-
Posts
-
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Ok. I’m getting confused over what we are arguing about here.
This thread was produced to talk about good racism.
I’ve just told you what is bad about racism. It’s about the current meaning of the word. Let’s be more plain.
There is no current racism that doesnt include all racism, good or bad.
All welsh people shag sheep
All Scots are tight-fisted and alcoholic
All English are upper-class football hooligans
All Irish are thick
The whole point about the above is that it makes the people who say/believe it feel superior to those who they are saying/believing it about.
THAT’s what the word “racism” means in 2006No, theres more than what you say. Click on the first post links of this thread for confirmation.
Also, in these modern times of liberalised society, those who implement it choose to ignore all racism, and focus on the bad, because they believe that their political enemies support bad racism, therefore makes the lefty liberalised mob “look good”, and thats all they care about.There are good things about liberalisation, but our liberalised political masters take it too far, and thus we get a sesspit society.
The definition that you have found refers mainly to physical characteristics: e.g The indigenous population of Europe is mainly white-skinned. Fact.
Your missing the point. A race of people (as described by the OED), amongst other things, is a group of people with a common feature. They could be a football team, a work force at a bank or a group of stamp collectors. Us posters on this website are a racial group of people, because we share a common feature.
If someone believes in the chracteristics, ability or policy of us, the football team, the dinner ladies or the stamp collectors, then thats racism.
YES, it sounds DAFT, but thats ONLY because weve been taught that racism is only a bad thing. We are all racist, and fascist sometimes.I would be fascinated to know if you are suggesting something else? You seem very keen to make a point but I don’t understand what it is. (Genuinely confused: not being nasty)
I am not suggesting anything other than the facts in which i have presented. In our political and social society climate, its very understandable for the general public to assume that im talking about racism thats bad.
For you to understand what im saying better, ignore bad racism.@drivel wrote:
I don’t agree with much Emma spouts off – I do agree with whoever wrote before about “ism” becoming totally unrealistic
Mr Bigs scenario is almost as silly as he is – he talks about Emma picking and choosing points to back up her arguments – as she does – disregarding all the other points – then he comes up with a 3 people left in the world scenario – get real Biggy !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I was making the point that racism is not natural, instinctive behaviour and is something that is learnt. Clearly the point went over your head, what a pity.
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Please try to understand me rather than just saying no!
If only i had the time.
Your trying to engage in this threads subject. This threads subject is not about you, its about good racism. Learn to understand that, then come back to me.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
I was making the point that racism is not natural, instinctive behaviour and is something that is learnt.
Im willing to believe that, but only if you can prove we dont naturaly believe in the chracteristics, ability or policy of a group of people with a common feature?
I think your scared to admit it. Prove me wrong?
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Who the F*&J do you think you are?
Ok I give up. This thread is obviously about YOU. YOU started the fookin thread, not me. You have never tried to understand anyone else. You are fixated on defining the term “racism” as positive but you won’t reveal your motives. You are a complete assh0le as other people have tried to tell me. I now believe them.
:roll:Its not about me, its not about you, i told you what it was about, but you chose to ignore my words, hmm
I told you my motive, but you chose to ignore that too, can you read?
As for believing others, just shows your fascist ways.
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Go read something you stupid b. Not the fookin SUn or whatever it is that passes for literature in your hovel. It’s you WHO CAN’T PROVE ANYTHING.
I dont read newspapers, well only through the net, and very VERY breifly.
READ the first post in this thread for PROOF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
I was making the point that racism is not natural, instinctive behaviour and is something that is learnt.
Im willing to believe that, but only if you can prove we dont naturaly believe in the chracteristics, ability or policy of a group of people with a common feature?
I think your scared to admit it. Prove me wrong?
You were so obviously wrong that I didn’t think it actually needed to be explained to you. But, since you insist, I’ll spell it out for you. Racial classifications are man-made so obviously believing in racial characteristics, ability, policy, etc. is something that is learnt not something that is instinctive. Therefore you are wrong. There is also no scientific basis to say that different racial groups have different abilities except for a few specific biological exceptions e.g. dark skinned people are naturally protected from the sun while paler-skinned people aren’t.
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Racial classifications are man-made so obviously believing in racial characteristics, ability, policy, etc. is something that is learnt not something that is instinctive. There is also no scientific basis to say that different racial groups have different abilities except for a few specific biological exceptions e.g. dark skinned people are naturally protected from the sun while paler-skinned people aren’t.
Mr, your confusing skin colour with this thread. Forget skin colour for a bit ok. DEAL with what else is also race, “a group of people with a common feature”.
Does a group of people working at a bank, have different abilities to stamp collectors who have NEVER worked at a bank, and dont know what banking is about? Of course, so scientifically, differing racial gropus do have differing ability.
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Racial classifications are man-made so obviously believing in racial characteristics, ability, policy, etc. is something that is learnt not something that is instinctive. There is also no scientific basis to say that different racial groups have different abilities except for a few specific biological exceptions e.g. dark skinned people are naturally protected from the sun while paler-skinned people aren’t.
Mr, your confusing skin colour with this thread. Forget skin colour for a bit ok. DEAL with what else is also race, “a group of people with a common feature”.
Does a group of people working at a bank, have different abilities to stamp collectors who have NEVER worked at a bank, and dont know what banking is about? Of course, so scientifically, differing racial gropus do have differing ability.
I’d like to think you’re typing all this for a joke, otherwise you’d have to be the biggest imbecile I’ve ever come across. Classing someone as a bank-worker doesn’t define their race it defines their profession and whether you are defining someone’s race or profession, these are both artificial concepts. Unless of course you believe that there are a race of people born with the ability to handle mortgages and issue loans.
Look at it this way, an Ethiopian and a South African might be classed as the same race but an Ethiopian wouldn’t look at a South African and think that the other person is one of his own people. Likewise, a portuguese man wouldn’t look at a Finn or an icelandic man and think he belongs to the same group of people as him. What I’m saying is that classifications for race are artificial and so you cannot say that racism is natural because nobody is born with a concept of what race is. You learn what “race” is and therefore you have to learn to be a racist.
@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Whats your make fun of point?
Yes, obviously someone who works at a fking bank knows more about banking that a fkgin road sweeper. What is your fking point?
They are NOT fkging racial groups!
Im almost convinced your a wind up, but i”ll give you the benifit for now.
A race of people, is a group of people with a common feature. Im sure im wasting my time here heheThey are just people who do different jobs. I HAVE READ YOUR DEFINITIONS. AND SEEN YOUR LINKS. WHAT are you trying to say? Right end of stalking. I’m off. Please feel free to post smilies etc, showing your superiority over me. I wouldn’t p on you if you were on fire.
I was right, your are a fascist.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!