Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › mad mullahs wage jihad on teddybear lover
-
AuthorPosts
-
27 November, 2007 at 6:20 pm #8589
ha ha ha like the headline ?
a british teacher in her 50s has been arrested for allegedly committing blasphemy, by allowing her pre school class to call their class teddybear mohammed. the woman was taken into custody in handcuffs, and has been told she faces either a lengthy sentence or 40 lashes for allowing such herracy. government advisors are talking to religious leaders and government officials to try and secure the womans release without punishment.
have these crazy muslim nutters completeley lost the plot or what ?
what next lash all the chldren for suggesting it ?
kill the headmaster for allowing it ? bomb a market for revenge on the honour of allahs prophet ?
lets have a street rage night with plackards and burning flags to punish the infidel west who blaspheme the prophet.?
behead every woman teacher they are whores of the devil. ?
the fekkin lot of em areBARKIN FEKKIN MAD…[PBUH] MY ASS
28 November, 2007 at 12:21 am #293969this story is stupid absolutely stupid
you could argue that she should of known better but…still
by the way what is a mullah?
29 November, 2007 at 10:46 am #293970mullahs are further up the feed chain from imams they rank alongside {roughly] bishops in the christian church they incte the imams and the imams spread the hate amongs the plebs that are followers a bit like the local vicar spreading the word.
now this woman has been formally charged with insulting islam and spreading religious hate she will almost certainly recieve whatever stone age punishment the mad men decide she has deserved. if she recieves fourty lashes it could well kill the poor woman as she is in her 50s and obviously an assault like that would qiute possibly kill her by shock.
sharia law the law used to charge this woman has already spread to england. in dewsbury in wst yorkshire there are two sharia courts used mainly for marital and small money arguments the only difference is that the imams order the guily [almost always women] back to pakistan or the emirates to reieve their sentences. a divorce in islam will almost always end in the death sentence of the wife a sheis no longer owned by her husband and therefore is of no further use to the community.30 November, 2007 at 11:41 am #293971@token_male wrote:
this story is stupid absolutely stupid
you could argue that she should of known better but…still
by the way what is a mullah?
This argument raged on into the early hours of this morning TM. It was a very rare night when I was up late and in the Lobby.
The discussion got to religion and as we all know, it’s an emotive subject. One guy anyway, claiming to be a muslim was trying to ‘educate’ us all on the correctness of the situation and how it had been handled. When asked, he said that the sentence was very lenient and she was very lucky, it could in his words,,,,,,”have been so much worse”.
He then went on to say that the Muslim faith was all seeing, dancing, knowing it all and the best there will ever be, not to mention forgiving!!! Several pple asked then, including me, if your faith is so forgiving, why did this matter ever come to court, why wasn’t it seen for what it was. A slip up? a mistake? on who’s part though, the teacher or the children, we asked also, if the teacher is to be punished, why not the children then, theyr’e the ones originally named the stupid bear :roll: He merely continued to rant how it could have been much worse, she should have made herself aware of things such as this, it was a slur to the prophet etc etc etc, but never once, did he answer the question that was asked in the first place,,,the one regarding forgiveness :lol: :lol: :lol: He did in fact just dissapear, shame some of the other double standard thinking countrymen of his, don’t do the same :roll:
30 November, 2007 at 1:58 pm #293972well…..his religion isnt a country is it? it was the country that had her on trial yes?
i was in the room last night and saw it all and il be honest the amount of racism shown by alot of jc reg users was actually a bit upsetting
he himself actually admitted that the extremists are a minority and they have no respect for them etc he hated it all as much as anyone else but i think he got the brunt of it all because he was a muslim, people where blaming him for every terrorist attack everything!!
even having a go at him about a teahcer who wore a veil! like he had something to do with it
30 November, 2007 at 2:17 pm #293973no its not the country its the countries mad muslim leaders. they will only be happy when somalia is a taliban state as is intended. that is why millions of them are being starved to death and raped and beaten, because they will not bow to islam.and worse than that there are several different islamic groups all fighting for power, so even if the poor sods accept islam they will likeley be slaughtered because they pick the wrong type of islam.
30 November, 2007 at 2:52 pm #293974@token_male wrote:
well…..his religion isnt a country is it? it was the country that had her on trial yes?
