Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › "i wouldn’t be safe walking into town on my own"
-
AuthorPosts
-
8 February, 2008 at 10:23 pm #310915
Its all well and good acting “hard” with these gangs, they may look pubescent, but we’ve all seen many news stories of these so called “all mouth” gangs turning on a usually innocent passer by who gets the beating of his life for no reason, usually ending in death. Just be warned.
9 February, 2008 at 1:27 am #310916@r.O.T.T wrote:
[get a taxi or a bus
Shouldn’t have to, but understanding the point is pointless on you.
9 February, 2008 at 1:30 am #310917Been thinking about this… many many times I have come out of clubs late at night and you know what? the people around me have always been fantastic.
There is a “no go” area in our town that means if you are caught drinking you cannot hang around there so the police deal with it pretty swiftly.
I can walk around my town centre any time of night and feel safe.
By late, all the “immigrants” have done their jobs and gone home to their council houses to sleep with their wives anyway.
Unlike the adulteress homegrown “husbands” out on the pi$$ :wink: the swines!! :lol:
9 February, 2008 at 1:11 pm #310918Been thinking about this… many many times I have come out of clubs late at night and you know what? the people around me have always been fantastic.
Have to agree with you there sharon. I’ve said many times at work that I feel safer walking home at 3am/4am (whenever I finish) than I would at 6pm. Why? At weekends (during the week the place is deserted at that time) all the fighters and aggresive drunks are locked up, all the folk who are emotional cos they’ve had one too many and fell out with their mates or whoever else have gone home (or been locked up until they calm down) and the rest (if there are any left) are standing outside the taxi ranks drunk but in a good mood.
Yet at 6pm, the beggars are often still roaming the streets scrounging money or cigarettes and the groups are often getting into position for the night. The ones who carry knifes etc usually have other things and other people to worry about but I wouldn’t trust them an inch.
9 February, 2008 at 3:35 pm #310919@emmalush wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
[get a taxi or a bus
Shouldn’t have to, but understanding the point is pointless on you.
who walks home from town after a night out
one step forward three backwards
i understand you would be on your own after failing to pull any of the pop supping rastas
a wise move would get a taxi and see if martin the muslim will exchange the fare for a BJ9 February, 2008 at 8:18 pm #310920@r.O.T.T wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
[get a taxi or a bus
Shouldn’t have to, but understanding the point is pointless on you.
who walks home from town after a night out
one step forward three backwards
a wise move would get a taxi and see if martin the muslim will exchange the fare for a BJReality fails you miserably. The POINT is that this girl DOESN’T feel safe, it doesn’t matter what she could do, the POINT is that she shouldn’t HAVE TO.
IF we had a government that PUNISHED bad people properly, then the chances are she and every decent person would feel safe, and would be safe.
IF we lock bad people up for a minimum of TEN years, then they’d be less bad people on our streets. Make them fund their stay too.
Do you understand?
9 February, 2008 at 8:25 pm #310921@emmalush wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
[get a taxi or a bus
Shouldn’t have to, but understanding the point is pointless on you.
who walks home from town after a night out
one step forward three backwards
a wise move would get a taxi and see if martin the muslim will exchange the fare for a BJReality fails you miserably. The POINT is that this girl DOESN’T feel safe, it doesn’t matter what she could do, the POINT is that she shouldn’t HAVE TO.
IF we had a government that PUNISHED bad people properly, then the chances are she and every decent person would feel safe, and would be safe.
IF we lock bad people up for a minimum of TEN years, then they’d be less bad people on our streets. Make them fund their stay too.
Do you understand?
i understand your wrong
i never walk or stumble home
why would anyone do that
part of a night out is getting home
not some obscure point to blame the judiciary for9 February, 2008 at 8:34 pm #310922@r.O.T.T wrote:
i understand your wrong
part of a night out is getting home
not some obscure point to blame the judiciary forYou’ve just explained why im right, you use extra safety to get home when you shouldn’t have to. And no one said anything about leaving town, or it being at night.
Your ability to understand this subject is too hard for you.
9 February, 2008 at 8:39 pm #310923@emmalush wrote:
@r.O.T.T wrote:
i understand your wrong
part of a night out is getting home
not some obscure point to blame the judiciary forYou’ve just explained why im right, you use extra safety to get home when you shouldn’t have to. And no one said anything about leaving town, or it being at night.
Your ability to understand this subject is too hard for you.
so who is responsible for the young teenager?
would anyone think it wise for a young teenager to walk alone into a town centre .
surely any parent/guardian who pays for said dancing lessons would ensure the getting to and from said lessons was done in such a way to ensure maximum safety.
people have attacked people since time began9 February, 2008 at 8:48 pm #310924 -
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!