Girlfriends of EVIL men

Many good points. Thank many responding.

Mooosey brings out excellent points.

Some times our professional who prescribe medications may or may not take themself. But agree many sure use for own personal needs..

Also those sadly who have had severe accidents may be provided addictive products till better, but may become dependant as not wanting to feel the pain. Heard this many many times. Rather have addiction than suffer in pain. Life too hard.

As with consents, maturity, right, wrong,…parents educators, and reading every ones good points, bottom line it still comes down to the individual and decisions they make…..our decisions alone are the ones in which we favor no matter if others see it right or wrong.

As I use to like actual studies for comparison, recently found out as well that the controller of an experiment can influence or change out comes…of study…throwing in variables.

As for charts, comparison studies good, but now you go back to who accessible to getting drugs, alcohol, so forth..country..community…age

So if you really really look at this strongly, logically, comes down to human race, individual needs and desires. I have. I have pulled all your thoughts and ideas together, all….and this in my opinion is bottom line, us, our decision….

2 members liked this post.

sceptical guy, mooosey88

mooosey88 wrote:

Oh Mr Nuttall of graphgate gets a mention here ”Many factors determine whether you’ll become addicted to a drug: your genetic makeup, social history, the drugs your friends take, how much money you make. But the chemical makeup of drugs guarantee that certain drugs are more addictive than others. The hardest ones to kick—heroin, for instance—actually train your brain to crave them. A team of researchers led by professor David Nutt of London’s Imperial College recently set out to determine which drugs were most harmful based on their addictive properties (the resulting article suggested that alcohol and tobacco are more harmful than cannabis and ecstasy, and led to Nutt getting sacked as the UK’s top drug adviser). ”

David Nutt, for those who don’t read the painter’s autograph at the bottom left hand of the picture, is the author of the research graph quoted as gospel truth by Mr Bollox.

secret unicorn wrote:

I came back to find out what the red-herring was only to find the thread has moved on somewhat since then.

Think pat was the last one to have the fish though this might be another red herring or goldfish.

The bit about lot’s wife might also be a red herring though this should be taken with a pinch of salt.

sceptical guy wrote:

mooosey88 wrote:

Oh Mr Nuttall of graphgate gets a mention here ”Many factors determine whether you’ll become addicted to a drug: your genetic makeup, social history, the drugs your friends take, how much money you make. But the chemical makeup of drugs guarantee that certain drugs are more addictive than others. The hardest ones to kick—heroin, for instance—actually train your brain to crave them. A team of researchers led by professor David Nutt of London’s Imperial College recently set out to determine which drugs were most harmful based on their addictive properties (the resulting article suggested that alcohol and tobacco are more harmful than cannabis and ecstasy, and led to Nutt getting sacked as the UK’s top drug adviser). ”

David Nutt, for those who don’t read the painter’s autograph at the bottom left hand of the picture, is the author of the research graph quoted as gospel truth by Mr Bollox.

I knew dat

mooosey88 wrote:

Ge wrote:

Ge wrote:

One other thing occurred to me while I was meditating on my yoga mat. I bet you 3 Greggs sausage rolls that the author/s of ‘graphgate’ (I like that) are members of the pro cannabis lobby… Do I get a gold star?

Actually I do get a gold star. I look forward to being presented with it by one of the lovely JC ladies, bikini clad of course. David Nutt… Oh dearie me. Pro cannabis, a neuropsychopharmacology expert. But back to ‘graphgate’, Nutt himself says ” “Overall, alcohol is the most harmful drug because it’s so widely used” and of course his ‘research’ doesn’t take into account, at all, the lack of availability of “illegal” drugs” and so obviously far less people use them. Meaning his findings don’t mean very much at all. I do also recall Mr Graphgate producing the same graph during a defense of cannabis use. I got your number! *shy smile*

I said dat I said dat

Lol. You probably did but I only bloody wanted the bikini clad gold star award, innit!

Pouts like Michael Caine!

1 member liked this post.

sceptical guy