-
Posts
-
QUOTE FROM UBER “That a non perverted hetrosexual realises that people want to watch kids being molested and THAT “makes” them become a paedo? Well no “excuse” as such, on that I agree, but I also would wonder how many people who are for whatever reason turned on by this kind of stuff can get all the kicks they require from such files meaning they wont then actively add to the amount of people actually physically molesting? “END QUOTE
First of all, any one who likes watching kids being molested CANT be described as “non perverted” and as for people getting kicks out of it??? how you can sit there and defend them is beyond me.
waits for the next mind numbing installment from uber pri ck zzzz
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
QUOTE FROM UBER “That a non perverted hetrosexual realises that people want to watch kids being molested and THAT “makes” them become a paedo? Well no “excuse” as such, on that I agree, but I also would wonder how many people who are for whatever reason turned on by this kind of stuff can get all the kicks they require from such files meaning they wont then actively add to the amount of people actually physically molesting? “END QUOTE
First of all, any one who likes watching kids being molested CANT be described as “non perverted” and as for people getting kicks out of it??? how you can sit there and defend them is beyond me.
Ok hands up, you have now totally confused me
Either you really are a very very stupid person with a very poor graspa da ainglaise or youre just a halfwit who thinks they are super clever
Do you really think that selectively cutting out part of a paragraph so the entire tone of the excert is altered is SOOOO devilishly clever that it will magically whoosh right over the heads of anyone reading it?
Or do you just not grasp the construct of paragraphs and sentences and think each it a totally enclosed separate entity with no relationship to the ones pre or proceeding them?
Try reading the WHOLE think INCLUDING the first sentence you very conveniently and accidentally (yeah right lol) ommitted to copy first time round and see if you can get any closer to actually understanding what WAS said rather than as I have already pointed out “what you WANTED to have been said”
“
Do you REALLY think that a paedophile is created merely because theres a demand for viewing such tripe? That a non perverted hetrosexual realises that people want to watch kids being molested and THAT “makes” them become a paedo? Do you?
“There ya go, save your poor ickle fingers having to click all the way back lol
Sort of a nice touch clouding it by adding a response to a totally different bit of your post in the form of “Well no “excuse” as such, on that I agree, but I also would wonder how many people who are for whatever reason turned on by this kind of stuff can get all the kicks they require from such files meaning they wont then actively add to the amount of people actually physically molesting?” but still far too obvious to trick anyone lol
The thing with a quote is that unless you quote what was said as a complete block its not really a quote at all lol, its a cut and shut ringer that doesnt quote the person but is a sentence of your own construction designed to say what you want to have been said rather than showing what was actually said IN context
Fail your GCSE english did ya by any chance?
oh do shut up you boring old man…people see you for what you are, a sad perverted (and most likely bald) old man, they dont need me to point it out for them
Typicaly psycopath… great work there uber. :wink: Turn the problem on the complainer.
You really are clever. Loads of words. Lots of bullshi/t. Somewhere in there is a bit of sense. But you dont really care do you?
What university did you go to? I must write to them and congratulate them. Did you get a 2:2?
I think the in word for you at the mo is a “flamer”. :lol:
Bored with you now.
between this post and the other deleted maddie one, i think weve all worked out that Uber is a sad pathetic man who finds it amusing to make jokes and “smart” comments about child abuse. Hes a joke.
@sharongooner wrote:
Typicaly psycopath… great work there uber. :wink: Turn the problem on the complainer.
You really are clever. Loads of words. Lots of bullshi/t. Somewhere in there is a bit of sense. But you dont really care do you?
What university did you go to? I must write to them and congratulate them. Did you get a 2:2?
I think the in word for you at the mo is a “flamer”. :lol:
Bored with you now.
Well firstly as my post was a “response” (look it up) then sussing out who the flamer is doesnt take much really
And as for “turning it on the complainer” lol, thats so funny I dont know where to start, so youre saying if someone quoted you totally out of context and twisted what you said to make it say the complete opposite of what it said you wouldnt “respond” (thats the proper word for “turning it on the complainer btw) by pointing out what they did? Yeah right lol
Before you critcise my grammatical construction maybe you should actually read whats been written eh instead of just falling in line with the cliqué you “arent” a part of and squeezing on the bandwaggon lol
It was Pebbles who claimed video files “created” paedos if you check back, a point the bit it copied was questioning for validity, except it copied and pasted it so it looked like it said the exact opposite which I then pointed out
So before you talk about turning and twisting things try getting your facts untwisted to begin with, and I’ve never worn a 2:2 in my life, I dont have the legs for it lol :lol:
So yeah, there was lots of BS in that exchange, its just not coming from the person you want it to come from sweetie, but thats life
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
oh do shut up you boring old man…people see you for what you are, a sad perverted (and most likely bald) old man, they dont need me to point it out for them
A simple “OOPS, busted” would have sufficed lol
speaking of miss quotes as you were Uber, I didnt say videos created paedos, i actually said, and i quote “viewing images creates a DEMAND which encourages others to continue abusing and hurting children.” Get it right.
@~Pebbles~ wrote:
speaking of miss quotes as you were Uber, I didnt say videos created paedos, i actually said, and i quote “viewing images creates a DEMAND which encourages others to continue abusing and hurting children.” Get it right.
But that demand would ONLY be by paedos
And if they are already paedos to begin with nothing has been created there
The ones making the films however, they would do it whether anyone watched or not, as they are also ALREADY paedos, doing it because they are paedos and not simply because people want to watch it MAKES them decide to be paedos
So the demand isnt created, its already there, and that demand doesnt “encourage” anyone to continue or start doing anything at all
Thats like saying men watching watching women have sex creates a demand and makes women continue to have sex
They would do it whether anyone watched or not, they do it because they WANT to do it, because they are driven to do it
So as its only to do with paedos, and as those paedos are just there anyway then whether there was a worldwide distribution net of child porn or not they would still be paedos with the same driving urges
Infact you cant create a demand thats already being met, if someone is watching some child porn that demand is already in existence and is already being met otherwise they wouldnt be watching the porn you mentioned to begin with, them WANTING to watch some would be a demand that creates the videos, but them wanting to watch something that has already been made creates nothing at all, it just utilises whats already in existence
But do you really think that if every paedo the world over suddenly, tomorrow stopped watching child porn and never did again that paedos would magically just cease to exist because the demand to watch it vanished? Or would they wake up STILL being paedos and still doing what paedos do but simply saving a fortune on video equipment and postage?
So unless people watching the stuff MAKES people start abusing kids to satisfy the newly invented demand to watch them doing it nothing is “created” at all
So I did get it right actually (IMO obviously)
Because when any demand is “created” theres a void, a void that people then move to fill (no pun intended honest), which would mean people would have to “become” paedos and START abusing kids to fill that void else nothing has been created
And as you also claim if nobody watched them they wouldnt carry on doing it, that also suggests that by the virtue of people watching it non paedo people “become” a paedo just because someone will watch them being one
Now maybe thats not what you intended to be saying, that happens
But just because its not what you meant to intimate doesnt negate the fact that in a purely logical and gramatical sense it IS what you said albeit not directly, but saying all coal is black IS the same as saying no coal is white even tho you didnt actually mention white coal at all
Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!