Boards Index › General discussion › Off topic chat › Crystal Meths or not?
-
AuthorPosts
-
13 September, 2008 at 11:01 am #370722
@pikey wrote:
Esmeralda. No, sorry, George Best. Pints are fine.
You lost any moral high-ground you assumed to occupy when you posted this. I’m sick in body, but YOU are sick in the head.
13 September, 2008 at 11:03 am #370723Have you been ill, then? You should’ve mentioned. I was referring to the facial hair.
13 September, 2008 at 11:06 am #370724Pete, have you actually got a point??
You’re doing what you always do, making an ill thought out comment, and then when someone picks you up on it, spend the next 20 pages arguing that you didnt say it / didnt mean it that way. Maybe you should think before you type in future and make your point perfectly clear, instead of rambling on like a lunatic.
What a selfish, heartless man you’ve shown yourself to be…I’d say thats your “caring pete” image right out of the window now, wouldnt you?
..and what exactly is sick about Pikey showing a picture of George Best at his lowest ebb, on a thread where people are discussing addiction? You said he called you names…he didnt. You said he lost the argument, he didnt…you did when you started telling him to f.uck off because you didnt like his point of view.
13 September, 2008 at 11:06 am #370725@esmeralda wrote:
@pikey wrote:
Esmeralda. No, sorry, George Best. Pints are fine.
You lost any moral high-ground you assumed to occupy when you posted this. I’m sick in body, but YOU are sick in the head.
13 September, 2008 at 11:09 am #370726Pourquoi?
13 September, 2008 at 11:09 am #370727@pats wrote:
ok i have read most of this thread. i’m interested in the rich an famous bit…..so can anyone tell me which catogory..peaches geldof falls into????…….already at the tender age of 18 she has run away and got married…..been splashed all over the tabloids buying drugs ect.
does she have inner demons caused by her parents splitting up when she was 11??her mother running off with micheal hutchence and the overdosing on heroin and killing herself at 42.
or is she another spoiled brat brought up by a rich daddy…had everything handed to her on a plate and despite being kept mostly out of the limelight by her strict straight talking father bob…has inevitably gone down the road of .it cant happen to me???
i abhor drugs .always have.made no pretence of the fact when me and smiley went head to head a long time ago on a similiar thread.
but i’m also a hypocrite….i refer to drugs as spliffs…coke.heroin…e/s….uppers.downers…an anything else people swallow sniff or inject to make their night out go with more of a buzz.
yet……………i smoke…..and i drink.
i dont think i drink enough to end up like george best…..but i’m certainly in line for lung cancer or any other cancer caused by nicotene.
spose i’ll have to sit firmly on the fence on this one althho i have found this thread facinating. in one corner the people defending individuals who are addicted by choice……ordinary everyday people who we know.
and the people defending the rich and famous who know exactly what they are doing.
so back to peaches…..how many 18 yr olds have £150 to go to a dealer and think nothing of it except a rollicking from daddy when he opens the news of the world…..or the kid next door who will pinch his mums catalogue money…..rob the old lady down the road on her way back from the post office……..go theiving to order….
whos to blame?????Pat’s this is all true, you say you you could never drink to excess usch as George best, who knows, nobody knows, if you were to do it regular enough your body would crave it, alcoholism is a mental and physical craving.
I will sympathise with any form of addict, I still drink and smoke, I can’t be a bigot, I know how easy it is to become addicted and I feel for those that try to stop but they haven’t got the will or the way, this is my only arguement. Narrow minded people are a form of addict themselves, they won’t let their minds open to others misfortunes and be sympathetic.
13 September, 2008 at 11:10 am #370728@~Pebbles~ wrote:
Pete, have you actually got a point??
You’re doing what you always do, making an ill thought out comment, and then when someone picks you up on it, spend the next 20 pages arguing that you didnt say it / didnt mean it that way. Maybe you should think before you type in future and make your point perfectly clear, instead of rambling on like a lunatic.
What a selfish, heartless man you’ve shown yourself to be…I’d say thats your “caring pete” image right out of the window now, wouldnt you?
..and what exactly is sick about Pikey showing a picture of George Best at his lowest ebb, on a thread where people are discussing addiction? You said he called you names…he didnt. You said he lost the argument, he didnt…you did when you started telling him to f.uck off because you didnt like his point of view.
you didnt see the Esmarelda bit no ? Dont read between my lines theres nothing to read i have sympathy for the causes of addiction not the addiction itself if you dont like it i suggest you return your costume to millets and get a refund instead of wasting your time posting cause i care not a jot for your opinion
13 September, 2008 at 11:12 am #370729@pete wrote:
@*Sian wrote:
@pete wrote:
@*Sian wrote:
@pete wrote:
Of course they’re less of a person Sian they got themselves in that position and now they expect what ? tolerance and sympathy ? As for talent thats a personal thing i dont think she is but if enough people like her stuff then she must be at least to them
So you are saying I am less of a person because i became a drug addict?
im saying you became less of a person while you were, you were hurting yourself and to some degree hurting others probably but your not now, you did something about it and should be commended for that but not sympathised with when you were an addict
I meant this Pete, you said i was less of a person for becoming a drug addict, to be commended for coming off them, good bad or indifferent, people deserve some form of sympathy. I never realised I’d become an addict, I didn’t set out to be one, my friend and I both used to be weekenders, I became addicted, she didn’t, so I am a lesser person than she is because she didn’t become an addict… I just wish you’d open your eyes, this world isn’t all black and white.
