Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › fox hunting
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 February, 2010 at 12:22 am #432375
Exactlyyyyyyyy fox hunting actually kills very few foxes because the hounds just aint quick enough or clever enough to catch YOUNG FIT FOXES as a rule they are only able to catch the old and infirm, and that pete is natural order, “survival of the fittest”, hunting eradicates the ones that can cause us and indeed themselves a problem and keeps the healthy ones healthy but removing the sick, thats what i have said since my very first post saying its a shame how quickly the ban has effected the fox population already for the worse.
24 February, 2010 at 12:25 am #432376Oh and hounds dont know better either they are doing what is natural ok u might argue a man takes them out there but the chasing and killing is what is natural, and they aim to kill naturally by getting the kill over asap, not playing with their prey. I know if it was me id rather be killed pretty quickly rather than be battered and broken for hours on end and them left to die in agony, before maybe being eaten. But anyway thats somthing else again, time i was in bed, night x
24 February, 2010 at 12:29 am #432377The hunt kills very few because it’s cheaper to shoot them than to own a horse and a pack of dogs costs far less, it is not natural to hunt with dogs. Fox numbers are still stable and are expected to remain stable. Death from disease although not nice is natural, we kill because we can and no one and nothing can stop of if its what we want to do. Control is an excuse, nothing more
24 February, 2010 at 12:48 am #432378@pete wrote:
The hunt kills very few because it’s cheaper to shoot them than to own a horse and a pack of dogs costs far less, it is not natural to hunt with dogs. Fox numbers are still stable and are expected to remain stable. Death from disease although not nice is natural, we kill because we can and no one and nothing can stop of if its what we want to do. Control is an excuse, nothing more
Pete im sorry but “you what?” the hunt kills very few cos its cheaper too shoot them ?? the hunt kills very few because the hounds cant bloody catch em its as simple as that, yes to a degree its always been an excuse and alot of the hunt riders esp the kids are not there for the blood but for the fun of the ride, i dont deny that, … but … it is natural for dogs to hunt and infact if you go back to caveman days they would follow animals that caught prey to try and chase the wolves for example away and have the kill themselves so in a way u could say is a natural thing for man to do in that respect. but even if it isnt natural to follow, it is still natural for the dog to hunt. Fox numbers are still stable yes but they have fallen and the increase in disease in them and domestic diseases related to foxes HAS risen. Sarcoptic Mange is a real problem in domestic dogs in the last couple of years and terrible to see and a nightmare to treat causing alot of misery and seeing a fox with mange is actually heartbreaking as usually by the time they are out being seen with it they are really bad with it and it really is an horrendous thing to see. And yes we kill because we can, every time we eat meat or fish we have even if indirectly killed. And i repeat shooting isnt the best answer for the fox species. If we just left them and didnt hunt or shoot or trap them they would actually manage and control themselves usually from disease but the disease they carry can cause us problems that we dont really want or need.
24 February, 2010 at 7:10 am #432379@(f)politics? wrote:
@pete wrote:
The hunt kills very few because it’s cheaper to shoot them than to own a horse and a pack of dogs costs far less, it is not natural to hunt with dogs. Fox numbers are still stable and are expected to remain stable. Death from disease although not nice is natural, we kill because we can and no one and nothing can stop of if its what we want to do. Control is an excuse, nothing more
Pete im sorry but “you what?” the hunt kills very few cos its cheaper too shoot them ?? the hunt kills very few because the hounds cant bloody catch em its as simple as that, yes to a degree its always been an excuse and alot of the hunt riders esp the kids are not there for the blood but for the fun of the ride, i dont deny that, … but … it is natural for dogs to hunt and infact if you go back to caveman days they would follow animals that caught prey to try and chase the wolves for example away and have the kill themselves so in a way u could say is a natural thing for man to do in that respect. but even if it isnt natural to follow, it is still natural for the dog to hunt. Fox numbers are still stable yes but they have fallen and the increase in disease in them and domestic diseases related to foxes HAS risen. Sarcoptic Mange is a real problem in domestic dogs in the last couple of years and terrible to see and a nightmare to treat causing alot of misery and seeing a fox with mange is actually heartbreaking as usually by the time they are out being seen with it they are really bad with it and it really is an horrendous thing to see. And yes we kill because we can, every time we eat meat or fish we have even if indirectly killed. And i repeat shooting isnt the best answer for the fox species. If we just left them and didnt hunt or shoot or trap them they would actually manage and control themselves usually from disease but the disease they carry can cause us problems that we dont really want or need.
