Boards Index General discussion Getting serious Mc Canns are being framed

Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 276 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #286838

    ^^^^^ agrees

    #286839

    im sorry but i still think its a set up

    #286840

    NO WAY are they guilty….

    #286841

    <span style="font-size:0]DNA can be planted … dont forget the case where the mother was accused of killing her daughter … she was from Portugal … some years later the DNA found was found to be planted by the Police .. the case is well documented … any similarity … with the Mcannn’s … I bet[/size%;”>[/size]

    #286842

    @esmeralda wrote:

    @ubermik wrote:

    @fastcars wrote:

    @fastcars wrote:

    Thats a fantastic idea PB…. lets bring them onto national TV… force them to confess to the worlds press that what they did was a huge mistake and how much they regretted it…. we could maybe stone them or even throw them into the local duck pond to see if they melt upon touching water…… maybe even hang them up on crosses held only by nails through their hands and feet … and if they then survive all this public hate and humility we can then take their other two children off them permanently just for good measure…. We could even build a huge JC bonfire where all the vultures from these boards could dance naked round effigies of the couple and stick pins in their eyes. Would make a fantastic media spectacle wouldnt it… :D

    And all the time the real perpetrator of this sad act will be sitting back with a large cocktail… feet up and a huge smile on his face for a job well done.

    @esmeralda wrote:

    With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
    A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

    You can see who the educated one is out of the two of us cant you… :lol:

    Thats a trick question yeah?

    Because an “educated” person would realise that niether innocence nor guilt can be “known” as theres no evidence to prove either, and that similarly innocence AND guilt are both just as likely possibilities

    An educated person would therefore accept that to ascertain either innocence or guilt the parents HAVE to be scrutinised and investigated to establish which is the case

    So therefore an “educated”, infact a “non moron” to be more acurate would know that they cant be above suspicion, that right from the start they are the ONLY real suspects and as such needed to be investigated thoroughly to either rule them out by proof or PROVE their guilt

    An “educated” person would niether claim they did it nor that they didnt as niether is known, but would accept they quite possibly MIGHT have done it and also MIGHT not which is as positive a statement as can be acurately maintained by anyone bar the Mcanns

    So maybe you need to look the word educated up in a dicheadtionary as you dont really seem to have the faintest idea what the word means lol

    Just my uneducated opinion of course you understand :lol:

    Hmm, you truly are thick if you are unable to assimilate that the contentious issue here concerns neither guilt nor innocence, but blood lust and schadenfreude. What a self important dolt you prove yourself to be, Uberprick.. the more so with every ill-conceived post. Keep ’em coming..I like a good snigger!

    And yet STRANGELY enough the actual discussion IS about whether or not, in peoples personal opinions they think they are indeed guilty or innocent, a point of fact that resounds in pretty much every single post, a point of fact YOU seem to think isnt anything at all to do with the topic at all :shock: Funny that lol

    I think before spouting empty headed diatribe you should first of all get your facts right tho, although I havent made a secret of the fact that I think they probably did have more to do with it and perhaps even deliberately killed her thats never, not once been expressed as “known”, and without that the phrase bloodlust is as out of place as a muslim at a bacon tasting contest

    But as per with your sort where you cant actually contradict a point thats made and where you technically dont have a counter point you sink to the rather laughable level of throwing personal insults as tho an irrelevant person on a web sites opinion has any meaning whatsoever lol, bless

    Point of fact here, the ONLY people exhibiting any narrow minded maliciously vehement misguided “bloodlust” are the criticisers of those who think they might have done it as they arent even capable of co-existing where someone has a differing opinion from theirs even when their opinion has no facts to support it and is therefore no more or less unfounded or proveable than any other opinion

    But I doubt you will find a single post on any of these threads from people who think they might have done it whinging and whining about people having the view they are innocent

    So it really is quite blatantly clear who the small minded insecure folks are just by that fact alone, otherwise they wouldnt be throwing such childish tizzy fits over the mere fact that the entire world doesnt agree with them

    As for sniggering feel free, simple folks snigger at pretty much anything anyway so its hardly anything for me to be concerned about after all is it now?

