Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Has your child been wrongly forced finger printing?
-
AuthorPosts
-
28 August, 2006 at 9:08 pm #237491
@slayer wrote:
1. Zero tolerance for all crimes
3. More prisons, longer sentences, no parole, no remission
4. Increase in income tax of 2p for 25,000 more police officers on the beatSimple…..really
I agree with that. If we did the above, we would have less crime, which would mean we wouldn’t need to enforce finger printing, or any other anti-liberty procedure.
When are you and lamby going to ask the government to keep better tabs on you…you guys are potential criminals, we need to watch you closely :D
28 August, 2006 at 9:18 pm #237492I told you this is happening, it always starts on a very small scale, but as the guallable general public become at ease with it, it grows.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/4246768.stm
PAY ATTENTION
29 August, 2006 at 12:25 am #237493@emmalush wrote:
I told you this is happening, it always starts on a very small scale, but as the guallable general public become at ease with it, it grows.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/4246768.stm
PAY ATTENTION
In emmaworld, money grows on trees doesn’t it? :roll:
29 August, 2006 at 10:02 am #237494@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
In emmaworld, money grows on trees doesn’t it? :roll:
EH?
11 September, 2006 at 1:26 pm #237495100% for a national DNA database, ID cards…. the works!
I live within the law no bother.
12 September, 2006 at 12:53 pm #237496@sabriel wrote:
100% for a national DNA database, ID cards…. the works!
I live within the law no bother.
If you live within the law, why do you need detecting?
12 September, 2006 at 7:18 pm #237497I don’t need detecting so far.
but would be happy to be swabbed and my kids to have had a dna test at birth. If that ment a the national data base would provide a quick apprehension of anyone who raped me on my way home or worse still messed with my childrens innocence.
I feel that my views did change very strongly when i became a mother.
The camera thing i feel is more of a violation of privacy issue the view i am expressing purely the use of dna profiling in convicting people.
12 September, 2006 at 10:16 pm #237498@sabriel wrote:
I don’t need detecting so far.
No need for you to have an i.d card then :wink:
but would be happy to be swabbed and my kids to have had a dna test at birth. If that ment a the national data base would provide a quick apprehension of anyone who raped me on my way home or worse still messed with my childrens innocence.
How about whenever a criminal commits a crime, we bang them up untill they die. Ok, so dna database might help catch people, i agree, but if we had a TUFF on crime attitude, less crime would be committed.
I feel that my views did change very strongly when i became a mother.
I understand your concern, your no different to most of us, but we need a stronger deterent, then you wouldn’t need to worry so much.
The camera thing i feel is more of a violation of privacy issue the view i am expressing purely the use of dna profiling in convicting people.
If we give in to small databasing and i.d cards, cameras will follow. Its a slippery slope way of controlling us.
BANG THEM UP FOR LIFE! They’ll never do it again.13 September, 2006 at 8:47 am #237499I do agree that the state of our sentencing system is pathetic.
A dna/finger print data base and a tough prison system working hand in hand would be an excellent deterent.
At the moment i doubt many criminals think ” if i commit this crime it is highly likely i will be caught, convicted quickly and sentenced many years breaking rocks”. Its more like “they will never catch me and if they do it highly unlikely i will get a custodial sentance, which is a shame as i want to brush up on my playsation skills”
ho hum.
13 September, 2006 at 4:35 pm #237500Not sure what it is, but a big percentage of people who get banged up, learn other criminal behaviour inside and re-offend.
So most of the crime that occurs is by people with greater criminal knowledge, who we let free.
The chances of anyone being a victim is low, but it would be the opposite of a lottery win if we didnt let them go, thus the police service would be able to cope without finger printing infringement, camera watching big brother dictatorship, ego maniac control freaks.
Government turn a blind eye to enough crime so that they have an “excusse” to “watch over us for our own safety…”
Say no to control freaks, however small the control might seem.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!