-
Posts
-
Ive said it before but i shall say it once more:
The can NOT be called refugees UNTIL they are screened.
The attacks on Paris last Friday confirmed that some of the terrorists were in fact let into Europe via Greece by posing as refugees.
Before they get to Main Europe and the rest I agree with France and i say bomb them. ISIS does not want us to bomb them, they want us to give up and surrender.
Its a hard pill to swallow but to kill a few to save millions is the option i’m up for. If i was one of the thousands of woman and children who are still been slaved into rape victims i too would wish death on my captures even if that meant i too would be killed, at least i would not be tortured any more.
THIS IS WORLD WAR 3. France has declared war, others are lining up behind them in support. Countries bombing Countries is war, the more Countries that get involved makes it a World War.
Its time for boots on the ground. Drop some SAS units in and light up the targets with the laser so bomb dropped by the plan hits what its meant to. SEND IN THE BOYS!!!!
Bloody Hell!! :lol: :lol: :lol:
Someone keep them away from the nuclear button
They were talking about that on radio 2 today. Nuking is not the answer.
and how are boots on the ground the answer?
The Brits alone could defeat ISIS within hours, maybe minutes. ISIS will just withdraw after killing a few – and then the real war would begin.
I’m not a pacifist and I want ISIS eliminated, but just throwing bombs and troops at them is playing right into their hands.
Syria has beomce a pig’s sh*thouse, and you want to send troops there, bomb more?
Look at Iraq. Saddam defeated within hours; Bush proclaimed complete victory a few months after the war started. Massacre and chaos followed – and that was in a stable state.
Within hours of Jihadi John being killed, Obama said that ISIS was now being contained. This was hours before the Paris attack. He described ISIS as ‘junior varsity’ in 2014 bef9ore they captured key towns in Iraq.
If someone can come up wiht a coherent strategy for destroying ISIS, I’ll listen carefully. Otherwise, you’re playing the ISIS game. Let’s see if one emerges, but none has so far.
It’s very very easy to get into a war in that region; more and more difficult to stop the war turning very nasty and endless, wiht more civilian casualties there and here. It’s not a Nintendo game.
How about a coffee evening when we invite them round for a little chat and serve bourbons
or all meet in Dabiq and see what happens
Ok sceps. Lets all sit back and watch the Russians bombing anything and everything and saying it was a lagit target. Even our mp’s are looking at it again ( well ever one expect Jeremy Corbyn ) as hes so far to the left he has no balls for a fight Its time to play the seek locate destroy game.
the lights are on, but nobody’s at home with you lot, hey?
You see somebody crapping in the street, so you want to go and crap on top of theirs??
If you can stop ISIS bombing here, I’ll think about what you’re saying.
But you just call for more death and misery, adding yet more sides to a six-sided war. and then expect they won’t inflict it on you.
You advocate bombing, soldiers, death, destruction without any thought about the effects – playing thhe IS game like real suckers.
There are ways of defeating IS, but talking of who’s got the biggest balls in town is the mark of the air-head.
Here’s the guy with the biggest balls in town –
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!