Could medication be used for paedophilia?

@sweetass wrote:

I’m not sure who you’re trying to patronise Uber.. But it’s a poor attempt at justifying the behaviour of paedophile ….. I wonder if you and other pc friendly sympathetics would be so understanding if you or someone you loved was (God forbid) ever attacked :?: :?:
There is NO justification for creatures such as these…. I am clever enough to know that what has been ‘ingrained’ can be taken away …. A normal feeling human being is aware of what is right and wrong… for you to TRY and justify the actions of paedophiles concerns ME. I am a parent and if my child was sexually abused by a paedophile. You can guarantee I would not rest until I’d cut off the filthy barstuds bollix and stuffed them in his throat .. in the case of it being a female ?? I’d wash her cervix with acid.
I am a parent and I’m a bloody good one .. anyone who would harm my child OR any child for that matter, is not now nor EVER going to get sympathy from me …
Do you consider the act of sexual abuse to a child an act of a person who is ill :?: I’m fugged if I do or ever would.
My children are my life and part of my role as a parent is to nurture the good in them. To encourage morals and the basic knowledge of right and wrong.
Jeffery Dahmer nor Denis Neilson were sexually abused as children .
Peadophiles and deviants such as these are this way through choice. They found no other way to get their kicks. So the abuse and eventual murder of innocents.. whatever their sexuality was down to the fact that they.. like peadophiles enjoy the power they have over thei victims.
Get a grip Uber.. stop trying to pyschoanalyse shyte that you think you might know about .. but obviously don’t
This is about the very simple fact of right and wrong.. Paedophiles know they’re doing wrong .. yet they ‘can’t help themselves’ cos daddy was a bad man, mummy didnt love them enough or uncle freddy from bromley touched them when they were little

THERE IS NO EXCUSE AND PPL LIKE YOU WHO TRY TO OFFER ANY ARE AS BAD IF NOT WORSE THAN THE SCUM WHO PERPRETRATE THESE APPALLING ACTS
Makes me sick to my stomach :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

Ps show me a society that condones paedophillia :?: :?:

And I’m not even sure if youre lost and posting on the wrong thread, coz yet again you seem to be responding to posts that havent been posted and countering points that havent been raised

As a side point the actual format of a discussion is person A says something, person B then reads what was written and replies to it

Whereas you seem to think that person B is supposed to totally ignore whats been written and instead respond to what they would have preferred to have been written so they can type predictable tabloid mindless cliché ridden tripe bereft of any relevance but fraught with emotive illogic in the hopes nobody will either notice or point out they are actually responding to things that havent actually been said :shock:

Hardly the same now is it lol :lol: :lol:

Firstly I’d suggest looking up the word “justify” as you dont seem to be able to grasp what it actually means, theres (to cognitive people) a massive difference between understanding something and “justifying” it, although morons cant seem to tell the difference between the two, but trust me there IS one nonetheless

As discussions also tend to flow far better when people actually back up their eroneous linkages would you care to point out exactly where either myself or DOA have “justified” paedo behaviour? Take your time, theres no rush lol

Its also quite laughable that you called me “PC”, do you even know what sort of views “PC” idiots have?, infact not wanting to figure out why people do something, infact not questioning things, blindly following doctrine, wanting to hang the people your told its ok to hang and not wanting to scrutinise the ones youre told its not ok to scrutinise is what being PC is

So on an issue like this, rape and other cases NOT discussing the intricacies of the act, NOT wanting to try and meticulously figure out the variances, details and driving factors is being PC

Wanting to assume all of each group is exactly as claimed in tabloids and just hang em IS being PC

Being nonsensically emotive and incapable of rational discussion IS being PC

So to see someone who is PC on this matter you might want to find a mirror chick :wink:

As for the rather daily tabloid wheeling out of “right and wrong” lol, right and wrong has little meaning in the arena of sexual gratification, desire and taboos

Taboos for one dont exist with “right” things, fidelity isnt “right”, to many people who partake in things like gang bangs, S&M, dogging and countless other sexual pursuits the fact they are considered “wrong” is a large part of why they do it in the first place, and thats men AND woman

All of which is conveniently and moronically overlooked and ignored when a topic like this is wheeled out as it clouds the oversimplified dumbed down definition the masses are capable of absorbing

History is full of peoples sexual desires being practiced irrespective of whether they were socially deemed “right” or even if they were illegal, infact adultery is practised in many countries where the penalty is death, yet even that doesnt act as a deterrant or discourage people partaking in that socially, morally and legally “wrong” sexual pursuit, yet its whimsically claimed that with other sexual pursuits that should somehow be “different” and the mere knowledge of other people viewing it as wrong should be that? LOL, on what planet is that exactly? Coz it sure aint this one :lol: :lol:

Sodomy/buggery, bestiality, infidelity, sex outside marriage, homosexuality and many other sexual pursuits HAVE throughout time been carried out by men and women in abundance whether morally frowned upon, specifically religiously banned, legally banned and even when punished by banishment, death or imprisonment

Yet paedos, you seem to think ought to be the only subset of society that might actually pay heed to any of those dissaprovals and desist??? Why?

And also where all of those other examples of sexual preferences not being acceptable are concerned, for every person that does actually still partake in them there are people who will want to but will be discouraged from doing so. I dont think for one second that wont also be the case with paedophillia. SOME people will act on the urge, some wont

Probably in similar proportions to the percentages of gay and straight people that do or dont act on their urges when society or the law frowns on them really I’d expect

And just to clear something up, a compulsion is something done when the person themselves considers it totally wrong but does it anyway. Its not a compulsion when they are simply aware that other people define it as wrong but they dont, which is often the case with paedos, animal fakkers, cheats, pain junkies, subs and the like

In their own minds they have a different view even if that view is born out of their own unique way of rationalising things, but even the sane people twist reality to suit the version they want to exist, that is also common to pretty much every person who has ever lived as ALL perspective is unique and therefore flawed

STILL hazy after all these beers !

@sweetass wrote:

You’re not worth arguing with Uber . You backtrack and change your opinions like a chameleon changes its colours . I , at least am consistent in my views . :roll: :twisted: :?

As you’ve elected quite predictably to not back up your eroneous claims of “justifying” paedophiles with any actual evidence of same I guess it would be just as pointless asking you to show “contradiction” too eh lol :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

And thats probably why youre posts are emotive and as a result lacking in any form of logical reasoning then if youre “argueing”, isnt this a discussion or debate board rather than an “arguement” board or hissy fit one? haha :lol:

@sweetass wrote:

@waspish wrote:

Hat off to you uber hook line and sinker… :lol: :lol: :lol:
sorry girls but that made fun reading [mabey cos im stoned :wink: ]
i actually see both sides as i worked with paedos for years. i tried reason, cause and effect and medical castration. none of wich work. after many years of listening to their pathetic excuses . I personally think they should be shot in the back of the head.

I’m beginning to have those same thoughts about Uber :wink: :wink: :P

:shock: :shock: :shock: :o

When I asked if there was anychance of “head” and a “bang” that WASNT what I meant silly :P :P :P :P