Yes his religion but he was representing that country
i was in the room last night and saw it all and il be honest the amount of racism shown by alot of jc reg users was actually a bit upsetting
Racism is a perception in a lot of cases, I was accused by him of being racist, I wasn’t, more his perception, or in laymans terms, the way he preferred to see it cos then he could play the victim
he himself actually admitted that the extremists are a minority and they have no respect for them etc he hated it all as much as anyone else but i think he got the brunt of it all because he was a muslim, people where blaming him for every terrorist attack everything!!
People were not blaming him for every terrorist attack, they were asking his opinions on it and yes I agree, he did say it was a minority. Personally tho, I asked him (and if you were there you already know), that if he knew of a faction in his own temple, would he report it,,,,,he didn’t answer it did he.
even having a go at him about a teahcer who wore a veil! like he had something to do with it
Lastly,,,,,I did not, as you put it, ”have a go” at him about that incident. I did point it out as yet another way that some of them want to change the goalposts when it suits them, I didn’t say it was his fault however.
If your going to post about what happened in the room last nite TM, I suggest you get your facts straight first,,,,,there were others of us there too
30 November, 2007 at 3:00 pm #293975@cas wrote:
@token_male wrote:
well…..his religion isnt a country is it? it was the country that had her on trial yes?
Yes his religion but he was representing that country
i was in the room last night and saw it all and il be honest the amount of racism shown by alot of jc reg users was actually a bit upsetting
Racism is a perception in a lot of cases, I was accused by him of being racist, I wasn’t, more his perception, or in laymans terms, the way he preferred to see it cos then he could play the victim
he himself actually admitted that the extremists are a minority and they have no respect for them etc he hated it all as much as anyone else but i think he got the brunt of it all because he was a muslim, people where blaming him for every terrorist attack everything!!
People were not blaming him for every terrorist attack, they were asking his opinions on it and yes I agree, he did say it was a minority. Personally tho, I asked him (and if you were there you already know), that if he knew of a faction in his own temple, would he report it,,,,,he didn’t answer it did he.
even having a go at him about a teahcer who wore a veil! like he had something to do with it
Lastly,,,,,I did not, as you put it, ”have a go” at him about that incident. I did point it out as yet another way that some of them want to change the goalposts when it suits them, I didn’t say it was his fault however.
If your going to post about what happened in the room last nite TM, I suggest you get your facts straight first,,,,,there were others of us there too
he was british! so he wasnt representing a country at all! thats like saying a catholic represents rome!
if you want to dress it up however you want then thats fine but i do remember it all being about opinion, no one is wrong remember
30 November, 2007 at 3:03 pm #293976@token_male wrote:
@cas wrote:
@token_male wrote:
well…..his religion isnt a country is it? it was the country that had her on trial yes?
Yes his religion but he was representing that country
i was in the room last night and saw it all and il be honest the amount of racism shown by alot of jc reg users was actually a bit upsetting
Racism is a perception in a lot of cases, I was accused by him of being racist, I wasn’t, more his perception, or in laymans terms, the way he preferred to see it cos then he could play the victim
he himself actually admitted that the extremists are a minority and they have no respect for them etc he hated it all as much as anyone else but i think he got the brunt of it all because he was a muslim, people where blaming him for every terrorist attack everything!!
People were not blaming him for every terrorist attack, they were asking his opinions on it and yes I agree, he did say it was a minority. Personally tho, I asked him (and if you were there you already know), that if he knew of a faction in his own temple, would he report it,,,,,he didn’t answer it did he.
even having a go at him about a teahcer who wore a veil! like he had something to do with it
Lastly,,,,,I did not, as you put it, ”have a go” at him about that incident. I did point it out as yet another way that some of them want to change the goalposts when it suits them, I didn’t say it was his fault however.
If your going to post about what happened in the room last nite TM, I suggest you get your facts straight first,,,,,there were others of us there too
he was british! so he wasnt representing a country at all! thats like saying a catholic represents rome!
if you want to dress it up however you want then thats fine but i do remember it all being about opinion, no one is wrong remember
Ok, have it your way.
I’m not however, dressing up anything, it wasn’t racist,,,he chose to call it racist before he left, because it suits him :twisted:
1 December, 2007 at 11:40 am #293977At my sons school they use a bear which they take home, they have to write of the adventures tthey have… it’s called Buckley Bear! It is common practice in primary schools as I am lead to believe. This is just out of order and just another way to show their hatred of anything not muslim. She’ll be deported in a week or so and I say, good riddens, let the fuckers stay as they are, people like that don’t deserve our time!
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!