Is Gary Glitter Innocent?

@Man in Beds wrote:

@mattuj56 wrote:

shamon, we all know gary gliter fingered the kids or whatever, and paid off their families, why are we even giving this man any time 2 discuss him, he needs to sort himself out, if he finds young people attractive thats what he likes, but to act upon it is what lands a person in jail. anyone can like what they like, young people, fatties, animals, gingers, u just can like it but dont do anythin against the society, if there was no society, gays, make fun of murderers, muggers and all the bad stuff would just be normal, and thats the way humans are naturally, but cuz of society u cant be like it. its not for me 2 say wats right or rong, gary glitter obviously thinks he is right liking the people he likes i cant say hes wrong because if we didnt have society rules it wouldnt be wrong. but if anyone tried 2 touch my kid id break their hands. so im kinda contradictive, but i think people shouldnt be told they are wrong for feeling how they feel, they are just wrong if they do things with people that arent capable of consenting, to it. i just feel its wrong 2 tell people they are wrong for feeling the way they naturally feel and they cant help feeling that way because its natural 2 them.

Are you that perverted SOB by some chance? It appears so as you seem to defend his way of thinking and his desires.
Also,the desire to have any form of sex with children is NOT natural and people like Gary Glitter (perhaps even you) should have their nuts cut off and they than should be made to eat them, raw and straight after the cutting.

I have a feeling that the filth named glitter would more than likely get a kick out of that :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Gary i mean not you

you won even though you didnt answer my questions ??
he has been proven guilty set up or not theres no smoke without fire (twice)

@smiley wrote:

I believe he is, because it is proven fact that the pictures on his hard drive were placed there by a staff member in PC World, so he could cash in on the newspaper story.

There has never been proof of him molesting children, and he has always denied molesting children. Gary Glitter is NOT a liar, so if he says he hasn’t, then he hasn’t.

Gary Glitter IS innocent, and has been WRONGLY persecuted, prosecuted, harassed and oppressed. He’s aged before his time because of all the stress, and it’s wrong. He should be compensated.

When you say it’s “A proven fact” that the pictures were placed on his hard drive, where does that concrete evidence come from?