-
Posts
-
@gazlan wrote:
……….its bleeding hilarious
:lol: :lol: :lol:
ooooops didn’t realise I said that :lol:
@kent f OBE wrote:
@gazlan wrote:
……….its bleeding hilarious
:lol: :lol: :lol:
ooooops didn’t realise I said that :lol:
Blonde moment !!!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Typical man …… only sees/hears/reads what he wants!!!!
:shock:
Typical man ……
Natural or un-natural…. :o
@gazlan wrote:
To the God fearing pious….anyone commiting such acts should be put to death according to the main religions….
The question posed in the thread is `homosexuality-natural or un-natural……..of course, defining natural is always a contentious issue, in terms of biological thinking, natural means to me the reproduction of life, given that the `natural ` means of reproduction is by way of inception and conception through the participation of sexual intercourse between two bodies….i will add, this inception process mainly incorperates a degree of lust/attraction…in terms of homosexuality and reproduction, i class the acts of homosexuals to be un-natural…..in terms of lust/attraction…..then of course it is a personal decision.
Not forgetting that the intestinal system which includes the endpoint the anus which, naturally is the means of disposing of bodily waste…the act of using the anus for self gratification in my opinion must be considered a devious deviation from nature……i conclude then, any behaviour using the anus for self gratfication must be considered un-natural and cannot be justified.
I appreciate any comments which can justify the acts carried out by the homosexual.. :!:Debate anyone ???????????????????????
@gazlan wrote:
Natural or un-natural???? any views ??? :!:
If you study primates such as chimpanzees they all have sexual relations with each other… boys with boys… girls with girls… and it is a social thing. So considering that chimps are our closest ancestor it is little wonder that human beings also occasionally have these tendancies. Therefore in your arguement I pose the thought that it is completely natural but if you asked if it was conformist then I would say no and that is the crux of the matter. Each to their own I say.
What I want to know is.. why do cows try and mount other cows? Erm, its not like they have strops ons is it. And their udders must get in the way a tad.
oh erm..
i meant strap ons :D
@minim wrote:
What I want to know is.. why do cows try and mount other cows? Erm, its not like they have strops ons is it. And their udders must get in the way a tad.
There plainly sick arent they ? Next thing, people will be saying its natural :o
@melody wrote:
@gazlan wrote:
Natural or un-natural???? any views ??? :!:
If you study primates such as chimpanzees they all have sexual relations with each other… boys with boys… girls with girls… and it is a social thing. So considering that chimps are our closest ancestor it is little wonder that human beings also occasionally have these tendancies. Therefore in your arguement I pose the thought that it is completely natural but if you asked if it was conformist then I would say no and that is the crux of the matter. Each to their own I say.
Ok, lets look at primates, some of these indulge in cannibalism……We have had people who have and probably still do in some parts of the world indulge in this, what do people in general do when they know of this activity ? They condemn it as barbaric. I don’t think many would pass the comment “each to their own “regarding this… …You see, this is the difference between humankind and the animal world. Humankind has established mind control and co-ordination, the term natural is established on a set of points and values we believe to be “normal “…when I refer to “normal “ I mean within the concept of bodily functions and our understanding of them, I simply point out that the body’s waste system is exactly that, as prescribed by academics and the like, it follows on that the sexual gratification these homosexuals gain from their activity is not “normal” as set out above.
In my opinion, these animals and people who take part in these acts cannot re-define “natural” as it is generally understood….For instance, if overnight the majority of the world began eating the flesh of their neighbour, this would not change my opinion on what is “natural”, if this occurred I believe it would be highly un-natural.
PS~ hope reading this hasn’t distracted you from anything important like, watching auf weidesein pet or baking stotty kyek :wink:
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!