Its good to be back????

@obtuse wrote:

the replys
are exactly the reason why sentencing for paedophiles is totally disproportionate to the crime. there isnt a single thing humourous about child abuse.
Me being deliberately inflamatory and taking the pi,ss out of your stereotypical moral indignation somehow justifys your indifference to child abuse.
I have worked and continue to work with more races than the vast majority of people
i endorse multiculturalism.
i just dont like niggers

oh fook off ye borin kunt. 8)

@smiley wrote:

@minim wrote:

Smiley…… you of all people should know better. I seem to remember your entrapment disguises in JC. You would deliberately try and trap paedophiles in Forum 1. Now then…. I suspect you are being deliberately inflammatory, but enough is enough.

Gary Glitter is a convicted paedophile. He will always be a convicted paedophile. Anyone who allows him access to their children in the future on the premise that he was “set up” has to be missing a large amount of brain cells and common sense.

But he’s innocent. He was deliberately framed.

Those people in F1 were clearly guilty! I saw they were guilty with my own eyes.

I’ve never seen Glitter bumming a child, thus, innocent.

Smiles…. he was found guilty of downloading child pron (and sorry if this has already been mentioned but i haven’t got the inclination to read the whole of this thread). He admitted it and said sorry on television, shortly before hopping off to an area of the world where he thought he could carry on with his ways without being stopped. He was wrong.

Lies, all lies. HE’S INNOCENT.