-
Posts
-
..lol…if kubrik can do it……… :wink:
Apart from the alien aspect, Icke comes up with some very interesting associations between world leaders and their habits, in particular the royals in this country who he tells are full blooded ` shape shifters `….. The idea that these people have controlled this country for so long by hereditary association says it all to me….. Again, the one thing which interests me mainly, is the power these people have over their `subjects`…. Should you ever be invited to attend a royal to-do, would you bow or courtsey to these people… :?: Of course, when i say invited, i dont mean a summons to attend the circus commonly known as `The courts of justice `……would you :?:
Theres a hint of truth maybe I shape shifted when i stopped smoking though i should just go on a diet i guess
As for bowing and curtseying it’s merely tradition not compulsory, officers in the forces get called sir does that mean they’re better than the ranks ?
Well you could have done what clinton done and just not inhaled…. :lol:
You just have to visit the courts to see the absolute pomp and show these people put on, not to mention the pathetic dress code…..The farce of knighthood is yet another perversity acted out in a fashion not unlike the sunday sermon of the faithful who bow down to the `creator` in his house of worship…. Many titles can be purchased by people now, this in some perverted way, shows me that this country is far from being a classless society, that being so, little wonder the youth of today are way off track….what message does this send out, i really cannot accept the ways of these people, Icke trys to reveal how these royals and the like are `inbred`…i cant deny i do consider this mans research to be more than fiction, again, the power these people wield over this country no doubt will never be truly known to the public..
Hi Pete ! x
lol @ the shapeshifting ! :D
posted this before i know but….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytX_BvqWk2Q
it goes so well with your dancin chicken !
@gazlan wrote:
Well you could have done what clinton done and just not inhaled…. :lol:
You just have to visit the courts to see the absolute pomp and show these people put on, not to mention the pathetic dress code…..The farce of knighthood is yet another perversity acted out in a fashion not unlike the sunday sermon of the faithful who bow down to the `creator` in his house of worship…. Many titles can be purchased by people now, this in some perverted way, shows me that this country is far from being a classless society, that being so, little wonder the youth of today are way off track….what message does this send out, i really cannot accept the ways of these people, Icke trys to reveal how these royals and the like are `inbred`…i cant deny i do consider this mans research to be more than fiction, again, the power these people wield over this country no doubt will never be truly known to the public..
It’s far less class ridden than it used to be and the royals have no power whatsoever. I also dont know what the hell anyone is worried about over knighthood… means nothing just a title
and hello Pepsi x
@pete wrote:
So the theoretical realm without the slightest of proof is ok ? Can i throw in the multi dimensional quark shift theory, or any other theory i wish to imagine. And one instance of travelling to the moon does not make a lot of science fiction fact.
Well Pete, I only actually said that both theories were “possibilities”. I didnt actually champion their cause or anything, I just said possibilities. :?
Tbh Pete, Im not totally against a God as a creator. I’ve just not seen any evidence of it. I just dont really understand what the concept of a God would be.
I dont believe it would be the nosy busybody God of the major religions who gives us a load of laws and commandments to follow, and who sends us to hell if we dont beleive in him even though he’s all loving, but I could accept some sort of being who is simply more advanced than us.
We’ll probably create universes no different to our own in the future whether on a computer screen or in a laboratory. That would probably make us Gods, so the term really has to be defined.Tks Wil. Im waiting for Pete’s comments on the afoementioned though.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!