Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › "Idiots" and "Lunatics" to be MP’s
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 July, 2008 at 6:04 am #356108
@forumhostpb wrote:
So it looks as if the nutters in our society can now become MPs if they wish.Nutters voted for our MP’s. Nutters vote for policy which try’s to accomodate different people.
Example.
Say theres 1000 people in a constituency, 100 muslims, 100 christians, 100 Polish, 100 whites, 100 africans etc etc.The funding to benefit these people is £1000 (just hypothetical).
The muslims want a community centre built, but they cost £20,000. The Polish need £10,000 to fund accomodation, and everyone else needs 10k for something or other.
How do you build the community centre for the muslims? You can’t. But alot of them voted for New Labour (likely), so they want to be looked after. But New Labour’s policy is to treat everyone fairly, 10k each. So NL will build one community centre for everyone…
24 July, 2008 at 8:44 am #356109Not for the muslims theres is £20000 and i’m curious why the muslims cost the most i mean the poles only wanted £10000
24 July, 2008 at 9:21 am #356110@forumhostpb wrote:
Government Ministers are considering allowing “idiots” and “lunatics” to stand for Parliament
Have you got your mandate ready?
25 July, 2008 at 5:30 pm #356111@sword wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Government Ministers are considering allowing “idiots” and “lunatics” to stand for Parliament
Have you got your mandate ready?
Maybe you could get another “job” as an IT advisor after election of course.
Let’s face it, what with your internet hardware experience, coupled with your unerring business instinct, your go down a storm eh?
25 July, 2008 at 6:07 pm #356112Well I don’t dodge the taxman Hoseason… that in its own has more danger than acumen. Oh and I don’t work for fools, go find another sucker.
25 July, 2008 at 9:06 pm #356113@pete wrote:
Not for the muslims theres is £20000 and i’m curious why the muslims cost the most i mean the poles only wanted £10000
:lol: its an example. Certain people vote for labour as with every party. Political parties know who they are.
So when labour say they’ll accomodate everyone’s wishes, they don’t because theres not enough money to do so, so they accomodate the one’s they believe voted for them = discrimination.
25 July, 2008 at 9:13 pm #356114@emmalush wrote:
@pete wrote:
Not for the muslims theres is £20000 and i’m curious why the muslims cost the most i mean the poles only wanted £10000
:lol: its an example. Certain people vote for labour as with every party. Political parties know who they are.
So when labour say they’ll accomodate everyone’s wishes, they don’t because theres not enough money to do so, so they accomodate the one’s they believe voted for them = discrimination.
yeah its an example but its a bit freudian as well emma ?
25 July, 2008 at 9:29 pm #356115@pete wrote:
yeah its an example but its a bit freudian as well emma ?
Labour didn’t complain when london transport advertised for ethnic minorities only earlier this year.
They introduced a bill to legalise anti-white racism.
They want to split England into regions.
Do they cater for white English people? no.
They forced yorkshire police to wear islamic armbands twice now in the last year to “appease the muslims”.
They’ve recently disregarded hundreds of signatures against a proposed mosque in birmingham.
They tried very hard to change christmas in “winter festival”.
Muslims are far more likely to vote labour and lib dems than anyone else. Labour are far more likely to consider muslims or ethnic minorities than majority people.
25 July, 2008 at 9:37 pm #356116@emmalush wrote:
@pete wrote:
yeah its an example but its a bit freudian as well emma ?
Labour didn’t complain when london transport advertised for ethnic minorities only earlier this year.
They introduced a bill to legalise anti-white racism.
They want to split England into regions.
Do they cater for white English people? no.
They forced yorkshire police to wear islamic armbands twice now in the last year to “appease the muslims”.
They’ve recently disregarded hundreds of signatures against a proposed mosque in birmingham.
They tried very hard to change christmas in “winter festival”.
Muslims are far more likely to vote labour and lib dems than anyone else. Labour are far more likely to consider muslims or ethnic minorities than majority people.
and you are far more likely to make muslims look the worst far as i can see
According to the 2001 Population Census there were 977,087 people resident in Birmingham. This is now considered to be an underestimate of the population, a revised estimate for Mid 2001 gives the City’s population as 984,600. Hundreds aint a lot when theres that many ppl eh or do the people who dont mind a mosque not count. Its a building for worship same as a church
Cause you’re anti labour doesnt mean you have to be anti muslim or pole or any other creed or colour25 July, 2008 at 9:45 pm #356117Islam is anti-English, anti-Polish, andti everything that isn’t islam.
Labour wana bring this country to its knees, they’re using islam and muslims to fight the natives. They’re using asylum seekers, the eu, anything that is against the core of England.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!