Conspiracy Theories

@themaster wrote:

@tom wrote:

Either another mindless sheep brainwashed into believing what the political elite tell him to believe, or just a troll not worth bothering with.

Anybody who says the “new world order” doesn’t exist are clearly delusional and incredibly and childishly naive. The EU, Euro, World Bank, World Court, EU court, EU president, EU army, the up-and-coming Amero and the NAU, international financial “democracy” and the political elite’s push for globalisation and less libertarianism etc would dispute otherwise, as there is clearly a move towards unified international governments, gradually fusing into one over time.

No doubt the troll (and/or childishly naive puppet) will post “huh? There’s no such thing as the EU, globalisation, increased state control or a world financial bank!”

And where’s the proof? No? OK then, back to your delusions. :)

http://europa.eu/index_en.htm

http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/index.php

http://ec.europa.eu/euro/index_en.html

http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/cover121406.htm

http://www.stopthenorthamericanunion.com/

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/

http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/0,,contentMDK:20040558~menuPK:34559~pagePK:34542~piPK:36600,00.html

Wow look at that, all those non-existent organisations having paid officials, presidents and even official websites.

As I said, a childishly naive peasant dangling from strings.

I shan’t reply to you any further – it really is no fun talking to an empty vessel.

Anybody here who does still have a free mind?

Dutch Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko Dies In Car Crash

by Debbie Menon / My Catbird Seat

The accident of prominent Dutch “demolition expert” Danny Jowenko is of special interest to us, because on July 13th 2011 in an exclusive Press TV interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Veterans Today Board member and editor, specifically drew attention to the Dutch demolition expert, Danny Jowenko, stating that two years ago, he came across an extremely disturbing video in which Danny Jowenko was interviewed concerning the collapse on 9/11, of a 3rd World Trade Center building. WTC7, a 47 storey building, the third tallest building, which was not hit by a plane, which was conspicuously missing in the 9/11 commission report and which according to Danny Jowenko was absolutely brought down by a controlled demolition. “That is, WTC-7 went straight down into its own footprint in seconds without any visible external trauma, which means only some catastrophic internal trauma could have brought it down, concluded Sabrosky.” He has repeatedly cited the well known demolition experts’ views and interview in his recent articles and interviews.
READ ALL ABOUT IT

As we all obsess with the forthcoming inquiry into the press, the inquiry into something slightly worse than hacked telephones – the deaths of 150,000 people in Iraq – continues to produce startling revelations.

Today it published the redacted testimony of a senior MI6 officer who stated that “there were from the outset concerns” in the intelligence service about “the extent to which the intelligence could support some of the judgments that were being made” in Tony Blair’s famous WMD dossier.

Note those words: from the outset. This directly contradicts the testimony of Sir Richard Dearlove, then head of MI6, and John Scarlett, then chair of the joint intelligence committee, to Hutton.

To my mind, it is even more damning than the quote that’s making news today: the officer describing Alastair Campbell as an “unguided missile” about whom MI6 had “concerns.” (What those concerns exactly were has been helpfully blacked-out from the published testimony.) “We suffered from his propensity to have rushes of blood to the head,” the officer says.

“There was very substantial pressure [from Downing Street] to generate new intelligence,” said the spook. “We were, in all honesty, not well placed to do that…. Some of the newer material was, so to speak, being torn off the teleprinter and rushed across to Number 10 with, shall we say, a little more haste than was probably appropriate…

“The pressure to generate results, I fear, did lead to the cutting of corners…We were probably too eager to please.”

This adds to the disclosure by the great Chris Ames in the Observer two weeks ago of a memo in which John Scarlett, Campbell’s co-conspirator in sexing up the dossier, talked about “obscuring the fact that, in terms of WMD, Iraq is not that exceptional.”

And in May, Michael Laurie, former senior intelligence official, said: “We knew at the time that the purpose of the dossier was precisely to make a case for war rather than setting out the available intelligence.”

It is becoming even clearer than it was before that my story about the sexing up of the dossier was true. And it is becoming ever harder for Chilcot to perform a whitewash. But the fact that all this is only coming out now – nine years, and four official inquiries, after the dossier – demonstrates the failure of official inquries, and the success of journalism, at getting to the truth. Let’s hope the judge in charge of the latest inquiry into the press realises that, shall we?

source

Is this in the right thread ?

This is another controlled attack on a fundamental threat to national security {USA}. . .
In the land of the free – home of the brave, they consume what they are told to consume or else! What’s on your agenda? I mean menu? Watch the raid on http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=D26E2CE9C7B0E0690977F89688E6D713