Viewing 10 posts - 101 through 110 (of 123 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #353461

    @pats wrote:

    @cymorill wrote:

    Hmph at message board regs :evil: :wink: … Snogs pats, and slaps fasty :P :lol:

    bring it onnnnnnnn woman…………. :P :P

    Only if you show me yer vest =P~

    I have a smote alarm pete, so it will be useless on me. :P

    #353462

    @panacea wrote:

    I don’t know any of you but as an observer so to speak it seems to me that ukpilot whoever he/she may be has cetainly rattled a few cages. Never smoke without a fire seems to be apt in this scenario.

    I wonder how many of you have actually met this person for you to be so adamant about his actions both on and off this site ???

    I for one never judge a book by its cover nor do I listen to someone who seems to spend every waking moment on an internet chat site. May I suggest you all seek counselling and get a fuking life, Pete you seems to be the saddest fuker of them all so perhaps you’d like to go first. :-({|=
    The rest of you will no doubt follow as this seems to be your normal way of doing things, no doubt I too will join the ranks of ukpilot, vampyre, peebles, sarah, mibs, etc etc till something else comes along to stimulate your single celled brains.

    well first lets do away with the formalities ay panacea , welcome to the boards……

    hmmmm fer a newbie you certainly had a good go ‘weighing up the natives’ good plan…………. except……..you dont know the history unfortuately. ‘alledgedly’ uk pilot has been found out for seeing or flirting with several of the jc women at one time, so , to cast off his cloud of unpopularity he has now come out attacking….. I do believe someone once said attack is the best form of defence?

    now as a newbie you have obviously scoured the boards in an effort to find out whether or not you would like it here, well, im sure you will, unless, you go attacking established members on your very first post, a sure fire way to get on the wrong side of people?

    However, you do seem literate and able to string more than one sentence together so theres a plus i suppose. :roll: :roll:

    #353463

    @pete wrote:

    I am PB i shall smote thee :twisted:

    I’ve seen his smoter..and it’s a whopper..believe me! :twisted:

    #353464

    Were talking Errol Flynn :shock:

    #353465

    @esmeralda wrote:

    @pete wrote:

    I am PB i shall smote thee :twisted:

    I’ve seen his smoter..and it’s a whopper..believe me! :twisted:

    trollop :shock:

    #353466

    @cath 55 wrote:

    @panacea wrote:

    I don’t know any of you but as an observer so to speak it seems to me that ukpilot whoever he/she may be has cetainly rattled a few cages. Never smoke without a fire seems to be apt in this scenario.

    I wonder how many of you have actually met this person for you to be so adamant about his actions both on and off this site ???

    I for one never judge a book by its cover nor do I listen to someone who seems to spend every waking moment on an internet chat site. May I suggest you all seek counselling and get a fuking life, Pete you seems to be the saddest fuker of them all so perhaps you’d like to go first. :-({|=
    The rest of you will no doubt follow as this seems to be your normal way of doing things, no doubt I too will join the ranks of ukpilot, vampyre, peebles, sarah, mibs, etc etc till something else comes along to stimulate your single celled brains.

    well first lets do away with the formalities ay panacea , welcome to the boards……

    hmmmm fer a newbie you certainly had a good go ‘weighing up the natives’ good plan…………. except……..you dont know the history unfortuately. ‘alledgedly’ uk pilot has been found out for seeing or flirting with several of the jc women at one time, so , to cast off his cloud of unpopularity he has now come out attacking….. I do believe someone once said attack is the best form of defence?

    now as a newbie you have obviously scoured the boards in an effort to find out whether or not you would like it here, well, im sure you will, unless, you go attacking established members on your very first post, a sure fire way to get on the wrong side of people?

    However, you do seem literate and able to string more than one sentence together so theres a plus i suppose. :roll: :roll:

    :lol:

    #353467

    and also calls her peebles like someone else :?

    #353468

    @pats wrote:

    @cath 55 wrote:

    @panacea wrote:

    I don’t know any of you but as an observer so to speak it seems to me that ukpilot whoever he/she may be has cetainly rattled a few cages. Never smoke without a fire seems to be apt in this scenario.

    I wonder how many of you have actually met this person for you to be so adamant about his actions both on and off this site ???

    I for one never judge a book by its cover nor do I listen to someone who seems to spend every waking moment on an internet chat site. May I suggest you all seek counselling and get a fuking life, Pete you seems to be the saddest fuker of them all so perhaps you’d like to go first. :-({|=
    The rest of you will no doubt follow as this seems to be your normal way of doing things, no doubt I too will join the ranks of ukpilot, vampyre, peebles, sarah, mibs, etc etc till something else comes along to stimulate your single celled brains.

    well first lets do away with the formalities ay panacea , welcome to the boards……

    hmmmm fer a newbie you certainly had a good go ‘weighing up the natives’ good plan…………. except……..you dont know the history unfortuately. ‘alledgedly’ uk pilot has been found out for seeing or flirting with several of the jc women at one time, so , to cast off his cloud of unpopularity he has now come out attacking….. I do believe someone once said attack is the best form of defence?

    now as a newbie you have obviously scoured the boards in an effort to find out whether or not you would like it here, well, im sure you will, unless, you go attacking established members on your very first post, a sure fire way to get on the wrong side of people?

    However, you do seem literate and able to string more than one sentence together so theres a plus i suppose. :roll: :roll:

    :lol:

    Wow!! that was brilliant Cath 8)

    #353469

    @prettypink wrote:

    @pats wrote:

    @cath 55 wrote:

    @panacea wrote:

    I don’t know any of you but as an observer so to speak it seems to me that ukpilot whoever he/she may be has cetainly rattled a few cages. Never smoke without a fire seems to be apt in this scenario.

    I wonder how many of you have actually met this person for you to be so adamant about his actions both on and off this site ???

    I for one never judge a book by its cover nor do I listen to someone who seems to spend every waking moment on an internet chat site. May I suggest you all seek counselling and get a fuking life, Pete you seems to be the saddest fuker of them all so perhaps you’d like to go first. :-({|=
    The rest of you will no doubt follow as this seems to be your normal way of doing things, no doubt I too will join the ranks of ukpilot, vampyre, peebles, sarah, mibs, etc etc till something else comes along to stimulate your single celled brains.

    well first lets do away with the formalities ay panacea , welcome to the boards……

    hmmmm fer a newbie you certainly had a good go ‘weighing up the natives’ good plan…………. except……..you dont know the history unfortuately. ‘alledgedly’ uk pilot has been found out for seeing or flirting with several of the jc women at one time, so , to cast off his cloud of unpopularity he has now come out attacking….. I do believe someone once said attack is the best form of defence?

    now as a newbie you have obviously scoured the boards in an effort to find out whether or not you would like it here, well, im sure you will, unless, you go attacking established members on your very first post, a sure fire way to get on the wrong side of people?

    However, you do seem literate and able to string more than one sentence together so theres a plus i suppose. :roll: :roll:

    :lol:

    Wow!! that was brilliant Cath 8)

    One does have standards pink , it is both polite and customary to welcome our new members to the boards.

    I think sloppy behaviour and manners should now be outlawed and added to the list of Just Chat we will not tolerate etc., etc. :wink:

    #353470

    i’m tellin pete caff. [-(

Viewing 10 posts - 101 through 110 (of 123 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!