-
Posts
-
@coathanger wrote:
:lol:
Not attacking, just batting one back for the good guys ( in my humble opinion only)
Far be it from Scrotehanger to attack Jen its merely humour & dare I say it Banter.
But pleased you noticed it too.@jen_jen wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
And I just love the bull shytes that said they were on board HMS Sheffield and lived to tell the tale without any burns.
Out of 281 crew 20 died and 26 were injured. That leaves 235 uninjured who lived to tell the tale without any burns. Fancy walking into a room full of them and telling them they’re bullshitters?
You mis-interpret me. I have had the misfortune of talking to two men who both claimed to have been on board the Sheffield. One it transpired couldn’t have been because he would have been 14 at the time.
The other? Well let’s just say he didn’t even know the name of the flagship that led the task force in which he allegedly sailed…
I’ve corrected my typo, just for Coathanger, as it seems to have upset her so much. :D
And yes, I am slightly dyselxic and you are quite right, I should have used my spell checker. But seeing as it riled you so much, I’m glad I didn’t. :lol:
@panda12 wrote:
I’ve corrected my typo, just for Coathanger, as it seems to have upset her so much. :D
And yes, I am slightly dyselxic and you are quite right, I should have used my spell checker. But seeing as it riled you so much, I’m glad I didn’t. :lol:
I’ve also added the typo mishap on the Regrets thread, because I deeply regret it and I suspect it’s something that is going to take me a while to get over.
A logical conclusion based on information presented is not misinterpretation.
@jen_jen wrote:
A logical conclusion based on information presented is not misinterpretation.
It is your logical conclusion and you are entitled it. Just as I am entitled to clarify what I originally wrote.
@A.Groanup wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
A logical conclusion based on information presented is not misinterpretation.
It is your logical conclusion and you are entitled it. Just as I am entitled to clarify what I originally wrote.
It’s commonly known as backtracking :lol:
*wonders what I have ever done to A.Groanup that warrants him following me about the boards. :P
@panda12 wrote:
@A.Groanup wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
A logical conclusion based on information presented is not misinterpretation.
It is your logical conclusion and you are entitled it. Just as I am entitled to clarify what I originally wrote.
It’s commonly known as backtracking :lol:
*wonders what I have ever done to A.Groanup that warrants him following me about the boards. :P
Don’t flatter yourself, I was merely following all the posts :roll:
@A.Groanup wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@A.Groanup wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
A logical conclusion based on information presented is not misinterpretation.
It is your logical conclusion and you are entitled it. Just as I am entitled to clarify what I originally wrote.
It’s commonly known as backtracking :lol:
*wonders what I have ever done to A.Groanup that warrants him following me about the boards. :P
Don’t flatter yourself, I was merely following all the posts :roll:
Of course you were! :P
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!