Ian Brady……Right or wrong to resuscitate?

@rubyred wrote:

keep him alive !! He is miserable and in solitude, all he has to look forward to is death.. nah let him live till 100 in sheer misery.

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

@panda12 wrote:

I see the point in keeping him alive to make him suffer, and to not grant him his wish to die but this bloke is a “bed blocker.”

I wouldn’t want any deserving person denied treatment because this piece of shyte is taking up valuable NHS resources.

I Hear ya ! hope it is maybe slightly quicker than anticipated, and very painful..

just..NOT on HIS terms !

@j_in_france wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

@j_in_france wrote:

Quite simply;

What human rights did Ian Brady offer the children he tortured to death?

What did Abu Hamza offer the victims of his hatred who died?

Why are these people offered the right to law in the UK that they use to their own advantage but would never offer to their victims?

Is the law in France different, then?

:shock:

what has French law got to do with British law in either of these two cases as both have happened in the UK? and also why do you need to appear shocked that you mentioned French law rather than UK law in these two cases?

All I said was that sadly British law has made it possible for Abu Hamza to spend several years playing the UK/European system and for Ian Brady to spend nigh on 50 years tormenting his victims in denying them the knowledge of where he buried their son even past their deaths. In neither case did I offer any judgement – all I said was that it was very sad they had been able to do what they have done by using British/European law.

Sometimes human decency disappears when trying to put others down and I have felt great sympathy for the victims of others crimes

What has French law got to do with it?

I’ve highlighted the answer to your own question using your own post – please see above.

Last time I looked, France was part of the EU. No doubt, the French equivalent of Hamza and Brady would also use French / European law to play the system with much the same outcome.

I really cannot stand smug ex-pats like you criticising this country. You chose to live elsewhere so confine your criticism to the country of your choice, not to the country of your birth that you willingly left for “a better life.”

Panda – where have I criticised the UK – all I said was it was sad that the British law system allowed the two cases to happen but if you think it was right that Ian Bennetts mother went to her grave not knowing where Ian Brady was buried then you carry on.

Ruby – nice to see you jumping on the bandwagon but you are the one looking an eejit if you think the two cases are an excuse to have a go at people

Ian Brady, and possibly Abu Hamza and their ilk deny people human rights in fact, in principle and by intention.

The UK Legal system does not deny people their human rights, at least in principle if not always in fact, and not by intention.

I’m very happy indeed that my country’s legal system operates on very different principles than Brady and Hamza.

Long may it continue.