-
Posts
-
@Bad Manners wrote:
A well thought out theory, even if I dont believe a word of it.
Couple of places it falls totally flat. One is moving the “body” from it’s first location to the 2nd. There are Media on these people 24hrs a day. after the 1st day. This does litertally mean 24 hours a day. They wouldent have been able to get to their front gate without the Media being on them. Media would have been covering every single door, every single access point.
It’s hard to see them being able to move the “body” to a more secure location.I’ll take your word for it that no third party witness saw her after she went home that day. I cant really remember reading if anyone did or not. Are you sure that no other third party saw her after that time? If someone did then the theory’s totally blown apart.
I do know of 2 people who certainly would have known this. Her Brother and Sister. One part I do know is that Kate said to Portugese Police that she made Dinner for the 3 of them, after they came home.
I quite understand that you won’t buy into my theory – but hey, I’m not a supporter of the McCanns are innocent team…. quite the opposite.
Let me add a bit to my theory (in response to your comments above).
Yes, towards the end of the ‘McCanns are innocent phase’ of the story, the Media were all over them like a rash. But for the first few weeks the McCanns themselves (i.e. personally) were not the story, Maddie and the hunt for her was the story.
If you remember, all the focus was on the ineptitude of the police,; how they failed to close the border with Spain; the alleged presence of an international paedophile ring operating in that part of Europe; worldwide sightings that were definitely Maddie,; Robert Murat was then announced to be a ‘suspect’; Media were tearing around focused totally on this new development. The Media wasn’t looking closely into the McCans at THAT time – i.e. for several weeks after May 3rd.
I reckon that there were plenty of opportunities for them to slip away without being followed. I’ve suggested that they may have set up a pattern of popping out for a drive on their own a few times, just to get everybody used to them doing it. Then once any suspicions were allayed, and once they were satisfied that they wern’t being followed ….. they visit the temporary site and move the body to a more permanent site.
God knows where that could be …. only those that moved it will probably ever know. (Bit like the Moors murderers in this respect – neither one of them have ever owned up fully to disposing of the bodies of the poor little children they murdered or indeed where they were concealed).
The timeline of events on May 3rd is also quite interesting. In today’s Telegraph a fuller timeline has been constructed based on the McCann’s own statements and those of key witnesses.
Maddie was last definitively seen at around 2.30pm on May 3rd playing beside the pool with her family and the other families in the Ocean Club resort.
Several accounts claim that the McCann family went back to their apartment around 6.00pm or so …. but there are no definitive witness who can confirm this exactly.
7.00pm – The McCanns said that this was the time that all three children were put to bed (we only have their unsupported word for this time).
8.30pm – The McCanns arrive at the bar for their ‘night out’ away from their children.
9.05pm – Gerry McCann leaves the bar apparently to check on the children.
10.00pm – Kate McCann leaves the bar to visit the apartment.
10.14pm – Kate McCann rushes into the bar shouting “They’ve taken her, they’ve taken her.”
11.05pm – Police log shows that this is the time that they received the first call reporting that a child is mising.
Of course we can never KNOW what actually happened in the cricial period between around 6.00pm and 8.30pm …. but there was plenty of time for the events suggested in my theory to have taken place.
10.00pm – Kate McCann leaves the bar to visit the apartment.
10.14pm – Kate McCann rushes into the bar shouting “They’ve taken her, they’ve taken her.”
PB does that mean she got there an back in 14 minutes? not a long time is it? now im beginning to wonder bout that, how does someone walk to the apartment, check the kids, run around to look where maddie had gone AND get back to the restaraunt in that time? hmmmmmm
You obviously know the layout of the Resturant and Apartment Complex then Cath?
How long do you reckon it should have taken her then with your detailed knowledge of the Locale?
@Bad Manners wrote:
You obviously know the layout of the Resturant and Apartment Complex then Cath?
How long do you reckon it should have taken her then with your detailed knowledge of the Locale?
hey bm just going on whats already reported, i dont condemm nor do i yet have any opinion on guilty or not guilty, its just some of it doesnt seem to add up, its already been said that the complex was a little more than ‘5mins’ away to walk to , like i said just looking at whats been said already and asking a question xx
Well have a look at this bit of breaking news. How are they going to explain that then? Also I heard on sky today that when the police asked Mrs McCann the 22 questions that they asked her and McCann senior, she was extreemly reluctant to answer at least 20 of them. Now if they are so “innocent” and determined to do everything possible to prove it is so, why won,t she answer the questions?
@bat wrote:
Well have a look at this bit of breaking news. How are they going to explain that then? Also I heard on sky today that when the police asked Mrs McCann the 22 questions that they asked her and McCann senior, she was extreemly reluctant to answer at least 20 of them. Now if they are so “innocent” and determined to do everything possible to prove it is so, why won,t she answer the questions?
Probably cos shes sick and tired of the whole thing! Just like the rest of us! :twisted:
“Body fluids” …. as in fluids leaked from a cadaver eh??? I wonder what the self-appointed McCann defence team will make of THAT !!!!!
(I expect they will make the usual demands for proof … stating that the police must have framed them …. the McCanns couldn’t possibly have done anything like this – they are doctors ffs ….not got a nasty bone in their body ….. loved their children and were exceptionally good and caring parents etc etc.)
I agree with you, the police do seem to be applying pressure to encourage a confession.
This is an old trick with the police, although they do not appear to have a clue they apply pressure just to break people and get a confession.It matters not that they may be innocent, that they have lost their child; just get a confession come what may to close the book on it.
No one can know the truth not the perverse, the cynical or anyone else until the case is investigated in an intelligent and proper fashion.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!