Boards Index Chat rooms – the forum communities Chat forum three boards Lets hope this scumbag rots inside his cell. 15 years is nothing!

Viewing 10 posts - 41 through 50 (of 94 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1048424

    You can be sure as eggs is eggs the wonderful NHS do NOT EVER Pay out any compo, let alone Millions unless it is absolutely  irrefutable !!!!

    They have the best lawyers, and the investigations go on to the ‘unth’ degree.

    They simply could not afford not to !!!

    Just saying……  B-)

     

     

    #1048432

    I hope the disgusting piece of shit gets life!

    He got 15 years !!!

    Lets hope he’s not too popular in whatever prison he’s in.

    #1048437

     He carried out unnecessary operations in his “private” practice FOR THE MONEY and the procedures he should have done in the NHS where there is NO MONEY, he didn’t perform. HE DIDN’T DO THEM.

    Would like to see the proof, do you have it, besides the various media coverage that seems to change depending on what paper one reads?
    Reason for which I said, I’d have liked to have been  part of the jury …or even better his defence.
    #1048461

    12 good men and women sat through evidence for weeks and decided he was guilty ( without even hearing about the disgusting way he ignored his non private patients )  they heard the evidence ! they judged him !  who the fcuk  gives a flying fcuk what you think ?  you aren’t trained either in criminal law or in a medical way ‘ cough’, stop just trying to be controversial, it doesn’t wash, you just look stupid, trust me on this  !!

    #1048469

    If you read the article (not sure if it was in The Independant or another online paper ) you’ll find it also says that the type of cancer that re-occured in one of the claimants(liver) cannot be proven to have occured as a consequence of the breast cancer.

    Blossom hundreds of people were involved. The NHS paid out 10 million in compensation.

    I’ve decided to give you a longer answer to this.

     

    From The Independant:

    The Scottish-born surgeon was suspended by the General Medical Council in 2012 amid claims he carried out cleavage-sparing mastectomies (CSMs), which led to the recall of more than 700 patients.

    A Freedom of Information request revealed that 68 women who underwent a CSM – in which part of the breast tissue is not removed, and can increase the risk of the disease returning – by Paterson on the NHS had gone on to develop a recurrence of breast cancer.

    I now ask you :

    Why did only 68 out of these 700 develop a re-occurance  of breast cancer?

    Is it because he left too much tissue or is it becasue our DNA is unique and each of us react differently to cancer?

    Gerry wrote:

    He carried out unnecessary operations in his “private” practice FOR THE MONEY

    No Gerry, I think he carried them out as he could choose to do what was the best thing to do for the patients , whereas, as you claim below

    Gerry wrote:

    the procedures he should have done in the NHS where there is NO MONEY, he didn’t perform. HE DIDN’T DO THEM.

    – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – – – – –

    Ever considered that he didn’t perform the right surgeries under  the NHS because  he wasn’t allowed to, as there is a lack of money ?

    Of course they’re compensating the patients, they can’t refuse to do so,  the surgeries took place under their premises under possibly THEIR RULES  and he was perhaps only operating under these RULES.

     

    I have personal experience of both – I know how they  work, Gerry.

     

     

     

    #1048471

    12 good men and women sat through evidence for weeks and decided he was guilty ( without even hearing about the disgusting way he ignored his non private patients ) they heard the evidence ! they judged him ! who the fcuk gives a flying fcuk what you think ? you aren’t trained either in criminal law or in a medical way ‘ cough’, stop just trying to be controversial, it doesn’t wash, you just look stupid, trust me on this !!

    Well moosey, If  Milkman of Human Kindness  is anything to go by (member of this site), as he claims to have done  Jury service,  I’m not surprised at  the outcome of the trial.

    #1048474

    who the fcuk gives a flying fcuk what you think ?

    It’s a message board dear, people post threads in order for other members  to add input.

    Oh,  and stop swearing   – it doesn’t make you look clever…far from it.

    #1048482

    To be fair he wasn`t swearing darling. Now fuckoff b4 you and your cronies carry on cut & pasting bias sources.

    QC John.

    #1048490

    Thanks. And I’m not a He  B-)

    #1048504

    Oh well!! I`m not a QC

    Reading this lot again, I got sunburn so UV rays can fuck right off.

    These people who were admitted there had a higher than average risk of cancer ( hence they were referred yes/no  dumb makeup shovel girl?)  anyways… I think he came in as DrNo back in 2013 before the rooms got Windows 2000`d.

     

     

     

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 5 months ago by  turbo39london.
Viewing 10 posts - 41 through 50 (of 94 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!