Boards Index › General discussion › Getting serious › Could medication be used for paedophilia?
-
AuthorPosts
-
25 September, 2007 at 11:29 am #288649
You’re all bloody nuts!
In the past they tried all kinds of ways to stop “homosexuals” being “homosexuals”.
These included drugs, psychiatric, electricity and operations treatments.
Clearly they all worked………..
It’s about time we all face the truth about this subject. You can’t change persons sexually.
There no medical answers to this problem.
25 September, 2007 at 11:48 am #288650@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
You’re all bloody nuts!
In the past they tried all kinds of ways to stop “homosexuals” being “homosexuals”.
These included drugs, psychiatric, electricity and operations treatments.
Clearly they all worked………..
It’s about time we all face the truth about this subject. You can’t change persons sexually.
There no medical answers to this problem.
Yup, have to agree there totally
Topics like this are viewed with a near lack of common sense even by many alleged “profesionals”
Just because their sexuality isnt “normal” its assumed to be a totally different thing TO “sexuality” and is tried to be explained away as illness, evil, mental problems etc etc
Realistically tho its merely a sexual variant nothing more, the same as someone developing a foot fetish, or one for slime collector sniffing and millions of other “variants” that arent boring vanilla sexual practices
Yes in many cases it COULD “possibly” be traced back to what the exact fascination was caused by, or what traumatic events, dissassociations or affectations were the seed that the sexual obsession grew from
But as is the case with many sexual variations they are very often childhood occurences that will be so deep rooted in the persons mind and that will have permeated so much of their consciousness that came afterwards they will be unchangeable
A bit like making a foundation one degree off level, then perfectly building a huge block of flats on top of it, no matter how much you try to fix the top five stories you cant remove the influence of incline generated by the initial construction as all else was built on top of it. Thats why a childs formative values and realisations are far more pivotal than what comes afterwards, because all future realisation is affected by or tainted by them as they are the earliest and therefore most reinforced dendrites formed in the brain which then become permanent data paths and new layers of brain tissue form over them as the brain grows
So, obviously in my opinion, the only real solution is permanent incarceration, endless sexual drive suppressing drugs, castration for men, and lord knows what you’d do to women or capital “curing”
You have I reckon, as much chance of “curing” a paedo as you do a homosexuals sexuality or as much chance of convincing a straight sexually prolific man that tits and fannies arent sexual
But until people consider paedophilia more as an actual sexuality or “kink” and respond to it accordingly rather than as some “illness” or dysfunction of a different type the solutions will be just as missguided and inneffective
25 September, 2007 at 12:23 pm #288651
So, obviously in my opinion, the only real solution is permanent incarceration, endless sexual drive suppressing drugs, castration for men, and lord knows what you’d do to women or capital “curing”You have I reckon, as much chance of “curing” a paedo as you do a homosexuals sexuality or as much chance of convincing a straight sexually prolific man that tits and fannies arent sexual
But until people consider paedophilia more as an actual sexuality or “kink” and respond to it accordingly rather than as some “illness” or dysfunction of a different type the solutions will be just as missguided and inneffective
I agree with you that short of cutting their nads off with a bolt cutter, (my suggestion) permenant incarceration etc is the only solution.
I don,t agree with paedophilia being a persons sexuality or a “kink”. It IS an illness, or a sickness if you,d prefer. To be a paedophile you HAVE to be sick, sick in the head. Thinking of children in a sexual way is SICK, end of story. The solution to female paedophiles has to be the same. Permenant incarceration and drugs. Once a paedophile is locked up they should STAY locked up. The only way out should be in a box.25 September, 2007 at 1:03 pm #288652I do wish you people would learn something about the subject before you start “cutting things off”
Paedophiles like the innocents of a child, the control of the child.
The sexual act is only a small part of it.
Once a child has lost their innocents most paedophiles lose all interests in the child and kill them for that reason. Killing of the witness always helps too.
Family members or people who work with children are the long-term abusers and often keep the abuse going until the child is 16. (Normally there is some kind of relationship between the child and the abuser.)
You’re all mad if you think doctors can remove this problem.
The only thing you can do is removed them from socially, but prisons only serve has a “meeting point” for information.
We need a better solution.
25 September, 2007 at 1:13 pm #288653Doa were you dropped on your head at birth? How the hell can you say the sexual act is only a small part of it!! ffs. Paedophiles should be kept in solitary confinement in places like Rampton until they die. They shouldn,t be allowed to “meet” with other humans because paeophiles arn,t human. Whats, this “better solution” then doa? Medical castration and solitary confinement for the rest of their miserable existence is the only thing we can do. If I had my way they,d all be gassed.
25 September, 2007 at 1:37 pm #288654First you have to look at the numbers first.
There are less than 200 paedophiles in our prison system of 85,000 inmates.
They’re not that common.
There are not thousands of paedophiles walking the streets preying on young children.
I can only think of 4 cases of “paedophiles” in the last 10 years.
They’re no way of stopping a random attack. We all know that.
We need a way to spotting the victims of long-term abuse.
I know its not nice, but a screening program for children starting at 4 years would be a step forward. Lets do something about those victims of physical abuse has well has sexual.
And has for the paedophiles we do catch, lets not keep them all in the same box. Keep them part and keep them too busy to think.