    #286843

    @28ggr wrote:

    :!: Has News reporting going bonkers, how can the news editors even consider broadcasting such claptrap – re finding matching DNA evidence belonging to Madeline found in a Hire Car 5 weeks after her disappearance.

    Has common sense flown out of the window, how in heaven’s name could this be factual, when the parents were under constant observation and scrutiny at all times.

    Have we all forgotten what happened when a local girl was snatched some years ago, only for the mother to be accused of killing her. It was later found the evidence was planted by the Police.

    Would it not be ironic if we are looking at the same scenario, planted DNA.

    Egg on who’s faces afterwards, News Reporting has a responsibility to broadcast true and factual information, not pie in the sky nonsense
    :(

    An interesting theory – but if it was planted by the police, you’d have to consider how it could be done.

    It would mean that the police would have had to have access to Maddie’s blood BEFORE she was allegedly abducted, in order to have it available to be planted AFTERWARDS.

    As nobody knew that she was going to be (allegedly) abducted beforehand, there would be no reason to collect her blood in order to plant it subsequently.

    Just because we none of us know just what the McCanns movements were, either just before Maddie’s demise, or for long periods afterwards …. it doesn’t mean that they couldn’t have retrieved her body from wherever and moved it in the boot of their hire car.

    #286844

    aye….schadenfreude..

    the ability to see the “darker” and puede repetir ( repeat) the damm joke.

    i love you Esme x

    #286845

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @sharongooner wrote:

    A full DNA match.

    Dont mean anything. Her DNA was all over everything she, her parents, her brothers and sisters ever touched

    As I understand this DNA match Sharon – it has now been DNA proved that the BLOOD found in the boot of the McCanns hire car was Maddies BLOOD – not hairs or skin cells etc etc but her blood.

    The McCanns hired this car weeks AFTER they reported to the world that she had been abducted by somebody from their apartment.

    It is stretching the bounds of incredulity to suggest that this blood somehow was deposited somewhere BEFORE she was allegedly abducted and several weeks later was somehow transferred from ….er …. something, into the BOOT of a hire car.

    I mean – come on, how gullible does one have to be to buy this as an excuse.

    There is every chance that secondary transfer of her DNA could have occured. DNA’s so sensitive that if two people meet in the street, and shake hands, and then one commits a crime, they could possibly leave the other persons DNA at the scene.

    This blood could be secondary transfer. Kids cut themselves all the time.

    #286846

    nonsence…ok lets digress..

    a hired car,,25 days on and were talkin serious decomposition ..

    NO WAY!

    #286847

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    @28ggr wrote:

    :!: Has News reporting going bonkers, how can the news editors even consider broadcasting such claptrap – re finding matching DNA evidence belonging to Madeline found in a Hire Car 5 weeks after her disappearance.

    Has common sense flown out of the window, how in heaven’s name could this be factual, when the parents were under constant observation and scrutiny at all times.

    Have we all forgotten what happened when a local girl was snatched some years ago, only for the mother to be accused of killing her. It was later found the evidence was planted by the Police.

    Would it not be ironic if we are looking at the same scenario, planted DNA.

    Egg on who’s faces afterwards, News Reporting has a responsibility to broadcast true and factual information, not pie in the sky nonsense
    :(

    An interesting theory – but if it was planted by the police, you’d have to consider how it could be done.

    It would mean that the police would have had to have access to Maddie’s blood BEFORE she was allegedly abducted, in order to have it available to be planted AFTERWARDS.

    As nobody knew that she was going to be (allegedly) abducted beforehand, there would be no reason to collect her blood in order to plant it subsequently.

    Just because we none of us know just what the McCanns movements were, either just before Maddie’s demise, or for long periods afterwards …. it doesn’t mean that they couldn’t have retrieved her body from wherever and moved it in the boot of their hire car.

    As I understand it, the police apparantly found Maddies blood on a window sill in the apartment, thereby giving them a sample of her DNA.

    And as for retrieving the body and placing it in the boot of a car….how on earth would this have been possible with all the worlds media camped outside 24/7??

Viewing 10 posts - 91 through 100 (of 276 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!