-
Posts
-
No. Cannibalism isn’t wrong because of any of that stuff. It’s wrong because it necessarily hurts people who weren’t given the choice of whether they wanted to be hurt. That is, the cannibalised. This doesn’t apply to consensual sodomy. The reasoning is flawed.
No. Cannibalism isn’t wrong because of any of that stuff. It’s wrong because it necessarily hurts people who weren’t given the choice of whether they wanted to be hurt. That is, the cannibalised. This doesn’t apply to consensual sodomy. The reasoning is flawed.
This can only count if the victim of the cannibal died for the purpose of it….would you then say cannibalism is unnatural ?
In terms of being “natural” it plainly is not, it is a gross deviation from “nature” as defined earlier in my opinion…..Because homosexual activity is carried out by animals does not equate it to being “natural”, again i point out that the animal is not bound by conscience, anatomical knowledge or shame, in short, they know no betterAnimals are driven by primal urges, desires and needs which are completely natural. Sexual attraction is a natural thing. We are animals therefore it is natural, society dictates ethics which are un natural.
@nemesis wrote:
Animals are driven by primal urges, desires and needs which are completely natural. Sexual attraction is a natural thing. We are animals therefore it is natural, society dictates ethics which are un natural.
Yes, i accept that partly. What is it that distinguishes humans from all other species ?
Self awareness
Expand a bit on that
We are self aware, we can apply thought to our action, we understand consequence. Instinct isn`t thought out, it`s natural, all animals have instinct, man has freedom of thought too
an awareness of your existence, with knowledge of private thought, an identity.
I agree, this then means humankind are guided by moral thought, conscience, knowledge and of course power, it is precisley these conditions that i set out my opinion that the act of sodomy is indeed unnatural as defined by what we humans denote as civilised, moral and conscientious….When the animal carries out the act of cannibalism for instance, the civilised will denounce this because it goes against the principles of humanity, how then can we equate the act of sodomy to escape the same denounciation because it gives pleasure….. I believe we cannot deviate from principle simply because it gives pleasure…… there are many ways to show affection and love without intercourse, anal or otherwise, the human of course has mastered these ways…
@gazlan wrote:
@nemesis wrote:
Animals are driven by primal urges, desires and needs which are completely natural. Sexual attraction is a natural thing. We are animals therefore it is natural, society dictates ethics which are un natural.
Yes, i accept that partly. What is it that distinguishes humans from all other species ?
cruelty and greed
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!