Poli
You think fox hunting kills the old and infim – natural selection?
Read up on “cubbing” poli – find out what that involves and how the hunt members circle round a wooded area known to contain fox cubs as young as a few months old. The hounds are sent in to kill them and the cubs have no chance of escape as the hunt followers drive and frighten them back into the wooded area by banging their saddles and shouting.
You think it still doesn’t happen post ban? Read the Horse and Hound hunt forum.
And you think digging out a fox that has gone to ground and chucking it to the hounds alive to be ripped apart is controlling the old and infirm? Natural selection is it? Smacks of sheer bloodlust to me.
It’s deplorable and sick and like cubbing and hunting in general, is no “sport” at all.
And you really want to find out about deer and stag hunting. Is it really necessary to chase an animal like a deer or stag across miles of countryside to then shoot it? Why not just shoot it on sight and forget about the chase?
Oh, and look at carted deer hunting in Ireland. A deer or stag is taken to an enclosed area and then hunted for hours until it gives up exhausted. It’s not killed – no it’s usually severely injured from trying to jump barbed wire fences and getting it legs caught and torn. Then, it’s taken back to its herd – barely alive – but will again face the same ordeal another day. And the justification for this? It helps train jump jockeys! Well that makes it all right then.
The overriding factor about hunting with hounds is – it is all down to blood lust. The hunt followers want the thrill of the chase followed by the death. There is no other justification for them wanting the ban repealed. It has nothing to do with conservation at all.
If animal numbers need to be controlled then use trained, paid marksmen who can do it with a clean, quick and humane kill with a quota on finding the old and infirm and diseased without all the bloodlust and socialising involved in hunting with hounds. And ban farmers and any other gun toting idiot from roaming the countryside looking to shoot anything that moves.
For God’s sake, this is the 21st century and hunting with hounds belongs in a bygone age and those that condone it are, IMHO, born without any compassion or humility towards other sentient creatures.
I’m a big believer in “do unto others as you would have done unto you” – so you pro hunt people – if you had to choose a way to die, would you prefer a quick, death by a trained marksman or would you like to run and run and run for miles with no where to hide until you give up exhausted and are ripped to pieces by a pack of dogs being cheered on by a merciless bunch of inhumane creatures?
I really cannot understand how anyone with an ounce of sentiment in their body can say that hunting and animal to death with hounds and horses is humane or acceptable.
And as for your argument that kids are there to enjoy the ride – I suggest you start researching pro hunters and see how many young kids say it’s fun – they enjoy the thrill of the chase and the kill. One young girl even had pictures posted on her Facebook gloating as a deer was about to be killed and saying how she enjoyed it enormously! The little kiddy hunters of today are the bloodlust adults of tomorrow.
24 February, 2010 at 7:45 am #432380not natural for dogs to hunt ???………..of corse it is why do you think jack russles are used for ratting ?……why do you think certain dogs are used in badger baiting ? ……attack dogs used in the armed forces?……..even a sniffer dog to a degree is hunting !……….they may not always attack or kill but all dogs are capable of hunting the only thing that stops them is the relationship they have with there owner.
24 February, 2010 at 8:17 am #432381@pete wrote:
@thin ice wrote:
@pete wrote:
quality pete top quality
the thrill of the hunt captured for all to see
might go on saturday morn now my appetite has been wetis that supposed to be sarcastic ? If wit was shit you’d be constipated. You also might want to look up Democracy
wondered how long it would be before you got vulgar pete
24 February, 2010 at 9:34 am #432382@panda12 wrote:
Poli
You think fox hunting kills the old and infim – natural selection?
yes it does
Read up on “cubbing” poli – find out what that involves and how the hunt members circle round a wooded area known to contain fox cubs as young as a few months old. The hounds are sent in to kill them and the cubs have no chance of escape as the hunt followers drive and frighten them back into the wooded area by banging their saddles and shouting.
