Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum one boards › Gratz to Witey and little Giz on there Engagement

Viewing 10 posts - 41 through 50 (of 173 total)
1 … 4 5 6 … 18
  • Author
    Posts
  • 23 May, 2006 at 9:25 pm #212291

    acebabe25f

    Good on ya xoxoxo

    23 May, 2006 at 9:42 pm #212292

    Anonymous

    awww its lovely Gizz congrats hunny xxxx :)

    24 May, 2006 at 3:28 pm #212293

    TADpole

    Lovely ring.

    24 May, 2006 at 9:59 pm #212294

    little gizmo

    @lukey wrote:

    woohoo, go witey, always knew u were a bloke of class an style, all th best 2 ya both, an giz, it is u tht is th bad influence, not me *runs away*

    lmfao lukey im a good girl allways was and always will be and no good runin ile just wait till we see u again :lol: :lol: :lol:

    sweets pml hun and it is a lovely ring in a class of its own :lol:

    thanks to the rest of u that wishes us well it means alot thank you :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

    26 May, 2006 at 11:15 pm #212295

    ForumHostPB

    In view of the recent news – will you both be having a pre-nuptial agreement????

    27 May, 2006 at 5:30 pm #212296

    little gizmo

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    In view of the recent news – will you both be having a pre-nuptial agreement????

    pml PB no we aint having a pre-nuptial agreement has theres no point hun,

    and wats that about in view of recent news all about wat have u heard?

    27 May, 2006 at 5:59 pm #212297

    ForumHostPB

    @little gizmo wrote:

    @forumhostpb wrote:

    In view of the recent news – will you both be having a pre-nuptial agreement????

    pml PB no we aint having a pre-nuptial agreement has theres no point hun,

    and whats that about ”in view of recent news” all about what have you heard?

    You don’t really want me to put this on the message boards do you????

    27 May, 2006 at 9:14 pm #212298

    angel1

    tut PB now u got to say lol

    27 May, 2006 at 10:43 pm #212299

    ForumHostPB

    Well I was referring to the High Court judgement this week that allowed a divorced wife to claim a substantial share in her husband’s assets even though she had not contributed directly to their acquisition. The fact that she had given up a potential carreer to be married entitled her to a big payout from his assets, even though only being married a relatively short period of time.

    It is said that pre-nuptial agreements could get round this by setting out a ”fair share” of the assets before the marriage took place – even though these agreements are not directly recognised in English matrimonial law.

    So it seemed to me that Witey and Gizmo ought to consider a ‘pre nup’ before they get married so that when they get divorced shortly afterwards, they won’t fight over the assets.

    28 May, 2006 at 11:56 am #212300

    witey

    :shock: :shock: :shock: who mentioned devorce this word has no meaning to me i only getting married once an once only and i have found my partner for life bare in mind we have both been in relationships before and lived with our ex partners therefore we both know exactly what we are getting into and are fully aware of the work and patience needed to make a relationship work so as for divorce the answer is NOT A CHANCE IN HELL aint even an option

    we are both very happy together and have spent a lot of time together and get on exceptionally well hence the engagement we both know how we feel so as my other half stated no need for pre nuptual agreements

    hope this answers your question PB m8 :) :)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 41 through 50 (of 173 total)
1 … 4 5 6 … 18

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!