You became less of a person than you were drugs alcohol do that, i never said you became a bad person now did i, or that you or anyone else were worse in comparison to another, never intimated you set out to be an addict no one does. Dont read between lines theres not always anything to read and i know it aint black and white some people are driven some just become thats shades isnt it ?
And I told you that I still had a loving caring nature, still held down a job and paid my bills, why am I a lesser person?
13 September, 2008 at 11:18 am #370730@*Sian wrote:
@pats wrote:
ok i have read most of this thread. i’m interested in the rich an famous bit…..so can anyone tell me which catogory..peaches geldof falls into????…….already at the tender age of 18 she has run away and got married…..been splashed all over the tabloids buying drugs ect.
does she have inner demons caused by her parents splitting up when she was 11??her mother running off with micheal hutchence and the overdosing on heroin and killing herself at 42.
or is she another spoiled brat brought up by a rich daddy…had everything handed to her on a plate and despite being kept mostly out of the limelight by her strict straight talking father bob…has inevitably gone down the road of .it cant happen to me???
i abhor drugs .always have.made no pretence of the fact when me and smiley went head to head a long time ago on a similiar thread.
but i’m also a hypocrite….i refer to drugs as spliffs…coke.heroin…e/s….uppers.downers…an anything else people swallow sniff or inject to make their night out go with more of a buzz.
yet……………i smoke…..and i drink.
i dont think i drink enough to end up like george best…..but i’m certainly in line for lung cancer or any other cancer caused by nicotene.
spose i’ll have to sit firmly on the fence on this one althho i have found this thread facinating. in one corner the people defending individuals who are addicted by choice……ordinary everyday people who we know.
and the people defending the rich and famous who know exactly what they are doing.
so back to peaches…..how many 18 yr olds have £150 to go to a dealer and think nothing of it except a rollicking from daddy when he opens the news of the world…..or the kid next door who will pinch his mums catalogue money…..rob the old lady down the road on her way back from the post office……..go theiving to order….
whos to blame?????Pat’s this is all true, you say you you could never drink to excess usch as George best, who knows, nobody knows, if you were to do it regular enough your body would crave it, alcoholism is a mental and physical craving.
I will sympathise with and form of addict, I still drink and smoke, I can’t be a bigot, I know how easy it is to become addicted and I feel for those that try to stop but they haven’t got the will or the way, this is my only arguement. Narrow minded people are a form of addict themselves, they won’t let their minds open to others misfortunes and be sympathetic.
in which case can i please have a huge awwwwww cause i smoked (i chose not to go to school one day and spent it at a smokers house poor tortured me) and after shiting myself cause i thought i was gonna die i stopped and i want a cigarette every day every single day and guess what… i chose to smoke, me, no one else so if anyone is sympathetic then ram it cause it’s my fault. Help and sympathy dont need to go hand in hand they want help they should have help
13 September, 2008 at 11:22 am #370731@*Sian wrote:
@pats wrote:
ok i have read most of this thread. i’m interested in the rich an famous bit…..so can anyone tell me which catogory..peaches geldof falls into????…….already at the tender age of 18 she has run away and got married…..been splashed all over the tabloids buying drugs ect.
does she have inner demons caused by her parents splitting up when she was 11??her mother running off with micheal hutchence and the overdosing on heroin and killing herself at 42.
or is she another spoiled brat brought up by a rich daddy…had everything handed to her on a plate and despite being kept mostly out of the limelight by her strict straight talking father bob…has inevitably gone down the road of .it cant happen to me???
i abhor drugs .always have.made no pretence of the fact when me and smiley went head to head a long time ago on a similiar thread.
but i’m also a hypocrite….i refer to drugs as spliffs…coke.heroin…e/s….uppers.downers…an anything else people swallow sniff or inject to make their night out go with more of a buzz.
yet……………i smoke…..and i drink.
i dont think i drink enough to end up like george best…..but i’m certainly in line for lung cancer or any other cancer caused by nicotene.
spose i’ll have to sit firmly on the fence on this one althho i have found this thread facinating. in one corner the people defending individuals who are addicted by choice……ordinary everyday people who we know.
and the people defending the rich and famous who know exactly what they are doing.
so back to peaches…..how many 18 yr olds have £150 to go to a dealer and think nothing of it except a rollicking from daddy when he opens the news of the world…..or the kid next door who will pinch his mums catalogue money…..rob the old lady down the road on her way back from the post office……..go theiving to order….
whos to blame?????Pat’s this is all true, you say you you could never drink to excess usch as George best, who knows, nobody knows, if you were to do it regular enough your body would crave it, alcoholism is a mental and physical craving.
I will sympathise with and form of addict, I still drink and smoke, I can’t be a bigot, I know how easy it is to become addicted and I feel for those that try to stop but they haven’t got the will or the way, this is my only arguement. Narrow minded people are a form of addict themselves, they won’t let their minds open to others misfortunes and be sympathetic.
i get what your sayin sian. i’m just trying to see it from both sides. a former addict will have sympathy for an addict……having been there got the t shirt. like i said i’m a hypocrite.i drink.i smoke.yet when i see people swallowing pills..sniffing charlie.ect..just to get that extra buzz i cant understand why.
when i go out the drink .music and company is enough……i dont need to do the rest. and yes.that last fag b4 i fall into bed….an that first one in a morning is probably doing me just as much harm.
its the people who BRAG ABOUT THEIR HABIT THAT FOOK ME RIGHT OFF.
yeh………u ad a buzzin night.u sniffed a few lines.swallowed sum e/s….well bully fa u.
i dont go around sayin oh wat a buzz i smoked 20 fags today an had 5 cans of lager……..aint i a right rebel. lol.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!