-
Posts
-
actually, it’s too late to scrub that comment.
I now wish that I hadn’t written it.
Rudeboy’s comments werenot just uninteresting to me, but they promised to lead on to more uninteresting stuff, and I don’t want to get caught in a morass of goo and irrelelvance while he exercises jokes whihc are only funny when compared to mister q’s short christmas cracker style humour.
so..I’m bored with the line of reasoning. Pretend I didn’t answer, and you can go around claiming a major interlechual victory, yeah?
Rock on, Tommay.
Interesting that it takes you forever and a day to respond to a post but when responding quickly this is the level of intelligence displayed… you’re a pretentious fraud quite clearly.
well, if so, a bored pretentious fraud.
I mean..
check it out..
I point to Dostoevsky’s The Possessed and the Stavrogin story about abuse, and it’s turned into the fact that I’m a pervert.
When I ask you, you tell me that you haven’t actually read Dostoevsky’s The Possessed.
I am being condemned for being a pervert by someone who hasn’t even read the evidence.
When I point out that the passage isn’t perverted at all, but that the girl screams chillingly I have killed my God, and that this expersses Dstoevsky’s Christian ethic, I have my faith ridiculed as similar to Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck.
To this philistinism of the first order, it’s added that I’ve been chasing the bottoms of Mooosey and Mizzy, you’ve seen it!!
Check this out, rudeboy.
This is a pervert…courtesy of the immortal Robert Crumb..a book produced by the expensive art house publishing company, Taschen. You can buy it on Amazon if you’re interested, rudeboy (I think, I’ve not actually checked it out)
Sceptical you state the reason you act differently on here to women is ” you prefer the company of women”. This isn’t a dating site sceptical, if you want to fawn over women maybe match.com or the equivalent would be more suitable instead of driving women away with your sleazy and at times patronising terminology. I prefer women as a heterosexual but treat both genders equally on a messageboard instead of this fairly sickly approach you often take when a woman pops up. Ultimately women see it as desperate and don’t like to be spoken down to which is why most of them steer clear of you on here.
My point on religion being like Disney stands, if you are going to quote the bible, I’ll start reciting Cinderella or snow white – what’s the difference ? As stated I dont believe you are necessarily a pervert , just a lonely character looking to impress women which is fine but it’s clearly not working so a change in tact is probably needed where you don’t imply women who barely know you are long lost loves that you help through ” dark times ” etc
How did this get from a disucssion of a poem about abuse to an expression of abuse?
Dostoevesky’s novel is an expressin of Christian ehtics. How come you put Dostoevsky on a level wiht Mickey mouse and Donald Duck?
You ought to read more serious literature.
I don’t worry about whther a novel is Christian or not. I’m just concerned that it’s nteresting in some way.
Graham Greene’s script for The Third Man is an expression of his Catholic faith. A first rate movie, too. Would you refuse to watch it because it’s Catholic?
All this girly talk and cissy men/nancy boys who prefer the company of women must really make rudeboy sick.
If someone prefers the company of men, I don”t mind, actually. They’re not going to get any brickbats from me.
For a lot of guys, a woman is there to serve in the kitchen and in bed, and they then go down to the pub for talk with real men, men who throw up in their beer if they see two guys kissing.
These real men prefer sitting around the campfire together, singing in the Scout Jamboree, or maybe singing the Horst Wessell. Real men, who don’t think of women’s things and perversion, but think of comradeship and struggle.
For Fighting Were They Born.
When the government banned these real guys from wearing brown shirts back in 1926, they showed what they thought of tyranny and cissies, and continued to show that they were still going to parade and train.
Huzza!!!
All this girly talk and cissy men/nancy boys who prefer the company of women must really make rudeboy sick.
If someone prefers the company of men, I don”t mind, actually. They’re not going to get any brickbats from me.
For a lot of guys, a woman is there to serve in the kitchen and in bed, and they then go down to the pub for talk with real men, men who throw up in their beer if they see two guys kissing.
These real men prefer sitting around the campfire together, singing in the Scout Jamboree, or maybe singing the Horst Wessell. Real men, who don’t think of women’s things and perversion, but think of comradeship and struggle.
