Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Do you smoke cause the packet is pretty
-
AuthorPosts
-
31 January, 2010 at 7:58 pm #14349
Tobacco firms could be forced to sell cigarettes in plain packets
Tobacco firms are set to be forced to sell cigarettes in plain, unbranded packets as the next step in the war on smoking.
If the ban comes in the Department of Health would be likely to outlaw the use of logos, colours and graphics on packets and require cigarettes to be sold in plain packs with just the text of the brand of cigarettes.
The tobacco industry admits that plain packaging would have a drastic effect on profits and do enormous damage to cigarette makers.
A ban on branding and logos on packets in England could see smokers abandoning well-known brands such as Marlboro and Silk Cut, which cost around £6 a pack, and switch to cheaper options.
Experts say the move could strip cigarettes of what remains of their glamorous image and help reduce the numbers of young people taking up the habit.
Removing brand marketing on packs and having a requirement for ‘plain packaging’ on all tobacco products would increase the effectiveness of health warnings and reduce misconceptions about the relative risks of different brands which terms like ‘smooth’ perpetuate.
“All cigarettes prematurely kill lifelong smokers regardless of make or brand. So we need to look closely at the evidence on the links between packaging and consumption.
“And we’re encouraging research to further our understanding, especially when it comes to children and young people. We’ll also seek views on the legal implications of any restrictions on packaging for intellectual property rights and freedom of trade.”
I’m sorry but i just dont see this at all people smoke a brand because it’s the brand they like not the colour or message on the packet surely
31 January, 2010 at 8:03 pm #430409I guess the only people who will care are the people who are addicted to cancer sticks, and the companies who make vast fortunes out of their nicotine habit.
31 January, 2010 at 8:04 pm #430410I cant see how a plain packet with Benson and Hedges printed on it is going to be less profitable than a gold coloured packet
31 January, 2010 at 8:07 pm #430411Ask the companies who spend millions on branding and image.
31 January, 2010 at 8:07 pm #430412I smoke (though I plan to quit soon) and I smoke tobacco rather than cigarettes, smoke a certain brand mainly based on price, never packaging or advertising, so I don`t really get it either.
31 January, 2010 at 8:08 pm #430413@minim wrote:
Ask the companies who spend millions on branding and image.
Now they can spend nothing and make even bigger profits
31 January, 2010 at 8:09 pm #430414P.S. Having said that I do choose a popular brand rather than an unknown cheaper version, so I guess it must work on some levels
31 January, 2010 at 8:14 pm #430415you choose what you usually smoke, this might work with new smokers or will the tobacco companies just save on branding costs and sell their cigarettes cheaper
31 January, 2010 at 8:19 pm #430416I don’t know the ins and outs of marketing…. but when so much money is spent on branding and advertising, you have to assme that companies do it because it works. Without any branding at all companies may well decide that the product is no longer sustainable and stop making them. Less brands to choose from will push pricing up as the competition is less. My guess is that cigarettes will become more expensive, not less.
31 January, 2010 at 8:24 pm #430417I think it`s a great idea by the way, I hate smoking, and I will quit, and anything to discourage anyone taking up this habit is worth doing.
We all know the dangers, and I think if the health warnings are made more visible it may deter people from starting, it`s a hell of a lot easier to prevent someone starting than quitting I think.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!