Boards Index › Chat rooms – the forum communities › Chat forum three boards › Cliques and Cliches
-
AuthorPosts
-
17 June, 2012 at 7:14 pm #499101
Don’t we all belong to groups in some way or another whether by default or by consciously joining a group?
I mean we all belong to the JC Commune. :wink:
17 June, 2012 at 7:16 pm #499102a clique although a group is people that exclude others though, and i’m never keen on that, groups of like minded people fine but not with the exclusion of anyone else showing an interest
17 June, 2012 at 7:31 pm #499103@(f)politics? wrote:
a clique although a group is people that exclude others though, and i’m never keen on that, groups of like minded people fine but not with the exclusion of anyone else showing an interest
I see what you mean but I think we all belong to groups whether we intend to or not and exclude people whether we intend to or not.
I can think of the time I lived in a village. I was excluded on many fronts by the locals, even those who thought this was wrong were powerless to do anything.
17 June, 2012 at 7:48 pm #499104Panda you said don’t we all belong to groups etc then say you were excluded and others were powerless to do anything abt it, which says in its self cliques aren’t nice, i don’t like cliques but at the same time i also don’t think any person is powerless to do anything abt such exclusions, too many people fear their own exclusions from including people others won’t. Each and everyone us can do something about it if we really wanted to put ourselves on the line for others, sadly not many people do. Self preservation some may say, weak and gutless in my opinion.
17 June, 2012 at 8:06 pm #499105@(f)politics? wrote:
Panda you said don’t we all belong to groups etc then say you were excluded and others were powerless to do anything abt it, which says in its self cliques aren’t nice, i don’t like cliques but at the same time i also don’t think any person is powerless to do anything abt such exclusions, too many people fear their own exclusions from including people others won’t. Each and everyone us can do something about it if we really wanted to put ourselves on the line for others, sadly not many people do. Self preservation some may say, weak and gutless in my opinion.
I agree with you but your attitude towards cliques on the Gay Marriage thread is somewhat different – you said you “So better they (gay ppl) concentrate on their chosen faith, and each other than worry abt changing the churches views.”
:?
17 June, 2012 at 8:36 pm #499106doesnt mean i would exclude them far from it, i have friends who are gay i have no problems with them at all, i just dont see why the need for so much pc change of many cultural things that make cultures what they are, inclusion is fine but no need to change what is, intergration should be inclusion into what is not changing what is to suit, im sure ur exclusion wasnt done on religious grounds or traditions more likely bigots ?
17 June, 2012 at 8:49 pm #499107@(f)politics? wrote:
doesnt mean i would exclude them far from it, i have friends who are gay i have no problems with them at all, i just dont see why the need for so much pc change of many cultural things that make cultures what they are, inclusion is fine but no need to change what is, intergration should be inclusion into what is not changing what is to suit, im sure ur exclusion wasnt done on religious grounds or traditions more likely bigots ?
Sorry but maintaining the status quo for the sake of it is not healthy. Attitudes over time change. One generation may well have different views from another so should we maintain the status quo just out of a nostalgic hankering for the past?
My exclusion from the village I lived in was down to pure prejudice on many fronts, race, wealth, the fact I wasn’t born in the village. I gave up trying to integrate, I wasn’t out to change anything but to fit into what was already there.
17 June, 2012 at 8:50 pm #499108There are distinct groups of hooligans that roam the boards at night looking for victims, but your safe if you stay in packs :D
17 June, 2012 at 9:03 pm #499109@panda12 wrote:
Sorry but maintaining the status quo for the sake of it is not healthy. Attitudes over time change. One generation may well have different views from another so should we maintain the status quo just out of a nostalgic hankering for the past?
My exclusion from the village I lived in was down to pure prejudice on many fronts, race, wealth, the fact I wasn’t born in the village. I gave up trying to integrate, I wasn’t out to change anything but to fit into what was already there.
I think old fashioned views and traditions are sorely missing in many ways yes, the days of men holding a door being offensive to a woman for example was a downward slide, and if thats what moving forward with the modern thinking is all about, it doesnt appeal to me. That said i agree we need to tweak and alter things slightly too, but not uproot everything just to suit a few. Why shouldnt we maintain old values and cultures?
As for your integration i wasnt saying u were trying to change anything, i was merely saying that we shouldnt have to change things, but to include people what ever their sexuality or race into our society is right and proper, every single person has the right to be included, just not at the expense of changing many long held traditions. There has to be a stop button somewhere, or who are we ? what is a christian ? what is a muslim ? what is a buddhist ? And i certainly can’t see other faiths being so free or being as pressured to change their ideals so why should the christian church of england bow down to this pressure ? Far better to spend the time and effort on loving god and each other than trying to fight the church. If people genuinely feel god has no issues with homosexuality then they can continue to worship him from within, which is where it should come from. Faith is far greater than human inclusions.17 June, 2012 at 11:20 pm #499110@(f)politics? wrote:
. . . . . There has to be a stop button somewhere, or who are we ? what is a christian ? what is a muslim ? what is a buddhist ? And i certainly can’t see other faiths being so free or being as pressured to change their ideals so why should the christian church of england bow down to this pressure ? Far better to spend the time and effort on loving god and each other than trying to fight the church. If people genuinely feel god has no issues with homosexuality then they can continue to worship him from within, which is where it should come from. Faith is far greater than human inclusions.
Why should there be a stop button? why shouldn’t society continue to evolve and – hopefully – become more fair more equal and iron out the mistakes made on the way. (opening doors for women was never generally regarded as offensive. Although once a guy says he only holds a door open for a woman so he can check out her rear, it’s never again quite as gallant as it might have seemed . . . . .
As Jen has said the church of England will not be forced to marry same sex couples against its will any more than any other religion. Having said that, no other faith is the established church of the country , with the sovereign as head and church leaders in the house of lords able to directly influence how the law of the land is shaped. So there is actually a good reason why the church should be made to be fairer in some respects. However despite fears that a challenge in Europe would result in the churches being forced to change, this has not happened over other issues like divorce or gender. Any changes there have come from within, even though legal challenge was possible.[/i]
-
AuthorPosts
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!