Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › Jimmy Saville
-
AuthorPosts
-
6 October, 2012 at 11:32 am #511926
Not that much has changed. Paedophile rings still operate, individual paedophiles still prey on children. They work their way into positions where they have access to children, can escape detection and can intimidate their victims. They can be found hiding in plain sight as parents, carers, workers in education, the police, in highly respected professions, in low profile or voluntary roles and yes, celebrities.
People collude, cover up or don’t speak up either because of involvement, because their personal morals don’t exclude or criminalise the actions involved, because of fear of guilt by association or because they don’t think they themselves would be believed, they don’t know how it could be proved or because they don’t know how they can answer the question “why didn’t you come forward sooner?”.
Despite the hostility expressed towards ‘pervs’ of all kinds, even in JC there are people who feel brave enough to use highly dubious names, talk of their actions/inclinations towards children or ask other chatters in pm about the children they come into contact with through family or work. I hope the people concerned are reported, but the lack of faith often expressed in JC’s reporting system makes me think not.
Without paranoia or hysteria, we can act on the things we encounter that do worry us. Perhaps if more people did that about Savile and his ilk, things would have been dealt with justly and in time.
6 October, 2012 at 11:39 am #511927The only issue about him being dead is that justice cannot be done if it is one sided. In that sense any attempt to “punish” anyone is difficult, including people who “should” have known. It is clear that lots of people thought he was creepy and did nothing.
It is however important that people have the chance to understand what happened to them and get whatever support or solace that they can.
As for the rest of us who weren’t involved in it, as other people have suggested, we need to understand as a society what is acceptable and unacceptable so that we do not repeat it.
According to what we know, Jimmy Saville got away with taking advantage of vulnerable girls as a result of being a show business star. He certainly was not the only one and I imagine that other DJs/rock stars/actors/comedians etc. also did things which were wrong, which may or may not ever come out.
There are numerous “casting couch” stories out there which are all pretty unsavoury. Let’s just hope that what was acceptable a couple of decades ago is unacceptable now. And let’s hope that people would have more courage now to come forward now.
We can’t really try Jimmy Saville in his absence now he is dead. In some ways he is an easy target, but then he did not live his life as a saint and his reputation will always a mixed one because of that.
Equally we can’t blame women for not coming forward during Jimmy Saville’s lifetime. Whatever the details of what happened to them or however consensual, they are struggling to come to terms with difficult things and should have our sympathy and support.
6 October, 2012 at 11:40 am #511928@jen_jen wrote:
Poli at times your naivety astounds me…at least I hope it is naivety.
My thoughts exactly.
6 October, 2012 at 4:14 pm #511929@jen_jen wrote:
So abuse victims who didn’t come forward years ago should now keep quiet if their abusers are dead or “too old to be a threat”? When is a man too old to be a threat?
And if you don’t think it would be brushed under the carpet now if someone was influential enough…well there isn’t anything more to be said is there?
Tell me…your child comes to you as an adult and breaks down, they tell you that they were abused as a child 20 years ago but were too afraid to say anything at the time and it still haunts them. Their abuser is now in their 70s or dead. What are you going to say to your child?
Well sorry love, you should have said something at the time, it’s too late now that he’s dead/too old to be a threat to anyone else so lets just forget about it and move on shall we? Nothing to be gained from going back to it, waste of time and energy…
In all probability , yes jen i would. maybe suggest counselling for them if they felt they needed it, but whats the point in trying to do anything else if the person is dead, use your time and energy to help and support them of course but no point going after someone who is no longer alive or a threat, so yes i think thats exactly what i would say and do. If that makes me wrong or naive them so be it, but thats how i think i would feel if that happened to mine too yes. Of course i’d be angry at the person but i wouldn’t dwell on it as it would do nothing other than open old scars for them and prolong something thats best forgotten, even if help is required to face and deal with it, and i am 100% certain i would not drag it through the media for anyone to feed on, whoever it was.
But If it happened now and they came to me i would fight my last breath to ensure that person was convicted for what they did and to stop them doing it to anyone else.6 October, 2012 at 4:26 pm #511930I am speechless.
6 October, 2012 at 4:28 pm #511931Do you really think that a victim of abuse can just pick themselves up, dust themselves down and move on, forget it? Really? Because if you do, naive is not the word.
6 October, 2012 at 4:33 pm #511932Pol…someone you’ve known for 30 years – your best friend – is lying in hospital after being knocked over by a HGV.
You’re there with them trying to comfort them in their hour of need. The doctor has told you your best friend has ten minutes left to live but you know the shop is closing in 10 minutes and you really fancy a packet of crisps.
There’s nothing more you can do for your friend and you ARE really hungry…..
6 October, 2012 at 4:34 pm #511933Your last two posts, Jen, I couldn’t agree with you more.
Well said. =D> =D> =D>
6 October, 2012 at 4:38 pm #511934@panda12 wrote:
Your last two posts, Jen, I couldn’t agree with you more.
Well said. =D> =D> =D>
I agree with Jen too. And I’m sure, if he was alive, Jimmy Savile would be agreeing with poli
6 October, 2012 at 4:40 pm #511935I do know what you mean poli it seems a fruitless exercise when the person is dead…. However, especially in the case of Jimmy if what has been said is true it needs to be told. People need to know he was not the icon they thought him to be……. Im only sorry he is not alive to answer the charges because the awful thing is we will never know how he would have dealt with it and his explanation.
Im sure some women will jump on the bandwagon and enjoy the limelight… but it pains me to say it… there are too many women to discount and having watched the TV documentary there does seem to be some substance to some of the recollections of these women. So doubtless things will unfold.. so sad things have ended like this for him… but if he did these things he only has himself to blame…. time will tell.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!