Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › John Terry
-
AuthorPosts
-
14 July, 2012 at 12:37 am #502027
I did say I wasn’t going to post on this thread again but as I am doing so I am obviously lying.
Now seeing as John Terry has been found Not Guilty by A Magistrates Court and not by a Jury made up of his fellow peers, I feel empowered.
Ok so as I’m half black and half white, then I’m totally justified in saying, “f u c k off you f u c k i n g black c u n t s.”
And also:
“F u c k off you f u c k i n g corn beef c u n t s! Call yourself white? You’re f u c k i ng corn beef! And you go to your fake tan sessions because you don’t want to look like corn beef!”
14 July, 2012 at 1:06 am #502028@panda12 wrote:
I did say I wasn’t going to post on this thread again but as I am doing so I am obviously lying.
Now seeing as John Terry has been found Not Guilty by A Magistrates Court and not by a Jury made up of his fellow peers, I feel empowered.
Ok so as I’m half black and half white, then I’m totally justified in saying, “f u c k off you f u c k i n g black c u n t s.”
And also:
“F u c k off you f u c k i n g corn beef c u n t s! Call yourself white? You’re f u c k i ng corn beef! And you go to your fake tan sessions because you don’t want to look like corn beef!”
I am sorry Panda but I don’t see the reasoning behind your posting. All I see is nasty swear words and language I personally would never use anywhere.
14 July, 2012 at 7:10 am #502029Corned beef :lol: …. I bet Martin or whoever had such fun thinking of replacement words in the censorship thing here…. made me laugh anyway :D
14 July, 2012 at 8:16 am #502030so what’s corned beef when teh JC censors haven’t got their hands on it?
14 July, 2012 at 8:27 am #502031@mrs_teapot wrote:
Corned beef :lol: …. I bet Martin or whoever had such fun thinking of replacement words in the censorship thing here…. made me laugh anyway :D
Me too :lol:
14 July, 2012 at 9:45 am #502032Terry and Ferdinand are both a disgrace. The kind of language they used proves it.
14 July, 2012 at 10:01 am #502033Sorry Panda ..but your last post was …well… appalling!
It reminded me of those women who were filmed swearing and ranting racist abuse on the tube some time ago. Both I believe were jailed for their racist rants.
:shock:
14 July, 2012 at 10:48 am #502034@panda12 wrote:
I did say I wasn’t going to post on this thread again but as I am doing so I am obviously lying.
Now seeing as John Terry has been found Not Guilty by A Magistrates Court and not by a Jury made up of his fellow peers, I feel empowered.
Ok so as I’m half black and half white, then I’m totally justified in saying, “f u c k off you f u c k i n g black c u n t s.”
And also:
“F u c k off you f u c k i n g corn beef c u n t s! Call yourself white? You’re f u c k i ng corn beef! And you go to your fake tan sessions because you don’t want to look like corn beef!”
Panda is trying to make a point……and I get it!
The fact that some of you don’t get it is exactly proving her point :roll:14 July, 2012 at 1:12 pm #502035A magistrate should only judge based on what the law allows with the evidence. Although not necessarily legally qualified, magistrates get advice from (I think) the clerk of court.
Magistrates courts only judge individual cases and do not set legal precedents, so this judgement, although it remains as a reference, does not bind any subsequent magistrate to make the same decision under similar circumstances.
So Panda, I saw the point you were making, but in respect of this particular decision Terry’s language is not necessarily OK, he’s basically got away with it.
It is interesting that the focus was on John Terry’s intention rather than on his actions, as I always understood that in law intention could be used in mitigation, but not in judging innocence or guilt. I guess the law in question must specifically mention intent. That does require a certain amount of mind-reading on the part of the magistrate, however, and what I’ve read of this judgement so far doesn’t make total sense to me.
Oh well, back to world peace . . . . . . .
15 July, 2012 at 8:08 pm #502036Because of my lack of interest in football, I didn’t pay enough attention to this case.
I only just read today that Ferdinand actually had nothing to do with the complaint to the police or the charges being pressed against John Terry. Which would make the various comments here and elsewhere about him playing the race card and about him being scum for doing so a tad unjust.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!