Heres hoping

Well, i really am overwhelmed….i can honestly say that i have never had so much attention in such a short space of time by so many lovey ladies….in fact, so much so, i`m gonna whistle in public…. 8)

maybe my fuse was a tad short on this occasion, might i assume forgivness from you ? :D
Of course, in my original post i sought opinion, i cant deny that some have been given.
The link is actually to a true case in wirral, whereby a man was invited to appear at the magistrates court. The local council seeking a liability order upon the man. He having refused to pay his due council tax, provided a reason for his non of payment to the council, the non-payment, as far as i read it; involved citation of the common law in which he claimed the council had no right to make any such demands upon him and, the court being part of a “corperation” was in no position to make judgement. I believe in common law, such judgements can only be made by a court de jure…….the council, withdrew the summons and also agreed that the tax was to be written off and, no charge be made.
Its a very interesting case in which a precedence can be sought….
Its not so much a case of wanting to pay the tax or not, rather a situation of the tax being lawfull or unlawfull. This case appears to show the latter. Not having gone to trial of course, no precedence can be made.
You girls really are content, i hope you realise that i am very grateful for your effort in replying.
ps- i know your not a girlie will… :lol: Thanks again, i can see i`m gonna have to be bit more careful with you girls, so delicate n`all…. :wink:

Wow…quick off the mark as well…. :shock: …..i`m out of here while i still can….enjoy your day…and what a bright day it is, bye-bye..for now.. :wink: