-
Posts
-
This guy seems a genuine fool, thinking he’s an adult because he can use obscene imagery. Like Norfolk but without the intelligence.
Personally, I wouldn’t bother with an answer.
gerry, to me, the answer to your post is provided by nemesis imho I don’t see divorce as a sin – it’s often an escape from deep unhappiness and even suicide. The most unpleasant set of posts here lately (so far) seems to be provided by an upholder of ‘morality’ against sin – a real Old Testament type, with his denunciation of a woman tryng to resolve her problem as a ‘moo’.
I treat everyone equally judging as I find, I don’t lurk up womens backsides simply because they possess a vagina ignoring behaviour which is at best childish and at worst completely deranged. Rose Went could have an account here and she would receive pms asking if she has a cam informing her shes misunderstood due to testosterone clouding views again from a bunch of sex deprived men.
I used to have a friend who was married, to most he was a decent guy with a spine and fortitude of character… when his “wife” called he adopted this sick whining high pitched voice like a little girl lost looking for its mother. He was more of a dog than a man on a leash and I see similar traits exhibited by many men on here. If a man started a thread with the quite frankly ridiculous self attention seeking drunken rubbish we see from the usual characters, the man would be chastised, blocked and probably banned. What we have though are a bunch of lonely guys, whilst some may be relatively intelligent, pandering to this crap because they driven by hormones like a teenager just exacerbating the situation. At 16 I may have done something similar, but surely you are old enough to control your raging hormones and stop this sickly crawling to anything female online regardless of how they behave. All it does is give the impression you have doormat stamped on your forehead , behave like a man not someone with their tongue lodged so far up any female arse even when clearly mentally ill you are tickling their intestines. It doesn’t carry any favours with them sexually- just makes you look weak and spineless giving them the belief we all want to see more ranting BS.. most don’t so don’t speak for the rest of us on here.
Magmanimous I never mentioned paralysed once, your quoting me from someone else’s post, I was replying to you simply about the vibrator comment, a vibrator does not do the things I mentioned, correct? You just totally twisted that… :)
Sin is falling short of the mark, and we all do that.
You are assuming a lot of things about him, and her. They love each other and he is in no way upset.
Who decides what is “right?” You?
Magmanimous I never mentioned paralysed once, your quoting me from someone else’s post, I was replying to you simply about the vibrator comment, a vibrator does not do the things I mentioned, correct? You just totally twisted that… :)
I agree, but the post was in reference to echos post about the disabled/paralysed guy.. I don’t see how it can’t be classified as cheating regardless of sexual needs. That said, I may do the same as this woman but I wouldn’t pretend it’s anything other than what it is.
Sin is falling short of the mark, and we all do that. You are assuming a lot of things about him, and her. They love each other and he is in no way upset. Who decides what is “right?” You?
Any man would be upset at a woman he loves having sex with someone else.. jesus how naive can you be? Sin doesn’t exist, please stop mentioning it- it’s a figment of your own imagination encouraged by religion.
I’d have more respect for your ” friend ” echo if she was candid about what she was doing instead of hiding behind this fallacy of it being fine. As though in reality any man would be happy with his wife to say,” bbl hun I’m off for some dick”
You can argue the morality of what she is doing but to dress it up as anything other than a woman hurting her husband to satisfy her own sexual appetite is disingenuous. Maybe if a woman can’t have sex after pregnancy and the guy says, “look I need it so will have to pop round the neighbours” that’s equally acceptable, what’s the difference? Your friend is a disgrace – simple as that and I feel sorry for the paralysed guy who must be in mental torment allied to his physical disabilities. The fact you associate with people like that speaks a great deal about who you regard as moral suggesting what your own character is like perhaps?
You’re presuming again.
If sin doesn’t exist, where do your morals come from? (I am genuinely curious)
Sin exists for me, murder, rape, they’re not a sin? Call it wrongdoing if you like, tis sematics.
I agree cheating is wrong, my question was who are we to judge, it all comes down to personal opinion.
You are assuming a lot of things about him, and her. They love each other and he is in no way upset. Who decides what is “right?” You?
No need for religious rubbish and stupid imaginary things like God because we have this creep, withotu self-doubt, calling women moos who just need a vibrator, confidently assumng that all real men talk and act like him.
No need for God, because this creep is a better stand-in, judging people and asuming he knows just what is being said.
Believe it or not, that is an argument I’m making, similar to that of nemesis asking him who is judging what is right.
Sin is falling short of the mark, and we all do that.
That’s not how I see sin. What is the mark? I don’t see marital fidelity as the mark, or divorce, or any particular sin. Who sets ‘the mark’, and where is it set? It’s either very vague or far too precise, if you understand me.
She was against the idea originally, he loves her enough to not deny her, they discussed it at length.
I would rather associate with honest, flawed people than those who sit in judgement.
2 members liked this post.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!