Jo Cox 1974-2016 RIP

and that he had KKK books; and that he had a gun; and that he looked at videos showing men firing off a sawed-off  similar to his own, and that he was shouting political slogans and called himself Death to Traitors ‘ etc. etc etc.

But the fact that Mair walked 2 miles to kill Jo Cox (I walk at least that every day to visit friends), and that he was 52 so couldn’t be a political extrremist (????) is truly a product of a bizarre mind.

This is conspiracy theory gone off the wall.

There are conspiracies – the secret services do occasionally kill people.

In David kelly’s case, there are reasons  why he would be killed, and the case is suspicious.

But if you’re going to convince me that youa re at all serious in your outlook on life, I’d like to know why they would want to pin the murder of Jo Cox on this guy? Who benefits???Brexiteers weren’t hurt – theyw ere almost unanimous in their condemnation. The British Nazis  weren’t even hurt, as theyw ere absolved of any plot or connection to mair.

mair wasn an internet Nazi and an internet white supremacist and a genuine killer.

If you disagree, then don’t give the strangest items of evidence about clothing and age, but show me (and I’m not sure I’m sane for listening) why they would want to go to such lengths??

I’m not angry, SHR.

Incredulous, yes, but not angry.

I’m still totally stumped as to why you think a conspiracy is involved here. You still haven’t answered the basic question of cui bono, which would then give us grounds for at least suspicion.

The only reason that there are unanswered questions about this case is that Mair was silent throughout four hours of police interviews, and refused to offer evidence during the trial, merely giving his name as “Death to traitors, freedom for Britain”. He wanted to make a statement (presumably political) once the verdict was given, but the judge told him that his refusal to offer evidence meant that he had relinquished his right to speak.

But the evidence was pretty heavy. Apart from the eyewitnesses – Jo Cox was killed in the open in front of people (two of her assistants attacked Mair with their handbags, while another man tried to stop Mair only to be stabbed in the abdomen.

Mair first expressed his beliefs in a letter to a pro-apartheid South African magazine called SA Patriot in 1988, saying, “I still have hope that the White Race will prevail, both in Britain and South Africa, but I fear it’s going to be a very long and very bloody struggle”.

In 1999 in another letter to the same magazine Mair said “the greatest enemy of the old Apartheid system was not the ANC and the black masses but the white liberals and traitors”.

He contributed to the US neo-nazi National Vanguard Books, founded by a man (William Pierce) who believed that there should be a mass execution of the white tliberals who betrayed their race.

Mair printed out a column by Jo Cox supporting refugees and calling for the UK to remain within the EU, and  kept it in a ring-binder together with a column on Anders Breivik, the neo-nazi Norwegian who killed 77 Young Socialists in 2011. Mair owned the sawn-off rifle whihc was used to shoot Jo Cox in the head, before he dragged her by the hair across the street and stabbed her time after time (he had asked Google “Is a .22 round deadly enough to kill with one shot to the human head?”)

So you can see why I’m incredulous, and why the jury found mair guilty by a unanimous verdict after a brief deliberation.

But if you can give more evidence (other than the fact that the guy was old and wearing casual clothes and walked 2 miles, as I do that every day), then I am still waiting.

So – who benefits to the extent that they will either kill Jo Cox, or that a poor innocent neo-nazi with racist views and a liking for violent plots, who seems to get quite depressed, was framed???

I’m not angry, just incredulous and waiting for the simple answer to the above question. Why don’t you give it?