For Fighting Were They Born.
When the government banned these real guys from wearing brown shirts back in 1926, they showed what they thought of tyranny and cissies, and continued to show that they were still going to parade and train.
Huzza!!!
Iv’e not said anywhere ” I prefer the company of men” , I’m just not like you a sleazy elderly bore that panders to women on here. It’s mildly amusing though the women you claim to be ” great friends ” find you creepy , lecherous and want to avoid you lol. “Real men ” as you put it talk to women as equals not as some object of sexual desire on an internet messageboard typing x after x . There isn’t a woman on here who is interested in you scep – move on
Well, that’s certainly true of Mooosey, and I’ve accepted it. Don’t think it’s because of anythng other than politics?
This isn’t a dating site, rudeboy. I come on here to discuss and argue, with women as well as men. I rarely visit the chatroom, boy.
You claim you want intelligent discussion, yet you come on ehre continually throwing round insults and abuse as though they’re going out of fashion.
You claim that I’m a lecherous pervert because I read Dostoevsky on this site, It turns out you have never read Dostoevsky, and so your ability to argue about Dostoevsky’s Chrisitan ethic is reduced to your own cultural level of arguing about Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse.
Grow up, and read a better class of literature, boy.
Well, that’s certainly true of Mooosey, and I’ve accepted it. Don’t think it’s because of anythng other than politics?
This isn’t a dating site, rudeboy. I come on here to discuss and argue, with women as well as men. I rarely visit the chatroom, boy.
You claim you want intelligent discussion, yet you come on ehre continually throwing round insults and abuse as though they’re going out of fashion.
You claim that I’m a lecherous pervert because I read Dostoevsky on this site, It turns out you have never read Dostoevsky, and so your ability to argue about Dostoevsky’s Chrisitan ethic is reduced to your own cultural level of arguing about Donald Duck and Mickey Mouse.
Grow up, and read a better class of literature, boy.
No I claim you are what you are, a lecherous geriatric with a very limited brain attempting to extrapolate parallels between irrelevant things with very little perspective on anything and a creepy manner which turns womens stomachs.
Clear enough?
What is clear is that for all your talk of seeking intelligent conversation, you can’t conduct it.
I know of some people from an anti-fascist organisation in the North (still going after all these years) who spend all their time calling the fascists and Tommy Robinson supporters, ‘pedos’, and getting called ‘pedos’ by the Tommy Robinson people and fascists. “You dirty pedos”. “We’re not the pedos, You’re the pedos”.
And they actually take these insults seriously. They meet onceaother occasionally and smack the hell out of the opposing ‘pedos’.
You think I’m going to get involved in that game of abuse and counter-abuse.
I write about dexy’s poem ehre, and point to Dostoevsky. Your response. I’m a pedo and have bizarre tastes like bestiality.
I try to get it back on track, and you talk of Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck.
I oppose the death penalty, and to you I become a ‘nancy boy’.
I hardly ever go in chat, and then only so that I don’t lose touch with the odd individual, and I become a lecherous geriatric who turns women’s stomachs.
What are you on?
You’re not going to drive me out, boy. If things get heavy in this country this autumn and winter, I’m not going to let some character whose politics seem to derive from der Sturmer foul up discussion.
What is clear is that for all your talk of seeking intelligent conversation, you can’t conduct it.
I know of some people from an anti-fascist organisation in the North (still going after all these years) who spend all their time calling the fascists and Tommy Robinson supporters, ‘pedos’, and getting called ‘pedos’ by the Tommy Robinson people and fascists. “You dirty pedos”. “We’re not the pedos, You’re the pedos”.
Why do you keep wittering on about Tommy Robinson and paedos ? Tommy Robinson was highlighting a gang of muslims charged and convicted of abusing prepubescent girls and good for him. What has that got to do with this thread exactly? I’ve already stated I don’t believe you are a paedophile, just a fairly seedy, lonely old guy unable to answer direct questions lapsing into tales of the ” far right ” again as it’s all your brain can cope with.
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!