But we all know there no money for this.
Either we all start spending some money on our prison system and looking how we are dealing with our prisoners or keep putting up with the fear of “paedophiles”.
25 September, 2007 at 1:50 pm #288655@bat wrote:
So, obviously in my opinion, the only real solution is permanent incarceration, endless sexual drive suppressing drugs, castration for men, and lord knows what you’d do to women or capital “curing”You have I reckon, as much chance of “curing” a paedo as you do a homosexuals sexuality or as much chance of convincing a straight sexually prolific man that tits and fannies arent sexual
But until people consider paedophilia more as an actual sexuality or “kink” and respond to it accordingly rather than as some “illness” or dysfunction of a different type the solutions will be just as missguided and inneffective
I agree with you that short of cutting their nads off with a bolt cutter, (my suggestion) permenant incarceration etc is the only solution.
I don,t agree with paedophilia being a persons sexuality or a “kink”. It IS an illness, or a sickness if you,d prefer. To be a paedophile you HAVE to be sick, sick in the head. Thinking of children in a sexual way is SICK, end of story. The solution to female paedophiles has to be the same. Permenant incarceration and drugs. Once a paedophile is locked up they should STAY locked up. The only way out should be in a box.And thats the exact same kind of brainwashed dumbed down nonsensical drivel thats the problem
Just HOW exactly is a person being a paedo “different” to someone shagging sheep? Or wanting whip someone or be whipped? Or a woman wanting to be tied up and gang banged by complete strangers?
Dressing it up as an “illness” is subjective convenient ludicrousness at its finest as ANY of those things and many other sexual deviances could just as easily be claimed to be the result of an “illness” simply because the people who would label it as such wouldnt be turned on by it and therefore cant comprehend why anyone “sane” would be. And the chances are a lot of what they DO get upto in the bedroom would be seen in the exact same way by someone even more close minded than they are. Infact there are many people who think someone must be mentally ill just to want to have oral sex, yet to 99% + of society its a pretty mundane everyday part of sex
Infact to some people having sex at all when you dont want to actually procreate is seen as a “sickness” and a sign someone is mentally lacking in someway
Peoples subjective and mostly brainwashed knee jerk reactions to things arent “science”, and many things are seen as subjectively “sick” that arent in any medical sense a symptom of a “sickness” in any true sense of the word
But as with things like homosexuality and beastiality they are often labelled as being a “sickness” but thats more of a clever way of using language to demonise and alienate certain groups within a society and isnt just limited to being used on such specific fields as this but is pretty much applied to anything one person does that another doesnt like or agree with
What makes one any more “sick” or “perverted” than any of the others?
Its no different to all religious people claiming all non believers MUST be “sick” based on their own faith and the non believers lack of faith and non believers claiming you would need to be sick in the head to believe in imaginary people and the hokus pokus of religion based on their beliefs
One sides belief that the other is mentally deficient doesnt make that a reality, and nor does one persons sexual deviance however minor or major being disliked by someone else actually make their view that person has an “illness” correct
For that to be the case the left wingers would first have to accept that plain old vanilla hetrosexual sex for the mere purpose of procreation WAS the “norm” to be able to first define a baseline on which to class other things as being “sick” or a sickness, in lieu of that we simply have an immensely diverse facets to peoples sexuality
25 September, 2007 at 1:55 pm #288656@bat wrote:
Doa were you dropped on your head at birth? How the hell can you say the sexual act is only a small part of it!! ffs. Paedophiles should be kept in solitary confinement in places like Rampton until they die. They shouldn,t be allowed to “meet” with other humans because paeophiles arn,t human. Whats, this “better solution” then doa? Medical castration and solitary confinement for the rest of their miserable existence is the only thing we can do. If I had my way they,d all be gassed.
How the hell can you say it isnt?
Have you ever actually had sex?
Do you have any concept of obsession, passion or eroticism?
Very few acts of sex are “mainly” about the sex, most are actually about eroticism of one form or another whether thats a feeling of power, powerlessness, innocence, filth, wholesomeness, violation, abandon, temptation, sating, taboo, pleasure, pain, torment, tantalisation, gaining of control, giving up control and many other things as well as combinations of the mental stimulations
Infact hardly ANY sexual act is mainly about the sex, unless its two brain dead retards screwing without actually comprehending what it is theyre doing
Pavlov would be soooooo proud seeing most peoples trained responses on topics such as this lol :lol:
25 September, 2007 at 2:48 pm #288657Pavlov would be soooooo proud seeing most peoples trained responses on topics such as this lol
*Rings the bell and starts salivating* oh goody, dinners ready! :wink:
25 September, 2007 at 2:57 pm #288658Ubermik ffs we arn,t talking about obsession or eroticism, we are talking about adults, who should know better, having sex with children!! To even contemplate the idea, you HAVE to be SICK IN THE HEAD. It isn,t normal to want much less consider, sex with children. Adults who do are such things therefore are seriously mentally ill, ie SICK and need chemical castration and solitary incarceration for the rest of their miserable pathetic existence. When a British government has the balls to bring back the death penalty, I,ll happily gas the sick bastards, and I tell you something else too. I,d PISS myself laughing whilst I did it and hope they suffered……….a LOT.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!