-
AuthorPosts
-
7 August, 2012 at 9:23 pm #506336
@panda12 wrote:
@irish_lucy wrote:
I would if i could, i’ve just trolled through 16 pages on the F3 boards and even went through thin’s post on his profile up to page 6, when he got banned his thread – new guides – must have been deleted too. But its clear to see from this thread noone has forgotten about it.
I put this search into Google – not the crap search tool in here:
“Just chat” AND “new guides”
It brings back this – click on it to view it properly:
The link is:
https://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?p=753064&sid=ed07775ff47dd86ef669070f16f8a3b4
But the thread has disappeared… :-k
You amaze me panda… so blooming clever :shock:
7 August, 2012 at 9:39 pm #506337@mrs_teapot wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@irish_lucy wrote:
I would if i could, i’ve just trolled through 16 pages on the F3 boards and even went through thin’s post on his profile up to page 6, when he got banned his thread – new guides – must have been deleted too. But its clear to see from this thread noone has forgotten about it.
I put this search into Google – not the crap search tool in here:
“Just chat” AND “new guides”
It brings back this – click on it to view it properly:
The link is:
https://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?p=753064&sid=ed07775ff47dd86ef669070f16f8a3b4
But the thread has disappeared… :-k
You amaze me panda… so blooming clever :shock:
Boolean Logic, Teapot!
7 August, 2012 at 9:44 pm #506338@j_in_france wrote:
@minim wrote:
and to pre-empt your next response…..
you only said you had a French certificate…… not a CRB
and ……….yes I have… and mine is enhanced ner ner ner
as I have been in France since 2004 well before enhanced CRB checks were initiated it really means naff all except I have passed CRB checks in two countries to your one
It means naff all anyway, as you so rightly put in an earlier thread, because they may be nearly safe, but people “slip through”. So two CRB checks are just as useless as one.
7 August, 2012 at 9:45 pm #506339@panda12 wrote:
@mrs_teapot wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@irish_lucy wrote:
I would if i could, i’ve just trolled through 16 pages on the F3 boards and even went through thin’s post on his profile up to page 6, when he got banned his thread – new guides – must have been deleted too. But its clear to see from this thread noone has forgotten about it.
I put this search into Google – not the crap search tool in here:
“Just chat” AND “new guides”
It brings back this – click on it to view it properly:
The link is:
https://www.justchat.co.uk/boards/viewtopic.php?p=753064&sid=ed07775ff47dd86ef669070f16f8a3b4
But the thread has disappeared… :-k
You amaze me panda… so blooming clever :shock:
Boolean Logic, Teapot!
I favourited it will read it tomorrow.. thank you :D
7 August, 2012 at 9:51 pm #506340and in boolean logic that would be
If CRB(CRB) = “English” and CRB(CRB) = “French” and != “caught” and >=99.99%
then
begin
“J in France” = 00.01%
end
report “numpty” nl7 August, 2012 at 10:26 pm #506341@j_in_france wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
@j_in_france wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
But whichever country your check is done in, no matter how strict the checks, all a CRB says is that you’ve never been caught therefore don’t have a criminal record…just saying :wink:
Interesting how someone can call someone else a paedophile without any proof then get upset when someone else bandies the same accusation at them…just saying.
So you may be a shoplifter, drunk driver and child beater but it matters not because you have never been caught for doing so? just saying
Perhaps you would like to post where I have ever called anyone a pedophile so that everyone can see that? just saying
Did you deliberately miss the point? It does matter if you’re a shoplifter, a drunk driver, a child beater, whether you’ve been caught or not…but…the point you seem to have missed…if you haven’t been caught then you won’t have a criminal record hence you will pass a CRB…hence all a CRB proves is that you haven’t got a criminal record, not that you are not a shoplifter, drunk driver or child beater.
So did you not call thin ice a paedophile? or was that someone else?
As I said post where I said he was a pedophile – don’t hide behind false claims – just saying
Firstly, you know that the thread in question has been deleted as the “discussion” on that thread got quite nasty.
Secondly, as I recall you’re right, you didn’t explicitly call thin ice a paedophile. After all, straight-out accusations aren’t your style, unsubtle hints and innuendo are. You didn’t call thin ice a paedophile; you just dragged up an old and long forgotten section of another thread where someone else accused him of it, and posted the link in a thread where it was out of context, then sat there fanning the flames. Is that better I wonder?7 August, 2012 at 10:44 pm #5063427 August, 2012 at 10:52 pm #506343Yes those two but I seem to recall there was another thread too, one with more of an exchange between J and thin ice on the subject…now Miss Marple, can you find that one? :lol:
7 August, 2012 at 10:53 pm #506344@jen_jen wrote:
Yes those two but I seem to recall there was another thread too, one with more of an exchange between J and thin ice on the subject…now Miss Marple, can you find that one? :lol:
I think it was the New Guides thread but that has disappeared. Thin was talking about new chat guides and J thought he was talking about girl guides and it all took off from there.
7 August, 2012 at 10:56 pm #506345That’s the one…
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!