i dont need to read up on cubbing i have been cubbing and i dont like it nor have i once advocated it, but that is cubbing not fox hunting its two entirely different things
You think it still doesn’t happen post ban? Read the Horse and Hound hunt forum.And you think digging out a fox that has gone to ground and chucking it to the hounds alive to be ripped apart is controlling the old and infirm? Natural selection is it? Smacks of sheer bloodlust to me.
i think if you have read my posts you will see that i also dont agree with this part of hunting
It’s deplorable and sick and like cubbing and hunting in general, is no “sport” at all.And you really want to find out about deer and stag hunting. Is it really necessary to chase an animal like a deer or stag across miles of countryside to then shoot it? Why not just shoot it on sight and forget about the chase?
i went stag hunting once and dont really want to find out about it , no, i merely said i dontknow enough about it to comment on itThe overriding factor about hunting with hounds is – it is all down to blood lust. The hunt followers want the thrill of the chase followed by the death. There is no other justification for them wanting the ban repealed. It has nothing to do with conservation at all.
i agree that applies to some yes, but not all and yes it does help the conservation of a fox and indeed the countryside as a whole
If animal numbers need to be controlled then use trained, paid marksmen who can do it with a clean, quick and humane kill with a quota on finding the old and infirm and diseased without all the bloodlust and socialising involved in hunting with hounds. And ban farmers and any other gun toting idiot from roaming the countryside looking to shoot anything that moves.
i am all for a trained marksman that can guarantee a clean shot and death of the old and infirm, how you go about this i would love to know, because no one has managed it yet, whereas a hunt virtually ensures this unless a very unlucky fox gets suprised which is exceptionally rareFor God’s sake, this is the 21st century and hunting with hounds belongs in a bygone age and those that condone it are, IMHO, born without any compassion or humility towards other sentient creatures.
I’m a big believer in “do unto others as you would have done unto you” – so you pro hunt people – if you had to choose a way to die, would you prefer a quick, death by a trained marksman or would you like to run and run and run for miles with no where to hide until you give up exhausted and are ripped to pieces by a pack of dogs being cheered on by a merciless bunch of inhumane creatures?
Anyone that has infact been hunting will know that most deaths of a fox doesnt involve running and running for miles the runs that are for miles tend to be the young foxes who merely run a while lose the hounds the hounds re pick up the scent and so on the fox is way in front of the hounds and as i have stated have even been seen hunting their own prey mid chase, the runs that end in death usually being the old or infirm last no time at all, generally speaking that is, of course there is always the odd exception.
I really cannot understand how anyone with an ounce of sentiment in their body can say that hunting and animal to death with hounds and horses is humane or acceptable.
And as for your argument that kids are there to enjoy the ride – I suggest you start researching pro hunters and see how many young kids say it’s fun – they enjoy the thrill of the chase and the kill. One young girl even had pictures posted on her Facebook gloating as a deer was about to be killed and saying how she enjoyed it enormously! The little kiddy hunters of today are the bloodlust adults of tomorrow.
Just cos one girl enjoys the blood lust doesnt mean they all do, infact alot are there JUST for the ride, of that i know its not a stat or a guess i dont need to research them i have in the past and still do speak to them often, i was one of them! so its not just a random guess .24 February, 2010 at 9:41 am #432383@peggy wrote:
not natural for dogs to hunt ???………..of corse it is why do you think jack russles are used for ratting ?……why do you think certain dogs are used in badger baiting ? ……attack dogs used in the armed forces?……..even a sniffer dog to a degree is hunting !……….they may not always attack or kill but all dogs are capable of hunting the only thing that stops them is the relationship they have with there owner.
Ypu are right peggy, a domestic pet dog a working dog a show dog all evolved from the wild dog who hunt to survive, it is as natural for a dog to hunt as it is for us to eat and breath, even before jobs for dogs whether it be hunting hounds or sniffer dogs and the likes they needed to hunt to survive its totally natural. I dont think they were saying it wasnt natural for adog to hunt :? i’m sure they must know this is not the case, everyone knows that surely. Little old flo down the road pet poodle would hunt if it meant their survival and they werent given a bowl of food everyday.
24 February, 2010 at 10:45 am #432384Then lets legalise dog fighting cause guess what it’s natural for pitbulls to fight. Any foxes are killed because they are foxes and not because they are problem foxes, whatever method is used the fox is killed because it is there and it has to lose it’s life because it just might eat something we dont want it to eat
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!