Boards Index General discussion Getting serious Mc Canns are being framed

Viewing 10 posts - 101 through 110 (of 276 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #286848

    @r.O.T.T wrote:

    ……dead bodies dont bleed ……..

    As it happens that statement is factually incorrect. Dead bodies ‘leak’ large amounts of ‘bodily fluids’ particularly as decomposition starts to advance.

    These fluids include (amongst other things) blood and it is absolutely possible to get an indisputable DNA match from this.

    It is extraordinarily difficult to move a dead body without some leakage of fluids – as would appear to be the case here.

    #286849

    4 DAYS AND A BODY SMELLS…

    ouch,,25 days in a portugral heat the body would be rotted..a distinct smell..

    she got (kate) the smell o death as she is a GP

    #286850

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @r.O.T.T wrote:

    ……dead bodies dont bleed ……..

    As it happens that statement is factually incorrect. Dead bodies ‘leak’ large amounts of ‘bodily fluids’ particularly as decomposition starts to advance.

    These fluids include (amongst other things) blood and it is absolutely possible to get an indisputable DNA match from this.

    It is extraordinarily difficult to move a dead body without some leakage of fluids – as would appear to be the case here.

    This being the case, why was only a minute amount of DNA found? Surely if it was a dead body as is being suggested, there would’ve been more than just a smidgen of DNA present

    #286851

    hell aye :)
    a nippy kinda smell…pne where my daughter joked ” daddy is going off”
    as we made sure he was deoderised..and all farted on him !

    #286852

    @ubermik wrote:

    @esmeralda wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    @fastcars wrote:

    @fastcars wrote:

    Thats a fantastic idea PB…. lets bring them onto national TV… force them to confess to the worlds press that what they did was a huge mistake and how much they regretted it…. we could maybe stone them or even throw them into the local duck pond to see if they melt upon touching water…… maybe even hang them up on crosses held only by nails through their hands and feet … and if they then survive all this public hate and humility we can then take their other two children off them permanently just for good measure…. We could even build a huge JC bonfire where all the vultures from these boards could dance naked round effigies of the couple and stick pins in their eyes. Would make a fantastic media spectacle wouldnt it… :D

    And all the time the real perpetrator of this sad act will be sitting back with a large cocktail… feet up and a huge smile on his face for a job well done.

    @esmeralda wrote:

    With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
    A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

    You can see who the educated one is out of the two of us cant you… :lol:

    Thats a trick question yeah?

    Because an “educated” person would realise that niether innocence nor guilt can be “known” as theres no evidence to prove either, and that similarly innocence AND guilt are both just as likely possibilities

    An educated person would therefore accept that to ascertain either innocence or guilt the parents HAVE to be scrutinised and investigated to establish which is the case

    So therefore an “educated”, infact a “non moron” to be more acurate would know that they cant be above suspicion, that right from the start they are the ONLY real suspects and as such needed to be investigated thoroughly to either rule them out by proof or PROVE their guilt

    An “educated” person would niether claim they did it nor that they didnt as niether is known, but would accept they quite possibly MIGHT have done it and also MIGHT not which is as positive a statement as can be acurately maintained by anyone bar the Mcanns

    So maybe you need to look the word educated up in a dicheadtionary as you dont really seem to have the faintest idea what the word means lol

    Just my uneducated opinion of course you understand :lol:

    Hmm, you truly are thick if you are unable to assimilate that the contentious issue here concerns neither guilt nor innocence, but blood lust and schadenfreude. What a self important dolt you prove yourself to be, Uberprick.. the more so with every ill-conceived post. Keep ’em coming..I like a good snigger!

    And yet STRANGELY enough the actual discussion IS about whether or not, in peoples personal opinions they think they are indeed guilty or innocent, a point of fact that resounds in pretty much every single post, a point of fact YOU seem to think isnt anything at all to do with the topic at all :shock: Funny that lol

    I think before spouting empty headed diatribe you should first of all get your facts right tho, although I havent made a secret of the fact that I think they probably did have more to do with it and perhaps even deliberately killed her thats never, not once been expressed as “known”, and without that the phrase bloodlust is as out of place as a muslim at a bacon tasting contest

    But as per with your sort where you cant actually contradict a point thats made and where you technically dont have a counter point you sink to the rather laughable level of throwing personal insults as tho an irrelevant person on a web sites opinion has any meaning whatsoever lol, bless

    Point of fact here, the ONLY people exhibiting any narrow minded maliciously vehement misguided “bloodlust” are the criticisers of those who think they might have done it as they arent even capable of co-existing where someone has a differing opinion from theirs even when their opinion has no facts to support it and is therefore no more or less unfounded or proveable than any other opinion

    But I doubt you will find a single post on any of these threads from people who think they might have done it whinging and whining about people having the view they are innocent

    So it really is quite blatantly clear who the small minded insecure folks are just by that fact alone, otherwise they wouldnt be throwing such childish tizzy fits over the mere fact that the entire world doesnt agree with them

    As for sniggering feel free, simple folks snigger at pretty much anything anyway so its hardly anything for me to be concerned about after all is it now?

