Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Its good to be back????
-
AuthorPosts
-
20 August, 2008 at 8:09 pm #364786
@bassingbourne55 wrote:
He deserves to have very close tabs kept on him wherever he goes and comes across as an extremely unpleasant old man even leaving aside the evil things he’s done.
It occurred to me that if he’d chosen a career in a more hard-edged sector of the pop industry, rather than glam-rock poputainment for teenyboppers – say punk, death metal or gansta-rap, Glitter’s notoriety might have been less of a barrier or even boosted his career. After all, Sex Pistols music is still played although one of the group (Sid Vicious) was a murderer.
given the recent and unsavoury American court case involving R Kelly you may well have a point bass. Despite being accused of having sex with an under-age girl (and worse) he even recorded a track about it all.
However, the best Pistols music was made before Sid joined the band, and afterwards when the album was recorded, he was in fact so incapable that the lead guitarist had to play the bass instead.
I remember watching a documentary about Glitter some time ago. A quietly spoken woman appeared who was the best friend of his daughter back in the seventies. She stayed overnight at his palatial Surrey dwelling and described how exciting it was having a sleepover at the mansion of a much loved pop star.
During the night she found this animal on top of her having full intercourse. Not knowing what was really going on, this brave woman explained on national television how she had a shower afterwards and never said anything to anybody until much older. She was eight years old at the time. ………
Yes, evil in two foot high silver boots but how many other victims are out there ?
I agree with Sword, in this case his celebrity status will allow for constant monitoring, whereas most offenders will disappear under the radar.
20 August, 2008 at 8:15 pm #364787Under the sea would be better
20 August, 2008 at 8:19 pm #364788Seal toy?
Dont you mean R Kelly?
I love seal! :shock:
20 August, 2008 at 8:20 pm #36478920 August, 2008 at 8:30 pm #364790sharongooner wrote:a bad mistake to have made Sharon, while feeling angry
many thanks + I have edited
x20 August, 2008 at 8:33 pm #364791not a problem. :wink:
And yes, I totally understand your anger.
People trying to justify and compare stuff…. its really not hip man.
20 August, 2008 at 10:09 pm #364792The Glam Rock Meister aint getting into Hong Kong either. This story’s even better than the Canoe one.
20 August, 2008 at 10:42 pm #364793Smiley…… you of all people should know better. I seem to remember your entrapment disguises in JC. You would deliberately try and trap paedophiles in Forum 1. Now then…. I suspect you are being deliberately inflammatory, but enough is enough.
Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile. He will always be a convicted paedophile. Anyone who allows him access to their children in the future on the premise that he was “set up” has to be missing a large amount of brain cells and common sense.
20 August, 2008 at 11:09 pm #364794Even if Smiley genuinely and honestly thought he was set up and innocent .. i wonder if he would risk allowing his own children to spend time with him just in case !
I say hang him and if we find out later he was set up and infact innocent we can put up a memorial plaque with sorry on it :)
Better safe than sorry20 August, 2008 at 11:10 pm #364795He could meet my kids …. they’d give him a kicking like
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!