-
Posts
-
Yup it sure does Witey.
But you know there’s nothing wrong with pre-nuptial agreements these days especially with a couple like yourselves both of who are bringing all their tangible assets together in the marriage. If the worst should happen and you get divorced a short while after you are married, I am sure that you would want your ex-wife to want for nothing without the need to fight for her rights through the Courts.
She could have a full entitlement to your pension fund for example, a substantial share of your earnings over the years after you get divorced and so on.
Oh and do remember that on marriage she is entitled to a share in your estate when you die so if you want to leave anything to somebody else you will need to alter your Will.
I hope that this helps you in this, you big step into the unknown.
@forumhostpb wrote:
Well I was referring to the High Court judgement this week that allowed a divorced wife to claim a substantial share in her husband’s assets even though she had not contributed directly to their acquisition. The fact that she had given up a potential carreer to be married entitled her to a big payout from his assets, even though only being married a relatively short period of time.
It is said that pre-nuptial agreements could get round this by setting out a ”fair share” of the assets before the marriage took place – even though these agreements are not directly recognised in English matrimonial law.
So it seemed to me that Witey and Gizmo ought to consider a ‘pre nup’ before they get married so that when they get divorced shortly afterwards , they won’t fight over the assets.
but then i can understand the scepticism BUT as i pointed out we both been in long term relationships before but with total idiots who didnt know how to keep a relationship going but we both know how to hold a relationship together and there for to put your doubts to rest we are confident as a couple that it will work and i also must point out the fact we arnt getting married until next year even though we are already are engeaged we arnt rushing into marraige so lay your doubts to rest love can happen on JC and has b4 i know of at least two couples who have been together for a long time living together who met on JC so it does happen :roll: :roll: :roll:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Well I was referring to the High Court judgement this week that allowed a divorced wife to claim a substantial share in her husband’s assets even though she had not contributed directly to their acquisition. The fact that she had given up a potential carreer to be married entitled her to a big payout from his assets, even though only being married a relatively short period of time.
It is said that pre-nuptial agreements could get round this by setting out a ”fair share” of the assets before the marriage took place – even though these agreements are not directly recognised in English matrimonial law.
So it seemed to me that Witey and Gizmo ought to consider a ‘pre nup’ before they get married so that when they get divorced shortly afterwards, they won’t fight over the assets.
Has witey has already stated were are not getting married for another yr yet and we both no what we are entering into and dont intend to enter it lightly. I myself are very much like witey in the fact i intend to marry once and that would and will be for life. I know and dont doubt the fact that witey is the one i should be marrying.
But you know there’s nothing wrong with pre-nuptial agreements these days especially with a couple like yourselves both of who are bringing all their tangible assets together in the marriage. If the worst should happen and you get divorced a short while after you are married, I am sure that you would want your ex-wife to want for nothing without the need to fight for her rights through the Courts.
She could have a full entitlement to your pension fund for example, a substantial share of your earnings over the years after you get divorced and so on.
Oh and do remember that on marriage she is entitled to a share in your estate when you die so if you want to leave anything to somebody else you will need to alter your Will.
I hope that this helps you in this, you big step into the unknown.
PB has i know that you know witey personaly i can see that ur just lookin out for him and in some cases yes pre nups are a good thing, but in our case i also take it as an insult to my self due to you not knowing myself or what im like.People offline and online that know me know that im not like that and rest assured i would and will be putting just as much in to the relationship and marraige as witey will be, and in reference to entitlment when getting married that goes both ways and if by chance witey should die b4 me i would not stand in the way of whoever hed left anything to.
I am a very independent women, i might add in which any person i know well, would tell you.
I would also like to add that there are also two people taking the big step, entering into the unknown has u would call it, id prefer to call it a long standing commitment between two people that wish to show the world how much they care and love one another!!!
I am delighted that you both have found ‘true love’ and if i was a Vicar i’d offer to marry you both myself. Sadly I’m not so another Vicar will have the pleasure.
BTW pre-nuptial agreements are only really necessary when one or both parties have substantial assets before the marriage. Naturally, I know nothing of your personal circumstances, so the advice to enter into one is only to offer protection to either person’s psition should it be warranted.
Oh and you didn’t tell us where the Wedding List will be so that we can buy wedding presents for you that you will both want.
For the information of everyone who intends on helping us celebrate our big day we will put a post up stating date time and place of the wedding in the form of a invitation for all and hmmmmmmmm PB let us think the prezzy list hmmmm u can pay for the weddin if ya like lmao
we would just like you to bring yourselves that would be enough of a present to us helping us celebrate the day :D/
PS. hope you lot can sing as gizzy wants a karioke at the evening do :D/ :D/ i just [-o< that u can
:-k i feel a case of larengitus comin on that night :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
OK that works for me – I’ll sing if a) you’re adequately insured (against ear damage b) everybody is so pissed they don’t care what it sounds like anyway and c) you have a selection of ’60’s music to sing along to.
lmao ok PB ile sort the insurance,make sure that everyone is pissed
and dont worry ive all ways got 60s music :lol: :lol: :D/ :D/@forumhostpb wrote:
Well I was referring to the High Court judgement this week that allowed a divorced wife to claim a substantial share in her husband’s assets even though she had not contributed directly to their acquisition. The fact that she had given up a potential carreer to be married entitled her to a big payout from his assets, even though only being married a relatively short period of time.
It is said that pre-nuptial agreements could get round this by setting out a ”fair share” of the assets before the marriage took place – even though these agreements are not directly recognised in English matrimonial law.
So it seemed to me that Witey and Gizmo ought to consider a ‘pre nup’ before they get married so that when they get divorced shortly afterwards, they won’t fight over the assets.
who ever said that true love never dies obviously hadn’t met PB …… :wink:
Sorry it has took me so long to get on the boards and say that ima so happy for the both of you and you can just see that JC relationships do really work i cant wait to see you both again Mucker says congrats to ya both as well. ( sis i love the ring its lovley) mwahhhhhhhhhh luv yas both x x x x
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!