    As I say, Uberprick, your doltism flourishes with each and every post. For the hard of intelligence let me explain: The issue I was referring to was that of the malicious pleasure being taken in the misfortunes of others, by certain members of this forum and the delight with which you self-appointed members of the hang ’em and flog ’em judiciary hold court.
    Don’t even think about trying to outsmart me uberprick..it can’t be done!

    #286853

    @~Pebbles~ wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @r.O.T.T wrote:

    ……dead bodies dont bleed ……..

    As it happens that statement is factually incorrect. Dead bodies ‘leak’ large amounts of ‘bodily fluids’ particularly as decomposition starts to advance.

    These fluids include (amongst other things) blood and it is absolutely possible to get an indisputable DNA match from this.

    It is extraordinarily difficult to move a dead body without some leakage of fluids – as would appear to be the case here.

    This being the case, why was only a minute amount of DNA found? Surely if it was a dead body as is being suggested, there would’ve been more than just a smidgen of DNA present

    I don’t know … how could I??? All I know is what is published in the Media and that is that a small drop of blood was found in the boot of their hire car and this has now been PROVED to be Maddie’s blood.

    I can hazared a guess … and that is that the body was thoroughly wrapped in some sort of non-permeable wrapping (like plastic bin liners ) which contained practically all of the decomposition fluids.

    It may well be that the average member of the public would not have the knowledge required to deal with cadavers – but the McCanns are both qualified doctors and WOULD have that knowledge. But as I said … this is simply my guess.

    #286854

    It’s kinda looking like the Crime of The Century now PB.
    All in the space of a few hours, whilst holding it together knowing what they’d done. Wrapping the body, getting it into the old boot, and burying it totally out ot sight, without any preplanning of any kind. Then grabbing a quick coffee, before they rung the Police.
    You’re saying they did this all in the space of a few hours? Impressive.

    #286855

    The assumtion is that the DNA evidence is blood … anybody care take bets it’s not … and the planted DNA evidence can be easily explained … given the Police/Forensic having access to the apartment … and Madeline’s belongings.

    Don’t forget it would not be a 1st in regards Planted DNA by the Portuguese Police … .. read my original post re

    #286856

    and not forgetting they did not hire the car in question until 5 weeks later … hmmm very strange …. if only Sherlock Holmes was alive!

    #286857

    @Bad Manners wrote:

    It’s kinda looking like the Crime of The Century now PB.
    All in the space of a few hours, whilst holding it together knowing what they’d done. Wrapping the body, getting it into the old boot, and burying it totally out ot sight, without any preplanning of any kind. Then grabbing a quick coffee, before they rung the Police.
    You’re saying they did this all in the space of a few hours? Impressive.

    Yeah, I know that it sounds a bit difficult – but not as impossible as it at first seems. Ive thought about the ”how” in all this and I have a theory. It is ONLY a theory and is MY theory but this is how I think it works….. bear with me.

    We apparently know that the McCanns say that they put the children to bed sometime around 6.30 – 7.00 pm and that they apparently arrived at the bar to meet their friends around 8.00-8.30 – this from an assortment of Media reports etc etc.

    How about this ….. what if Maddie actually died earlier that day and wasn’t actually alive to be put to bed with the twins??? After all there appears to be no third party witness who saw her after she (presumably) went home with the rest of her family late in the afternoon.

    I don’t know how she died (how could I?) but what if she took some pills from somewhere within the apartment, swallowed them, thinking that they were ‘sweeties’, and they killed her???

    Parents now go into panic mode. What should they do??? What if the pills were ”illegal”? An autopsy would certainly discover this and professionally ruin the pair of them. So how about they think it through and decide that reporting it to the police is the last thing they want to do. They decide to cover up the whole thing and dispose of the body.

    There is plenty of time for them to work this out and set up a rapid plan to wrap the body thoroughly in say bin-liners; shove it into the boot of their car; and transport it out of the village and conceal it a few miles away. Maybe one of them does the transport and disposal bit whilst the other remains in the apartment – I don’t know.

    Now they need a ”story” to cover up the death and they come up with the idea of a mysterious abducter. Maybe they know that the local police are dozy, and rely on them being really slow off the mark (as was the case).

    To give the abduction story more credibility, they create a huge hue and cry, which is rapidly whipped up by the Media into a major event worldwide – so nobody suspects them and all eyes are on trying to find poor Maddie alive … believed to be kidnapped or in the hands of an international paedophile ring – or whatever.

    Any time that the Media goes ”off message” they rapidly bring it back by insisting that the focus is on finding Maddie alive somewhere….. and accuse the local police of being lazy and inept.

    Several weeks go by and maybe they wonder if the temporary hiding place for the corpse is really secure. So they hire a car … maybe do a few drives out into the country toghther, saying that they are seeking a bit of privacy from the Media so they can grieve etc..

    When they judge that the time is right, they move the body from its temporary hiding place to a more permanent place somewhere else – where they think it is more securely hidden or deeply buried. Either way they want to make certain that it is never found.

    This is when the blood from the body gets into the boot of the hired car- as it is moved from one place to the other.

    Now I know it is purely guess work on my part….. it is simply a theory – nothing more. But it sure has set me wondering if it could really have happened like this.

Viewing 10 posts - 101 through 110 (of 276 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!