Boards Index General discussion Getting serious Girlfriends of EVIL men

Viewing 10 posts - 131 through 140 (of 452 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1094154

    Ge

    I was going to respond to Sceptical from last night but Draculina has left me so worn out I can barely type.

     

    :cry:

    #1094155

    Draculina has left me so worn out I can barely type.

    ;-)

    #1094156

    In a court of law, “penetration” is not the only consideration in a rape charge, besides evidence of a kit used in hospital with samples no longer than 72 hours old.

    BUT also if the victim applied the words, “NO.” In this case any person who is aware, forceable tries acts, told no, considered an assault on one’s person…….penetrated or not…

    2 members liked this post.
    #1094158

    In a court of law, “penetration” is not the only consideration in a rape charge, besides evidence of a kit used in hospital with samples no longer than 72 hours old. BUT also if the victim applied the words, “NO.” In this case any person who is aware, forceable tries acts, told no, considered an assault on one’s person…….penetrated or not…

    We are talking about UK law.

    #1094159

    Ge

    Ge I can’t find any research to say UK is worse than any other country in Europe or indeed the world for paedophilia, could you let me know where this comes from please ?

    I can’t find it online. I do know it is a research paper and I do know I have references to it but among realms of other paper in my loft, which I can’t be arsed sifting through. I am happy to concede the claim without evidence to back it up. Also I may well have been referring to imprisonment rates which of course isn’t the same thing. I really can’t recall specifically other than quoting from it more than a decade ago.

     

    :wacko:

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 7 months ago by  Ge.
    #1094161

    In a court of law, “penetration” is not the only consideration in a rape charge, besides evidence of a kit used in hospital with samples no longer than 72 hours old. BUT also if the victim applied the words, “NO.” In this case any person who is aware, forceable tries acts, told no, considered an assault on one’s person…….penetrated or not…

    We are talking about UK law.

    Its basically the same

    #1094162

    Also penetration does not have to be by a penis

    #1094163

    Ge I can’t find any research to say UK is worse than any other country in Europe or indeed the world for paedophilia, could you let me know where this comes from please ?

    I can’t find it online. I do know it is a research paper and I do know I have references to it but among realms of other paper in my loft, which I can’t be arsed sifting through. I am happy to concede the claim without evidence to back it up. Also I may well have been referring to imprisonment rates which of course isn’t the same thing. I really can’t recall specifically other than quoting from it more than a decade ago. :wacko:

    Thanks,  I do believe that it ‘appears’ rife in the UK because of the recent targeting on gangs in recent years, thank god, and that may fit in with your theory of imprisonment figures that you’ve read up on too

    #1094164

    Ge

    Interestingly though while I looked, Germany deals with paedophilia in a far more grown up manner than the “burn them at the stake” British, their system provides support and “treatment” to paedophiles well before any actual offense is committed and apparently is quite successful in cutting offending rates.

     

    :yes:

     

     

    #1094165

    Also penetration does not have to be by a penis

    The law is very specific that it does :unsure:

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/42/section/1

Viewing 10 posts - 131 through 140 (of 452 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!