-
Posts
-
@minim wrote:
Smiley…… you of all people should know better. I seem to remember your entrapment disguises in JC. You would deliberately try and trap paedophiles in Forum 1. Now then…. I suspect you are being deliberately inflammatory, but enough is enough.
Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile. He will always be a convicted paedophile. Anyone who allows him access to their children in the future on the premise that he was “set up” has to be missing a large amount of brain cells and common sense.
controversy for attention sake is as bad as the real Mcoy !
Concerning another well-known former pop star who was jailed for committing crimes against children and still protests his innocence – back in the 70’s, there were ‘hearsay’ stories doing the rounds at school about the sort of things he got up to that were consistent with the crimes he was later jailed for. Sort of like…..’My friend’s brother was at a party and they went upstairs and in the bedroom they found……..’ kind of thing.
Someone else drew the parallel with Leslie Grantham, a convicted murderer, and how he was hired by the BBC as a bad guy. Nobody who has committed a serious violent or sexual crime should ever have any place in public life.
@minim wrote:
Smiley…… you of all people should know better. I seem to remember your entrapment disguises in JC. You would deliberately try and trap paedophiles in Forum 1. Now then…. I suspect you are being deliberately inflammatory, but enough is enough.
Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile. He will always be a convicted paedophile. Anyone who allows him access to their children in the future on the premise that he was “set up” has to be missing a large amount of brain cells and common sense.
But he’s innocent. He was deliberately framed.
Those people in F1 were clearly guilty! I saw they were guilty with my own eyes.
I’ve never seen Glitter bumming a child, thus, innocent.
May I just say.. that.. if I had kids.. I would NOT allow Glitter to babysit them, no.
Because there’s so much controversy flying around, there’s always that doubt in the back of your mind.
BUT, I’m only looking at facts here.
Where was his pictures found? PC World. That’s contaminated evidence right there. DOWNLOADED pictures were found in a… COMPUTER shop. Hmmm?? They couldn’t have been planted, could they? ;) course they could.
Second evidence.. a picture of him hugging a 10 year old in Vietnam. The picture was taken by a member of.. THE BRITISH PRESS. Yet again, contaminated evidence. It could easily have been a setup, another money-making opportunity for the press.
I only deal with facts, and the fact is, there is NO hard evidence that Glitter is guilty. No, I wouldn’t trust him with my kids, but yes, I’m a fan of his, the majority of my conscience beliees he’s innocent and I would gladly buy him a pint.
Even if his personal behaviour had always been cleaner than clean, I fail to see why anyone would ever have become a fan of Gary Glitter!!
@bassingbourne55 wrote:
Even if his personal behaviour had always been cleaner than clean, I fail to see why anyone would ever have become a fan of Gary Glitter!!
you mean you never wanted to be in his gang??? :shock:
sorry lol someone was gonna say it…….
@cath 55 wrote:
@bassingbourne55 wrote:
Even if his personal behaviour had always been cleaner than clean, I fail to see why anyone would ever have become a fan of Gary Glitter!!
you mean you never wanted to be in his gang??? :shock:
sorry lol someone was gonna say it…….
Oh Yeahhh! :wink:
@smiley wrote:
May I just say.. that.. if I had kids.. I would NOT allow Glitter to babysit them, no.
Because there’s so much controversy flying around, there’s always that doubt in the back of your mind.
BUT, I’m only looking at facts here.
Where was his pictures found? PC World. That’s contaminated evidence right there. DOWNLOADED pictures were found in a… COMPUTER shop. Hmmm?? They couldn’t have been planted, could they? ;) course they could. you’re emmalush aint you
Second evidence.. a picture of him hugging a 10 year old in Vietnam. The picture was taken by a member of.. THE BRITISH PRESS. Yet again, contaminated evidence. It could easily have been a setup, another money-making opportunity for the press. Here you are little girl heres a packet of sweeties go and force that nice man to hug you
I only deal with facts, and the fact is, there is NO hard evidence that Glitter is guilty. No, I wouldn’t trust him with my kids, but yes, I’m a fan of his, the majority of my conscience beliees he’s innocent and I would gladly buy him a pint. but would you drop ya pants and bend down in front of him (dont answer that btw)
@pete wrote:
@smiley wrote:
May I just say.. that.. if I had kids.. I would NOT allow Glitter to babysit them, no.
Because there’s so much controversy flying around, there’s always that doubt in the back of your mind.
BUT, I’m only looking at facts here.
Where was his pictures found? PC World. That’s contaminated evidence right there. DOWNLOADED pictures were found in a… COMPUTER shop. Hmmm?? They couldn’t have been planted, could they? ;) course they could. you’re emmalush aint you
Second evidence.. a picture of him hugging a 10 year old in Vietnam. The picture was taken by a member of.. THE BRITISH PRESS. Yet again, contaminated evidence. It could easily have been a setup, another money-making opportunity for the press. Here you are little girl heres a packet of sweeties go and force that nice man to hug you
I only deal with facts, and the fact is, there is NO hard evidence that Glitter is guilty. No, I wouldn’t trust him with my kids, but yes, I’m a fan of his, the majority of my conscience beliees he’s innocent and I would gladly buy him a pint. but would you drop ya pants and bend down in front of him (dont answer that btw)
Yes, Emmalush is one of my many personas on these forums, and yes, I’ve always been a huge fan of Gary Glitter. He is (or was, before his recent breakdown due to wrongful persecution :() a naturally funny man. A brilliant entertainer, he loved being loved – hence why he’s obviously innocent. Watch him on camera, on his TV interviews, his charisma shines, he feeds off the love of the audience, he wouldn’t have done anything to jeapordize that.
Gary Glitter was just Britain’s most glamarous Rock’n’Roll star who, unfortunately, became a target of the tabloid press who wanted to make a lot of money from him, hence his framing :(
As for your last question, well, I’m gay, so yes, of course I would. Who wouldn’t want to have sex with the world’s most famous and talented Rock & Roll star?
Depends if you class Mariah Carey as rock and roll
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!