-
Posts
-
@slayer wrote:
it does not say whites need not apply.
Correct, whats your point?
There will be numerous schemes for people with disabilities etc but none of those schemes deny the right of anyone to apply or be accepted
And schemes based on nationality and colour?
LHA is an exceptionally respected organisation thats works for the whole community
Except for nominations excluding those who arnt afro caribbeans, that include asians and chinese people.
Slayer, if you could see the LHA paper infront of me, and saw what i described it as saying, what would you think of LHA then?
Emma, what you’ve been saying is libellous and you just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself.
“A defamatory statement constitutes a “libel” if it is:
1)published: (publication, for these purposes, is simply the communication of the defamatory matter to a third person)
2) AND it is in writing, printing or some other permanent form”
So apologize Emma and beg for forgiveness for your wicked ways. Just tell them you’re a congenital idiot (it would be easily believed).
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Emma, what you’ve been saying is libellous and you just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself.
“A defamatory statement constitutes a “libel” if it is:
1)published: (publication, for these purposes, is simply the communication of the defamatory matter to a third person)
2) AND it is in writing, printing or some other permanent form”
So apologize Emma and beg for forgiveness for your wicked ways. Just tell them you’re a congenital idiot (it would be easily believed).
This is an open Forum – although Emma does spout some shyte – she is consistent in her views – there’s loads of defaming on places like this Bigstuff – no doubt a few of the ladies who you have defamed can bring actions of libel against your good self
ffs man grow up – the bloody liberal wishy washy human rights lawyers etc make enough money without you pandering to them
@emmalush wrote:
@Mrs Clean wrote:
Emma, sometimes you have to look on the on light side of life (whistles!)
You tried to imply that i want what you said, then you made out it was a joke, so why the ” :roll: “?
FOR the LOVE OF GOD Emma, my father was an immigrant to this country in 1940’s he came from Jamaica, Im hardly likely to be serious am I? Surely even YOU have a sense of humour, or are you a robot? Im beginning to wonder actually.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Emma, what you’ve been saying is libellous and you just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself.
“A defamatory statement constitutes a “libel” if it is:
1)published: (publication, for these purposes, is simply the communication of the defamatory matter to a third person)
2) AND it is in writing, printing or some other permanent form”
So apologize Emma and beg for forgiveness for your wicked ways. Just tell them you’re a congenital idiot (it would be easily believed).
Er…. just a wee little point. In order to be a ”libel” the statement made HAS to be untrue (whether the person knew this to be the case or not).
It is up to Emma (who made the statement) to demonstrate that it is a true and factual representation of the policies and views of the Leicester Housing Association (”LHA”). If she cannot do this then she must withdraw the statement and offer her apology and undertake NOT to publish or repeat the untrue statement.
For the record JustChat utterly disassociates itself from ANY statement that may constitute a libel whether trade or otherwise. Any views expressed on this site are strictly the views of the individual user and do not represent the views of JustChat or its Staff.
I’m just trying to make a point. Emma makes a habit of making outrageous and offensive comments on here (for a laugh I imagine), so I’m just trying to get her rattled. I’ve seen nothing on the LHA site that suggests that they believe in segregation. What they do say is
“Recognising that investment in people is at least as important as investment in buildings, its core values are:
….Equality of opportunity…..”
So while I am playing mind games with Emma, it’s still true that if someone connected to LHA were ever to see this thread then Emma would be up the creek without a paddle. What she said about them was blatantly false and defamatory.
@drivel wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Emma, what you’ve been saying is libellous and you just keep digging a bigger hole for yourself.
“A defamatory statement constitutes a “libel” if it is:
1)published: (publication, for these purposes, is simply the communication of the defamatory matter to a third person)
2) AND it is in writing, printing or some other permanent form”
So apologize Emma and beg for forgiveness for your wicked ways. Just tell them you’re a congenital idiot (it would be easily believed).
This is an open Forum – although Emma does spout some shyte – she is consistent in her views – there’s loads of defaming on places like this Bigstuff – no doubt a few of the ladies who you have defamed can bring actions of libel against your good self
ffs man grow up – the bloody liberal wishy washy human rights lawyers etc make enough money without you pandering to them
Firstly, I haven’t defamed any women here and secondly this has nothing to do with human rights. I’ve never understood people who hate human rights. Maybe they need to spend some time in China or Saudi Arabia.
How do you explain the link mr bigstuff? The LHA are offering this property. If there policy is not a bad one (and i hope it aint), then why say its only for afro caribbeans?
@Lambrini Girl wrote:
Emma … I have just looked at your link … It says nothing about being ONLY for one or another category of people.
Then what does “Scheme for Afro-Caribean people” mean, if its for all people?
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!