Boards Index › General discussion › Off topic chat › Communism Has Hit JC
-
AuthorPosts
-
16 October, 2006 at 9:32 am #244654
@esmeralda wrote:
so as Pat says..who is the user throwing insults at admin?
And you tell ME who the favoured few are PB..I’m not on the receiving end of the complaints..that’s YOUR job. Not being privy to your private messages..I therefore couldn’t possibly know who HASN’t complained. Maybe EVERYONE has issued a private written kicking..in which case I expect ’em ALL to be deleted at some point. You obviously have an issue with ME..and if you wish to parry with this childish debate ad nauseum..feel free..after all..you’ve maybe got nowt better to do?
OK Esmerelda so I take it that you don’t have a list of the ”favoured few” that you are suggesting get some sort of special treatment from JustChat Staff. So how about you ease back on the allegations – like the one quoted below.. OK?
@esmeralda wrote:
“…… Hell..let’s have a free for all..or rather.a free for the favoured few.
16 October, 2006 at 9:44 am #244655Feeling hurt PB..bewildered at unfounded allegations? Well then you know something of what I went through . And if I HAVE caused any unfounded hurt then I am sorry for it..because I would never knowingly want anyone to be genuinely distressed. As for your insistence on naming a ‘favoured few’..my previous answer still stands… If you believe I am being unjust..then prove me otherwise..and I will be happy to stand corrected.
16 October, 2006 at 9:49 am #244656By the way: The word was Conciliation..NOT reconciliation.
Conciliation : To win over from hostility
Reconciliation : To restore friendship after estrangement
16 October, 2006 at 9:51 am #244657@geoff wrote:
Nothing has to be proved to you or anyone, otherwise I may suggest you prove you’re a new user… you see, anyone can say whatever they like on here, and regularly do. And to require proof is pretty ridiculous.
I guess that pretty much summarises it Esmerelda – couldn’t have put it better myself.
16 October, 2006 at 9:52 am #244658You already DID try to get me to prove I was a new user Geoff. And yes..that was bl@@dy ridiculous.
16 October, 2006 at 9:56 am #244659Good to see the tag-team back in action. You just can’t help yourselves can you….
16 October, 2006 at 9:58 am #244660For someone who doesn’t take himself seriously…that was quite a self-pitying diatribe you posted earlier Geoff.
16 October, 2006 at 10:06 am #244661For me example 2 wrote:
well excuse me PB! you cannot deny that geoff as got away with murder on these boards! an u can bluster all ye like.everyone who has the guts to say so knows it!. he only has himself to blame for the insults he gets.and he knows it!……..why you feel the need to continuiously defend him is beyond the comprehension of most of us. no one as beliitled……insulted and dragged peoples names through the mud more than geoff. forgotton his continious atacks on *pervy pete* have we? or selective memory again? does geoff have proof that pete is a perv? no.its just mud slinging!. what i think esmerelda and fast are TRYING to say is..let people retaliate if they feel the need.dont just delete the threads and posts that are aimed at particular people. geoff made a post this morning..people replied.it was deleted..why? u like to think u treat people with irony at times.a little sarcasm……i see it as downright ignorance at times. ur funny PB….but u aint THAT funny.
was that a direct atack on u geoff? if your honest…….u will admit none of it is lies mate.16 October, 2006 at 11:34 am #244662i’m not jumping on any bandwagon geoff. just puting my point of view across as i see it. u have said urself…u enjoy the mudslinging.i havnt defended anyone either.if anything my post was aimed at PB……..the old fa/rt (Thank you for that !!! Bloody ageist !!! ….Ed) :lol: like i said to rainy..we have got along the past few weeks…..and as rainy pointed out.we have had numerous digs at each other in the past….but thats where it as stayed. i remember i think making a post a while back when peeved mentioned the cam thing……..saying something along the lines of.ffsnot that old chestnut. maybe people read me completely wrong from the posts i make….i have never ever recieved a pm telling me to stay away from u.i have never sent a pm….and i aint part of a clique either. i WAS called an idiot in msn however for avin a laugh on the boards with you. that person and i still chat on the boards but they are no longer in my msn. i do not like being told who i can and cannot chat too!. at the end of the day i read the posts same as everyone else and draw my own conclusions. whether that be agreeing with you.or someone else.none of us are whiter than white. i stand by the fact however that you have made quite a few degoraty(spellcheck) posts…we all have!. PB stated posts made directly at another user to cause trouble would be deleted…….and i still stand by the fact that yours havnt been deleted as quickly as other peoples.
no one is picking on you as far as i can see just replying with their own take on things regarding the things you have said. and your perfectly right.pete was equally as bad as you.i should have stated that in my post.i apologise.but like i say.my post wasnt aimed at u.it was for PB.16 October, 2006 at 12:28 pm #244663I wish you lot would slow down. I cant keep up lol.
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!