, so overt displays of “I told you so” syndrome look just a bit silly and immature really when the same person hasnt equally applied that to the disparagy linked to the other side of the list of possibles too

At any point in time whats seen so far is all that can be used to base a hypothesis, as more is known or what was thought to be known is undermined that hypothesis can change, thats nothing amazing or gloatworthy to all but the simple minded, its just the format of theorising with an open mind

But when incongruencies are clearly visible in the support or derision of all possible theories nothing much really changes till the final analysis is known

And as for “Just a word of advice, dont believe everything you read in the papers” Why are you even posting on here then? Because obviously if thats to be followed she hasnt actually gone missing at all has she? Or do you just selectively believe what you want to believe and ignore what doesnt fit in with your initial knee jerk assumptions?

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

Uber you lost your right to criticise anyones comments on here after your disgusting comments yesterday

PMSL, obviously not or you wouldnt have had a post to respond to now would ya duhbrain

And as for “disgusting comments”, disgusting is a subjective and personal definition, not an objective nor univeral one, just because you were too dimwitted to understand what I did or didnt say in the “disgusting” post niether makes it disgusting by definition nor relevant to any other post I may write

thats the nature of a “right” petal, some of your posts have totally lacked any form of cohesion, grasp of the gramatical technicalities of english not even the faintest glimmer of logic, but that also doesnt remove your “right” to post even more eroneous illogical dross does it? Or do you think your in someway “special” in a different way to the one that gets you a carer to wipe your drool and tie your laces for you?

But just to clarify that, if you said “boobs” and I said that was a “disgusting comment” would you agree? Would your agreement or disagreement have any validity? Would my initial opinion on its “disgustingness” have any relevance? The answer to all of those is a quite resounding NO!

So firstly I couldnt really give a flying penetrative gesture what your opinion of the joke yesterday was as your opinion is about as relveant and important to me as people starving in africa or whether the queen wakes up tomorrow, IE not in the slightest, its ONLY important to you

If you dont have an actual valid sensible response to a post try either just stating that and conceeding the point or saying nothing, coz calling the poster a poo poo face or other names just makes you look like a twonk luv

Frankly Uber you have gone even lower in my estimations by trying to justify what you posted yesterday.

And even lower than that by criticising another member who dared to criticise you!

There was no justification for what you posted yesterday and I for one wont be reading anymore of your replies nor entertaining your warped mind with any replies.

I expected you to apologise for what you did, or at least carry on without trying to make light and fun out of it, not turn it on its head like its somebody elses problem for not understanding it.

Kick this guy off.